My humble prediction: We won't have an available free energy product in ages.

[poynt99]

It does not have to be difficult, look at this:

http://www.overunity.com/12487/simple-to-build-isolation-transformer-that-consumes-less-power-than-it-gives-out/msg346358/#msg346358

Turn any trafo more efficient, and if trafo as normal trafo is efficient enough the it gives OU. Check the question I ask in above link, can anyone give an answer to what is going on ?

You've mentioned this a number of times, but I've never seen you or anyone substantiate your claim with demonstrable proof. Why then do you make this claim?

As for your question, what is the value of the "AC" voltage source? Is that a 1:1 transformer?

[Jack Noskills]

My fault for not making videos but that is not my style. All I can do is to make circuit diagrams of real system I have tested, and it is not that hard to rewire a 1:1 trafo.

My watt meter says I am using 5 watts when I light bulb at around 25 watts. It says also 5 watts when there is no load connected so watt meters are not to be trusted. I could go and spend big bucks for DSO but 20 watts of extra power is not worth the effort, unless I could loop it back. Well, in that case I would not need the DSO anymore lol.

[bugler]

Just a thought. Since I'm here, have you checked out my main thread at

http://www.overunity.com/13102/the-paradox-engine/#.UK9HQmfp5Qw

Btw I would greatly appreciate it if you would copy the material and reply making it clear that you had done so, regardless of whether you accept the premise or not.

Hello.


Thanks for you answer. Right now I have to study almost all day long. I get very tired at night.


Hopefully in June I will have finished my current studies and I will have time to study things like your device.


Cheers.

[poynt99]

My fault for not making videos but that is not my style. All I can do is to make circuit diagrams of real system I have tested, and it is not that hard to rewire a 1:1 trafo.

I did not say it had to be your video.

I asked for a link to any replication supporting your claim of OU with your circuit. This is based on your statement that others have replicated your OU results.

Still waiting.

[JouleSeeker]

Hi, Bugler --
This is Steven E Jones, Professor Emeritus etc.  (labels don't mean much to me at this stage, but I think you know who I am).

OK, I'm willing to stick my neck out with a prediction -- that we will have a working, testable, replicated "anomalous energy device"  by August 2013.  I can't say how many watts one will be able to get out of this at this time; but measurable power from a non-conventional source of energy is what I'm predicting.
Yes, I'm doing some fun experiments myself.

Some of my rationale for this humble prediction can be found in this article:

http://pesn.com/2012/11/19/9602225_Steven_Jones_replica--Pons_and_Fleischmann_XS_Heat_not_from_fusion/#disqus_thread

And please also see my comments to this article. 

No, I don't like the terms "ou" or "free energy" for the reasons given there. 

  Mankind has identified several sources of energy, wind, sun, hydro, fossil fuels, that go back millenia.   Nuclear power did not enter the scene until after 1937 (I give Lise Meitner and colleagues credit for the 1938 discovery which spurred nuclear power production.)

  The harnessing of nuclear energy in the 1940's and thereafter changed the world.

Now, are we SURE that we have finally discovered ALL the sources of energy that nature has to offer?

Or is there yet an untapped source of energy, that remains to be fully discovered and harnessed?


NOTE that I am not talking about a violation of the laws of physics, here.  Far from it.  Rather, I'm suggesting that even great scientists may not know all there is to know, that there may well be as yet untapped sources of energy that we may find.