Finally! Independent Testing Of Rossi's E-Cat Cold Fusion Device. Success?

[markdansie]

Many thanks TK for your answer, the other reason in the end I did not proceed wast he condition I do not talk to you about anything, I do not like conditions. She is laying out a lot of conditions for the test as well. Its interesting, I remember once going to South Africa and very highly qualified electrical engineer had the wool pulled over his eyes by a crafty inventor (magnetic motor) It takes people like you not only with exceptional expertise, but the experience of working with these technologies.
No doubt I will get some abusive emails again.

Email me sometime (markdansie@gmail.com ) I have a question unrelated to these topics you might have an insight on.

Kind Regards
Mark

[profitis]

@tk..i would suggest to you and mrs ainslie to use two seperate batteries or caps,one to power circuit,one to recharge.have you perhaps tried this before?powering a circuit AND recharging on a single bat or cap is one way to encounter all sorts probs,chemical damage,i.r./strain losses,screws with the battery's mind big time.

[fritz]

@mark and @fritz...im thinking that no i.r. meter would be needed,and no wattmeter would be needed either. at 'tenfold' conventional power one would only have to stand in front of 1)the controll and 2)the hotcat and simply feel the heat-blast,big dif guys.

... But using hi-tec equippment typically improves confidence, whatever humbug is going on.
If you have ten witnesses stating that they operated a fin sauna for ten days by means of a single 1.5V cell - you will argue that it was mass-suggestion.
If they measured the setup with a 64ch thermocouple setup - you would exclude mass-suggestion but insist on wrong calibration.... and so on.
Its difficult to achieve extra-ordinary-proof.
Even if you blow up north korea with an e-cat nuke - there will be no proof but a banned technology.

[profitis]

yes @fritz.its also hard for some scientists to accept that sumtin 'just dont figure here'.we gota do our own tests.

[TinselKoala]

@tk..i would suggest to you and mrs ainslie to use two seperate batteries or caps,one to power circuit,one to recharge.have you perhaps tried this before?powering a circuit AND recharging on a single bat or cap is one way to encounter all sorts probs,chemical damage,i.r./strain losses,screws with the battery's mind big time.

I am not the one making claims, Ainslie is. Please feel free to join her forum and make your suggestions to her yourself.

Have I recharged batteries and capacitors using various inductive spike circuits? Yes, many times. Including Ainslie circuits? Yes, many times, and my work is documented on YouTube. Have I actually even run devices on batteries or capacitors that the device itself charged? Yes, I have. Have I run a device on a small battery and charged up a larger battery with its spikes? Yes, I have. Have other people done these things too? Of course they have. Have I ever encountered a pair of swapping batteries whose _total energy content_ went up during the course of these experiments? No, I have not. Has anyone else, ever? No, not that I am aware of.