The Holographic Universe and Pi = 4 in Kinematics!

[MarkE]

fair use
noun
noun: fair use; plural noun: fair uses

    (in US copyright law) the doctrine that brief excerpts of copyright material may, under certain circumstances, be quoted verbatim for purposes such as criticism, news reporting, teaching, and research, without the need for permission from or payment to the copyright holder.

I don't have the time nor the energy to rephrase the excerpts that is being used for teaching and research purposes.  The excerpts are not stolen and falls under fair use, and is not plagiarism as you wrongly asserted.  Also, the formula of d_t = |x₂ - x₁| + |y₂ - y₁| is an in-line image on the website, and I choose not to copy this image, but to type it out.   I find it interesting how you throw plagiarism at me for exposing your deliberate misdirection in one of your previous posts.  You have now exposed your immaturity and how you are a very vindictive person.  Also, this is totally off-topic, and is not a mathematical or scientific rebuttal in any sense.

Gravock

It's little wonder that with your pants so full you don't understand the difference between plagiarism and copyright violation.  The latter is about obtaining permission to republish another's work.  The former is about crediting the source.

[gravityblock]

LOL.  You wish to propose a system of plane geometry that cannot distinguish between two slopes to describe ... wait for it ... the distance along sloped lines and arcs.  Have your pants exploded yet?

Taxicab geometry only fails one of the axioms or postulates of Euclidean geometry, ... wait for it... and this is not one of them.

Gravock

[MarkE]

Taxicab geometry only fails one of the axioms or postulates of Euclidean geometry, ... wait for it... and this is not one of them.

Gravock

LOL.  Funny how you are drawing Euclidean circles and saying that you are measuring them in taxicab geometry.  I'd warn the neighbors about those pants of yours.

[gravityblock]

It's little wonder that with your pants so full you don't understand the difference between plagiarism and copyright violation.  The latter is about obtaining permission to republish another's work.  The former is about crediting the source.

Another wrong assertion by you!

Plagiarism is the "wrongful appropriation" and "stealing and publication" of another author's "language, thoughts, ideas, or expressions" and the representation of them as one's own original work.  According to the fair use act, brief excerpts do not need permission to be republished if used for teaching and research purposes and is not considered wrongful appropriation, as you once again wrongly asserted.  I never claimed the excerpts as my own original work, and it is also not defined as stealing under the fair use act if used for teaching and research purposes.

Are you claiming the two images you provided in your previous posts are your own work?  If not, then I'm sure you didn't obtain permission to republish those copyrighted images.

Gravock

[gravityblock]

LOL.  Funny how you are drawing Euclidean circles and saying that you are measuring them in taxicab geometry.  I'd warn the neighbors about those pants of yours.

Are you asserting euclidean circles drawn in taxicab geometry is the one postulate of Euclidean geometry in which it fails?

Gravock