The Holographic Universe and Pi = 4 in Kinematics!

[gravityblock]

Shut.  The FUCK. Up. 

It was actually an exercise left for the reader.  Yes what I made WAS an assertion but if you had learned logic from somewhere other than the internet you would have realized that not every assertion IS an argument.

But now I guess it's on...

Are you saying that Miles Mathis use of "steps" to demonstrate that Pi=4 (Effectively this:http://jamiehubball.files.wordpress.com/2013/09/tumblr_lbxrvck4pk1qbylvso1_400.png?w=549) is correct?

We can draw eight steps or 64 steps or an infinity of steps, and it will not change a thing.

Is this a correct way to find the length of the arc?

Also notice how I take time to get you to put your thesis in words we agree upon before I kick the living crap out of it.  A habit you might want to pick up.

Do you disagree with Mathis's statement of, "we can draw eight steps or 64 steps or an infinity of steps, and it will not change a thing?  If you disagree with his statement, then please show how the perimeter changes after each step.  Your method for finding the length of the arc is not applicable for a circular path with a time variable.

Al-right, then once again let me get your thesis in words before we begin, as I previously did with the car race.  Do you think pi is a dimensionless constant?  Also, do you think the circumference is only a length and/or only a distance in a circular path with a time element?

Gravock

[gravityblock]

Oooh baiting!!!  It's a fun game for all on the internet.  You assert that I make false claims.  Where is your proof?  Oopsie daisy!!!

My proof is your lack of references, your lack of mathematical rebuttals, and your lack of scientific rebuttals to back up your assertions.

Gravock

[gravityblock]

Oooh, more baiting!

More spam, by the spam bot!

Gravock

[MarkE]

Is this a correct way to find the length of the arc?

Also notice how I take time to get you to put your thesis in words we agree upon before I kick the living crap out of it.  A habit you might want to pick up.


Do you disagree with Mathis's statement of, "we can draw eight steps or 64 steps or an infinity of steps, and it will not change a thing?  If you disagree with his statement, then please show how the perimeter changes after each step.  Your method for finding the length of the arc is not applicable for a circular path with a time variable.

Al-right, then once again let me get your thesis in words before we begin, as I previously did with the car race.  Do you think pi is a dimensionless constant?  Also, do you think the circumference is only a length and/or only a distance in a circular path with a time element?

Gravock

LOL.  "Pee Wee's Playhouse" went off the air but you give us this.

[MarkE]

My proof is your lack of references, your lack of mathematical rebuttals, and your lack of scientific rebuttals to back up your assertions.

Gravock

LOL.  Your statements are all ... wait for it ... assertions!