Auroratek self sustainable technologies Overunity to market in Arizona USA

[ramset]

Well
I did have a nice Chat with Aurora as well as Bill....


The entire conversation was about testing the claim ,they are very receptive and open to
serious investigation of the claim by qualified individuals .[at their facility].


No problem.


More to come.


Thx
Chet

[scratchrobot]

I'm not 100% convinced Bill will have the 'never plug in' battery charger in the near future or ever but I'm willing to wait and see without saying it's not possible.  I'll give him the benefit of the doubt because I know he is an  engineer with good credentials and has been at this concept a long time.  I don't believe we as a human race know everything there is to know at this point in time.  I think there are still new things to be discovered that will break old paradigms and some laws of science.  My casual interest in Bills charger is not because it's a good free energy device but because it would be unique.  Right now with the price he has on his basic charger one can get solar cells that will put out more than 20 amps @ 12 volts for less money.  So as long as there is Sun you would get more for your battery charging money with solar.   
   
     If I did buy one I think I'm capable of testing a battery charger myself.  After all I've got 4 Oscilloscopes including a 400 MHz digital Phillips, 2 digital Fluke meters along with other ones (unlike the cheapy Harbor Freight looking ones you seem to always show TK - although I know you have other decent equipment - why no quality meters?), a frequency counter, digital function generators and so on although I'm sure one could come up with some good tests that wouldn't even need all that equipment.  I'm not considering buying one but I won't close the door on this idea.  I just wish some others here could see there are infinite possibilities and we have barely scratched the surface ....  think about where things were just 50 years ago.  Most people know about or have a smartphone (calling them smartphone barely hints at what they really are - a high powered multicore CPU hand held voice or touch controlled computer with billions of bytes of storage and mutliple long distance audio and visual communication capabilities and mutliple sensors including gloabal positioning, magnetometer, accelerometer, compass, proximity sensor,ambient light sensor, gyroscope, barometer, visual recorder and temperature sensor to name a few - sort of like a Star Trek Tricorder telecommunicator combined all in a 5 ounce hand held package ).  I'm quite sure scientists 40 or 50 years ago would have said some of the things a smartphone can do would be impossible.   Could they have even dreamed it would be possible?  Think 100 years ago what scientists would have thought about you if you gave them the complete description of a smartphone.

Think 100 years ahead and what computers can do then, maybe we already live in a computer simulation run by our descendants

[scratchrobot]

I remember Don Smith talking about his technology was also powering various vehicles like scooter and airplanes, i did some research and guess what

[TinselKoala]

Ahem.

For certain purposes I use ElCheepo Cen-Tech DMMs from Harbor Freight, and recently a donated Excel XL830L (which suffers much more from ambient RF than the CenTechs do), and an inexpensive ProsKit RLC meter. However.... my meters are calibrated and cross-checked by comparison to other, "higher quality" meters. Do you know, for example, the impedance of your DMM when used as an ammeter? I do. Have you ever seen anyone else measure, for example, an unknown inductance using three different methods, to make sure the commercial inductance meter is performing accurately? Is there anyone else around here who routinely uses an instrument like the Philips 6676 frequency counter, with its always-on oven-stabilized crystal oscillator reference that is precise to nine significant digits?

I work on the fringes of component ratings and I frequently work with high frequency high voltage very noisy signals. I do not like to subject my Fluke 83 or my Simpson 464 or some of my other equipment to those kinds of signals, and for routine measurements of DC voltage and current I have a dedicated pair of the CenTech models, that are known to have very small degrees of error. When I cite DC measurements from these meters I will stand by an accuracy level of under 5 percent and usually better than 2 percent error. These meters have also been calibrated using high frequency oscillating or pulsed signals and are surprisingly accurate at returning "average" values of  complex signals of voltage and current. However when I use meters like these for complex signals I generally back up the measurements with numbers in boxes from the Link DSO. But which instrument is really backing up which?   

And as I've shown a few times, for "serious work" I have much better (read more expensive) kit available to me. But believe you me... if there is even one percent of "overunity" in any device I can fit into my lab, my own daily routine instruments and my techniques will detect it reliably.

I have to laugh when people quote five or six digits of precision in a measurement or calculation, and their apparatus is made of components stuck onto a ten-dollar breadboard and wired together with cheap Chinese colored clipleads.

OK, back to work....

[TinselKoala]

I remember Don Smith talking about his technology was also powering various vehicles like scooter and airplanes, i did some research and guess what