Rosemary Ainslie Circuit Demonstration June 29, 2013 Video Segments

[profitis]

lol @seamonkey..its hard to let go they say..

[profitis]

@tk hey listen youve been quite valuable when it comes to debates,at least you have more balls than milehigh and pw so im gna try not get on your tits and freak your threads out k.as markdansie said youve earned your stripes,peaceout.

[TinselKoala]

Meanwhile.... Ainslie remains clueless and continues to demonstrate that fact with every post she makes.

She demands that .99 do something she CANNOT do: make a "figure 3 scopeshot with 4 volts on the gate". Figure 3 shows TWELVE VOLTS on the gate and that is the matter of contention, and that is what she demonstrated that she cannot do.

She, nor anyone else, CANNOT set the FG drive to +4 volts, then produce the Figure 3 scopeshot showing +12 volts by moving a probe REFERENCE as she has claimed.
Further, a signal of +4 volts applied to the gate of Q1 WILL MOST CERTAINLY cause the transistor to conduct in its linear response region, as I have amply shown above and as Ainslie's own work shows.

She is asking .99 to "replicate" her fantasies. She cannot do it herself, as she demonstrated on the 29th of June. So why is she continuing to make these false arguments about moving probes, FG terminals and etc? It is because she is clueless, but more than that: she is willfully ignorant, because these topics have been explained so thoroughly here in this thread that there is not a single supporter of hers left able to argue in her favor. Not even Donovan Martin himself.

[profitis]

 lets see if 99 can do it.this should be intresting...

[poynt99]

With +4V gate drive, there is significant current flow, even at just 36V battery supply. I will do a video, but Fig.3 can not be done, even at 4V gate drive (i.e. there will still be current showing on the CSR).