MEG

[Freedomfuel]

Deleted

[Tesla_2006]

Hello, MEG is a particular case of an ancien device called the MAGNETIC AMPLIFIER there is from 1950, that device was used for audio power amplification, so if you have 1KW of power audio, you can get in the output up to 3 KW, his structure is the same of the MEG of Bearden a magnet in the center leg of the transformer and 2 magnetic circuits and so using the energy conservation law the energy of the magnet more the input energy is the output, when all is done in the design the COP of the system is COP = N +1, where N is the number of magnetic circuits of the system, so for the classic MEG the theoric maximun COP is 3 but in practical sense you can get Cops from 2, 2.5, 2.8,.... for the losses in the system
Another name of the ancien Magnetic Amplifier was the MAGNETIC TRANSISTOR and many books of electronic from 1950 make comparations between the classic silicon transistor and a common transformer using a magnet or a coil with a DC source

The building of this device is not single and not very difficult is the same as build a silicon transistor, there is curves, operating points, theory to know, that is say you must know in deep what are you building, if not, you can get any thing, you must to know for build this magnetic circuits, B-H magnetization curves,etc,...i see many people try this using ferrite cores, you can use common iron from transformers for 60 Hz applications, you buy a transformer and only cut his central leg and change his coils for the power you need, 1 KW, 5 KW,etc,...

I am in a company we build this devices since years from some watts for bulbs up to 1 KW, 5 KVA, 10 KVA, 250 KVA , and more, the starting device go from a battery to a rectifier connected to the common 60 Hz or 50 Hz electric net

Any question or documentation I can send if writte to this email     gigawattgratis@123mail.cl


Bye

[hartiberlin]

@Tesla_2006

Please let us know more.
Thanks !

[PaulLowrance]

I know someone that visited Tom Beardon and the MEG does not work as described.  Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't (the prototype) and no one knows why.  This unit is not dependable and probably a waste of time pursueing.  People really need to post the complete problems with the units so others don't waste the limited resources availabe by ending in repeated failure (i.e. time and money). John Bedini has given many clues but the one that bothers me the most is the Kromrey Generator that was shown over 600% o/u but will not work as per patent.  John found the required changes but does not tell you what was changed.

I predict that the MEG will be able to loop (self run) when they figure out (IMHO) the free energy comes from ambient temperature within the high permeability magnetic material.  I think they need to flow sufficient air over the cores, but if thick layers of magnetic wire cover the core then it's difficult to keep the cores temperature stable.

I've spent so much money (literally $1,000's and 100's of manhours) building and playing but I'm tired of rebuilding units that don't work.  When someone gets something to work, just release the damn thing!

I agree!!!  This is far too big for self gain. The first person who creates the smoking gun (self running) should publish the exact detailed build instructions followed by a patent and allow everyone to build for personal use or even to sell for profit or non-profit.

Paul

[fletchmo]

The MEG, as described in the patent, usually gets replicated as a biased transformer. I have come to believe that the MEG is NOT supposed to be a transformer. It is supposed to operate as a dual flux pathway with gates (the 'primary' coils). The unfortuneate outcome of winding a coil to create a gate for the flux is that the coil introduces more flux into the core and complicates the process of gating the magnets flux. Most of the time the gating process doesn't work as a gate but does work as though it is the primary of a transformer. The outcome of using a common transformer type approach to this gating process is that the MEG no longer can function as an overunity device because instead of switching the flux with the input coils, we introduce power into the entire core and operate as a common transformer which, by its nature, cannot perform at overunity.
Consider that if we cut a section out of the core at the locations of the switching coils and substituted into that gap a 'magic' material which had the property of decreasing it's permiability with a electronic input, we would then have a flux switcher-which is precisely what the MEG appears to be.
This process could be done mechanically, but what we really want is a solid state device. Any ideas for a "magic material" out there????
Norm