Is this the same? Gundersons Solid State Electric Generator Patent

[Overtone]

We do not yet have a self-running device, but all of our commercialization efforts are based on achieving such units.

Our focus is getting generators and demonstration devices into production asap.

Everything else has to be much lower in priority.

There are too few of us and too much work to be done to spend much time on this or any other forum.

Three very large domestic firms have begun evaluating our work and are potential licensees.

Mark

[Overtone]

Grumpy,

RTS is our subsidiary, formed in 1993 to develop polymer Ultraconductors(tm).

If you read my posts, you will see that nobody is likely to succeed in making an Over Unity generator based on the present patent application. It is far more difficult and expensive to develop than is apparent.

We welcome all competitors. The world needs this type of technology urgently and we cheer anyone on who tries to develop it. 

Cyril is well aware of the point of view reflected in the comment you made and has been for many years.

Best to all,

Mark

Mark

[MeggerMan]

Hi Mark,

We do not yet have a self-running device, but all of our commercialization efforts are based on achieving such units.

Ah, I thought you did have a self running unit. 
Are you confident that it can be made self running?
If not then that puts into question a lot of other devices like the MEG.
So when you apply for a patent, you may show a device that shows over-unity only but does not need to be self-running?

Surely you would build at least one prototype self running unit before you commit to a production run.

Regards
Rob

[acp]

overtone, you really are a funny guy.................

[Hoppy]

Overtone wrote: -

"We do not yet have a self-running device, but all of our commercialization efforts are based on achieving such units."

How big were the batteries powering the TPU's shown in the video then?