Rosemary Ainslie Circuit Demonstration, June 1 2013

[profitis]

@tk i wouldnt be surprized if with all these myriads of variations of circuitries centred around cores some guys have gotten overunities perfected but they would be few and far between and wouldve gone out the backdoors for a fast quiet buck for sure.i very much doubt that the establishment will change its permitted views regardless of who brings them an overunity device.its simply not in their intrests to blow the horn and mass promote free energy to peasants,however,let me see if i can find a working example somewhere and bring it to you.have you chekd out paul lawrence,s circuits?one of the few guys ive seen who knew what was going on in the core and adjusted his circuitry accordingly. 

[SeaMonkey]

The Ainslie Circuit is not without flaw.
But the complications brought about
by the unorthodox connections are
rather easily corrected and that
process of modification (improvement)
would obviate the inconvenience for the
dual polarity Signal Generator input.

Some of you have already demonstrated
that you are more than capable of reasoning
these things out.

Think "Floating MOSFET Switch" or even
"Transformer Coupling."

All of the energy expended upon Rosemary
herself is wasted effort.  Although, for some
it seems to be a source of almost addictive
"fun."

Rosemary may come across as being disrespectful
and rude at times; but it must be admitted that
her pronouncements are always made affectionately.

[MileHigh]

The LEDs of DOOM have become the DSO of DOOM.  lol

[markdansie]

This is one of the reasons why people like Ainslie and Wayne Travis bug me so much. They make these great claims, and try to cloak themselves with some kind of legitimacy, but when push comes to shove, they CANNOT demonstrate the validity of their claims at all. If they only could, I could help them out a lot. And myself at the same time, as the bringer of good news to people who desperately want to hear about it. But they cannot. Yet they continue to bloviate, make claims they cannot support, insult their critics and cynically laugh all the way to the bank with their gullible investor's dollars. Or Rand or Lira or Pounds or whatever.

I have to agree, and always be on my guard that I am not used to bring any legitimacy to any of these people. I am happy to bring their projects to the attention of others for assessment. In the case of Wayne, after many visits , not only me but many others, it is really time to have the proof of concept running so the claims can be confirmed or not confirmed. I have put a September 1 deadline on that.
It is a fine line and that is why 95% of the work I do is under NDA, which works both ways they can not use my name.
Sadly as you know most of these projects I look at (well 99.9%) never pan out for a variety of reasons.
Kind Regards
Mark

[TinselKoala]

Sigh.

@profitis:
Yes, I am familiar with Paul Lowrance. Some people I know call him PLOL. He has never managed to demonstrate anything unusual, as far as I am aware. If you know of something different, please let me know.

@seamonkey:
I've run Ainslie's circuit with no function generator, using a selfcontained 555 timer powered by the main batteries. I have also tried driving the gates through simple optoisolators (doesn't work properly, due to the need for a current source for oscillations to happen, and is in fact proof of this.) I have not tried transformer coupling in the Ainslie circuit, although I have used it to great effect to drive the mosfet gates in my TinselKoil 2. But I don't think it would work in the Ainslie circuit because the oscillations need a constant source of DC bias current in order to proceed, and the transformer gate drive scheme can't really provide a DC current.

The oscillations can be produced quite easily and continuously for as long as you like, with no external components other than a 9volt battery and a rheostat, but with that setup you get oscillations only and no Q1 "on" times, so you cannot produce high load heating. However, according to Ainslie the batteries should be not discharging, or should be recharging, or something, during the oscillations. (Any action during Q1 ON times is purely conventional; the magic allegedly must happen during the oscillations.)

But of course, real experimentation with proper measurements disproves Ainslie's claims wrt the oscillations too. We will get to those; right now we are dealing with the absence of current in the Q1 mosfet even though it is clearly getting sufficient gate drive to turn on, as shown in Ainslie's Figure 3 scopeshot.

Do you have anything specifically to say about that topic?