Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

Started by bajac, October 07, 2012, 06:21:28 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

NATAN and 21 Guests are viewing this topic.

nelsonrochaa

Quote from: forest on November 24, 2014, 02:33:58 PM
nelsonrochaa
I'm really interested in Your ideas about how this type of energy is created, what is the source ?
There must be a source, I don't believe physics laws to be so incomplete.
Who can prove what is the source of excess energy ? Figuera stated it was magnetic field (not just conversion of mechanical energy into electricity).

Hi Forest ,
I really can not honestly answer your question ...I am curious as everyone in general who frequent this type of site and study this kind of things.
My findings from the research on this subject are based on experimentation like most people.

Now my thoughts and my interpretations:
Electricity is a form of conversion of energy and i think the first and most important thing is improve the actual systems of conversion  because don't have efficiency in the conventional way.

If we collect  a magnetic collapse of a coil to a cap, the collected result is proportional with the magnitude of the coil magnetic field magnetization. To generate this magnetic field you need current circulating in coil by a source dipole.
Now if you increase the magnetic field of the coil, the  magnetic collapse when you shut off the main power source (State 0),  will be produce at higher voltage and electrostatic current in the cap, greater than main source .
The charge of capacitor will be more faster than you charge with conventionally power source.

And how to use this, to increase the magnetic field without increase the consume of current in main source ?
You need a way to create a fast pulse of high current with the collected power of magnetic collapse coil, and storage in a cap , to create a rapidly discharges of several pulses of high amps much higher that  main source can provide, combined with high voltage pulse that can be provided by other coil  with BEMF.

The effect of the combination of high current pulses combined with a source of high voltage causes the particles of the atomic nucleus exchange states very quickly, negating the disintegrating forces of positive energy of the protons. At one point, a proton has a positive charge, and a neutron has
neutral charge. and the next moment, a neutron is replaced by positive charge and the proton is replaced by a neutral charge. This exchange of states occurs in unimaginable speeds, thereby nullifying the repellent forces of the same load elements generating a cancellation in the repulsion of two equal poles in the coils. For me is the reason to explain the green gap that occur in my tests.
I think  this gap color result is a Cherenkov radiation .

Read about Tesla colorado springs notes and Ev gray circuits and see the similarity in the effects.

This excess energy or what we can call in my opinion never will be possible measured correctly by conventional tools  because  one of the points used in the conventional measure instruments, (resistance,) seems to be in some form ignored in this type of circuits because their high impedance , caused by the differential of potential in circuit and the reactance  of the coils.

I'm just with my thoughts  and puzzle what I read and test man :) Man people say that im crazy

Ps -Sorry for the English I wish you can understand what I try explain.

Thanks and good work
 

bajac

Quote from: forest on November 24, 2014, 02:25:19 PM
bajac

I think we are progressing so fast we need a quick look into the past and connect dots.
I strongly suggest this is  related (somehow): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ylYgUOfUzY
and this also http://www.richlandsource.com/community/article_fbac1344-779e-11e3-8a2f-10604b9f7e7e.html


Forest,


I think you are right!


I am doing a lot of research and it is a slow process. I try to be very careful when reading the articles. You never know when they could be related. For example, I was performing an internet search using the following keyword "Ferranti" + "perpetual Motion", and found the following article from The Electrical Engineer - Volume 3 on page 201 and dated 1889. This article recounts the story of an appeal against the revocation of a patent application that involved Messrs, Gaulard, Gibbs, and Ferranti. I found the following quote taken from the second column to be interesting and with merits for further investigation:


"The specification as it originally stood, it was argued, seemed to assert that any number of induced currents could be produced by the high-tension current in the main wire without loss of electric energy in the main current - a claim which the petitioner's counsel said amounted to an assertion that the inventors had discovered perpetual motion."

At this time I am trying to find the letters patent No. 4,362 of 1882 and the provisional application No. 15,141 1885. These document may show more details of the patent application such as original drawings and the specification.

hanon

Quote from: nelsonrochaa on November 24, 2014, 11:17:05 AM
Hi Hanon ,
Very usable your test .
Can i ask if you see any type of increase in the magnetic field perpendicular to main coils ?
Did you consider try to connect the main input coils in bifilar mode and pulse them?
Based in some tests that i did , i think you can achieve best results pulsing the main coils with DC at higher frequencies that 50hz .
I make some tests that can be usable to you .
one more time very thanks for your work

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hQM_Zg-R8LI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VXRjGMCBAh0




Thanks for your work.   

Hi Nelson,

Your videos are very interesting . I guess that you are pulsing two coisl and you are collecting the induced magnetic field into a bifilar coil. Is that this way? I have some questions: how are your inducer coils configured: with like poles facing each other or with opposite poles? What method do you use to pulse those coils? (I would like to know this method to use it in my test. Thanks) What is the function of the capacitor? In summary I would like if you could explain shortly the setup shown in the videos. They are really very interesting!!! Thanks. 

Have you tested to collect the induced field with some iron core in the induced coil? If you do this test in the future please tell us which is the results. Also try to test with different induced coil orientations..


In my test: I am sorry but I did not measure the magnetic field perpendicular to the inducers. It was a basic configuration just to measure the induction and see the effect of a load in the input power. How can I measure the magnetic field? Which device should I use to measure it?

hanon

Hi all,

Important video to watch and digest:

A user in the spanish forum (link) has uploaded a video with the induced coils placed perpendiculary to the inducer electromagnets and using like poles facing each other (N--induced--N) (repulsion mode). Powered with AC from the mains.

See the results: the input is not affected when adding a load in the induced circuit.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=st254llePPs

Thank you very much to this user for noting this effect when testing his devices some time ago.

Regards

nelsonrochaa

Quote from: hanon on November 25, 2014, 02:53:50 AM
Hi Nelson,

Your videos are very interesting . I guess that you are pulsing two coisl and you are collecting the induced magnetic field into a bifilar coil. Is that this way? I have some questions: how are your inducer coils configured: with like poles facing each other or with opposite poles? What method do you use to pulse those coils? (I would like to know this method to use it in my test. Thanks) What is the function of the capacitor? In summary I would like if you could explain shortly the setup shown in the videos. They are really very interesting!!! Thanks. 

Have you tested to collect the induced field with some iron core in the induced coil? If you do this test in the future please tell us which is the results. Also try to test with different induced coil orientations..
In my test: I am sorry but I did not measure the magnetic field perpendicular to the inducers. It was a basic configuration just to measure the induction and see the effect of a load in the input power. How can I measure the magnetic field? Which device should I use to measure it?

Hi Hanon,
In the video i put a single turn of cable only to show how the type of connection (Bibfilar or normal) can improve the capture of induced currents. But the power collected is not by induction :) is only the result of magnetic collapse in the coils , and electrostatic currents.
I use the relay in auto-oscillation because the relay will provide the oscillation to the coils in core ,and can manage in their contacts the combination process of combine the large current collected in capacitor with the BEMF coil of the relay . Will give you the green flare as you see in my video , but the curious is how the magnetic field will increase  much higher.
I will try to make a diagram simplified to try explain better.
Thanks Hanon