another Self looped Generator Claim

[TinselKoala]

Not only has it reappeared, there is new input from Chuck!

August 15, 2013; 00:30 am Eastern: RepairingI sent a text message to Chuck asking: "Any Luck?"[/font][/size]
He replied:[/font][/size]"Yes, main relay and sub-relay from primary generator were damaged. Replaced main contactor. Replacing sub contactor as we speak. Also, one coil burnt on start-up on main contactor and sub-contator were physically broken, so that's why it wouldn't engage. Won't take much longer."[/font][/size]"Been very sick the last 2 or 3 days."[/font][/size]Then, Pat called and said he was just leaving Chuck's place. He thought it would take another day at least.[/font][/size]
Then Chuck wrote: "Thank God none of the generators or the drive system were destroyed. That would have been costly."[/font][/size][/font][/size]

Thank God! That will of course be the _next_ failure, or the one after that. We wouldn't want to disable the device "permanently" yet, while the fish are still on the hook.

[profitis]

@tinman..i see you do have a somewhat open mind after all.indeed you can get a 2lot violation with a magnetic or electromagnetic system if you  juxtaposition the thermodynamic energy exchanges to just the right way.perfecto

[LibreEnergia]

@tinman..i see you do have a somewhat open mind after all.indeed you can get a 2lot violation with a magnetic or electromagnetic system if you  juxtaposition the thermodynamic energy exchanges to just the right way.perfecto

So you keep claiming but never provide any proof. All the available evidence suggests the opposite.

Magnetization of low Currie point materials follows normal thermodynamic laws.

[markdansie]

@ Profitis,
why don't you write a couple of articles or papers on your pet subject for revolution-green as a guest writer?
Kind Regards

[Farmhand]

I did,and UFO asked me to leave the thread,or he would have me removed. I went as far as to spend my own hard earnd cash to prove he was doing it wrong.Even after showing him this,and providing him with the correct method,he still insisted that he did it right.This was his second call of overunity.The first was ofcourse by using light globes-as per the normal form of measurements with OU devices that we see all the time.
Here is the video i made showing both UFO's method,and the propper prony brake method.
This was back in january,when i carried out the test. It seems that UFO has removed all his comments on that video???.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rkwRA28Y0dM

Tinman, well done, impressive result. I was on a similar train of thought but was complaining of the change in friction due to the heat more than anything else,
I must have missed the calculation part. Anyway you nailed it, and with good measure. Like your work Sir. >

Cheers

P.S. Wouldn't just one scale and a "weight" be more accurate as then the lengthening of the rope would have little to no effect ?

That's a slab demo ! Better than a six pack demo.


...