Self accelerating reed switch magnet spinner.

[synchro1]

This is what a Piezo actuator circuit looks like:

[synchro1]

"The 'field' reversal within the armature relates to atomic domain (electron spin axis) alignments within it, and likely starts at some magnet related centre-line field bulge acting upon the armature surface domains and inducing symmetrical but oppositely polarised waves of reversal which avalanche outwards and through the entire armature".



The polarity shift is merely exciting the fields in the diametric magnet stack and generating a current, not triggering a "Field Reversal" of atomic domain like in Gary's soft iron keeper!

[conradelektro]

Well, the Piezo actuator http://www.allmotion.com/EZPZ23-HR1description.htm is a bit too steep for me, price wise and electronic wise.

I rather experiment with a "electric bell" set up. Hendershot did not have a Piezo actuator in the 1920ies and 1930ies.

But let's do it step by step, first the "synchro coil", then we see more.

Greetings, Conrad

[conradelektro]

"The 'field' reversal within the armature relates to atomic domain (electron spin axis) alignments within it, and likely starts at some magnet related centre-line field bulge acting upon the armature surface domains and inducing symmetrical but oppositely polarised waves of reversal which avalanche outwards and through the entire armature".

The polarity shift is merely exciting the fields in the diametric magnet stack and generating a current, not triggering a "Field Reversal" of atomic domain like in Gary's soft iron keeper!

I might understand that, but what is the horse shoe magnet of Gary in the "spining magnet and synchro coil"?

What is the Gary's plate (in the neutral zone) in the "spining magnet and synchro coil"?

That is my conceptual problem at the moment. I do not see the equivalents in Gary's idea and synchro's idea? There is nothing "spinning" in Gary's idea?

I like the spinning magnet with the "synchro coil" (simple and clean) but I do not see how it relates to Gary's horse shoe magnet and plate?

Greetings, Conrad

[synchro1]

@Conradelektro,

The plate you're referring to is the stack of iron laminations with a coil wrapped around it that vibrates over the horseshoe magnet right? The Bloch wall comes up from the center of the horseshoe magnet and mushrooms out into a shell. The diametric rotor has the same Bloch wall mushroom shell as the horseshoe magnet. There's a good schematic of this on Morpher44's video introductions, I can't find a way to copy it over.


Spinning the horseshoe magnet would not influence the position of the Bloch wall or mushrooming neutral zone. There's no attraction or repulsion inside the neutral zone. Spinning the horseshoe magnet with the iron keeper inside the neutral zone would have no effect on either the magnet or the keeper; However, if it wobbled a little bit, it would have the same effect on the keeper as vibrating the keeper in and out of the zone to reverse the domain polarity while stationary. The saturation effect on the iron eventually kills the reversal effect and makes this model extremely inefficient. Using the advanced neo magnets over the soft iron keeper laminations is thousands of times more powerful. Our test setup is basically identical to Wesley Gary's original patent, except we're wrapping around a stack of magnets and vibrating the field instead of wrapping around a stack of iron laminations and reversing the atomic domain. Every diametric magnet rotor is just eccentric enough to oscillate the zone due to the low tolerance's of the magnet manufacturers.


After you're finished wrapping the magnet coil and confirming the COP>1 OU with your sophisticated scientific measuring instruments, I believe we'll attract other experimenters from the group and together be able move forward and perfect the generator. This work of yours is an extremely important step, because I don't have the laboratory equipment to adequately confirm my claims.