1939 Gravity Power - multiply power by 1200%

[poplianil]

1939 Skinner was very smart, he is trying to use the centrifugal force generated by the swinging of the two weights, 2 X 2 times each revolution. See the attached diagram which shows how he changes the direction of CF to use it as input power. Too many replication have deviated from this and are are just focussing on  driving a flywheel.
The faster the operation , the more the output

[ARMCORTEX]

But your confidence means nothing to us.

No matter what you say.

What exactly are you bringing to the table here, you speak as if you know this was gonna work.

[poplianil]

I am just demonstarting how he uses the CF generated to reduce input energy, go and see the various videios on you tube which are moving in wrong direction

[justcurious]

William Skinner Machine
Hi everyone

First of all I am no mathematition, engineer, electrical or mechanical but I felt the need to try and simplify what skinner tried to achieve by showing the basic principles involved, that said, I am truly fascinated by the discovery of William Skinners machine I believe he was a true visionary it seems he took two basic laws of physics (gravity and leverage) and put them together to produce what I believe is an answer to all future global energy problems.  In fig 1 you will see that with a 12-1 lever ratio and a double beam set up you can achieve 144 X energy input, the measurements of the set up for the single beam is,  beam length 72" from 10lb wieght to fulcrum. fulcrum to 120lb wieght 6".   these calculations although not precise do show that the double beam set up can achieve this phenominal increase in power, as you can see this double beam set up keeps all the wieghts in balance and I wonder if skinner tried to keep this balance thru his system so there was no mechanical advantage or disadvantage in the wieghts, I think only trial and error will test this.  I used this website for the calculations.  http://www.engineersedge.com/calculators/levers/page_levers_1.htm   
I believe in my own mind that skinner took the concept of the double beam and turned it thru 180deg  using a gimbal for the fulcrum (fig2). I think the clever part is the translation plate that Aaron quite eloquently points out in great detail on his website 'energetic forum', I haven't put this in as there has been enough explained and demonstrated about this item. As far as elipse v circle for the motion I feel that both are utilised that is to say that the force on the translation plate is circular but an elipse is naturally created within the circle anyone who has played with a spirograph as a kid will see and understand this. Here is a link for those who have not used or seen a spirograph.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=empkBYhWEZQ .  I think that Skinner kept all the driving forces circular with the exception of the natural elipse in the translation plate to simplify the mechanics. I am sorry if I seem to have over simplified this but I hope it will give people an insite into the principles. Cheers!

[Low-Q]

William Skinner Machine
Hi everyone

First of all I am no mathematition, engineer, electrical or mechanical but I felt the need to try and simplify what skinner tried to achieve by showing the basic principles involved, that said, I am truly fascinated by the discovery of William Skinners machine I believe he was a true visionary it seems he took two basic laws of physics (gravity and leverage) and put them together to produce what I believe is an answer to all future global energy problems.  In fig 1 you will see that with a 12-1 lever ratio and a double beam set up you can achieve 144 X energy input, the measurements of the set up for the single beam is,  beam length 72" from 10lb wieght to fulcrum. fulcrum to 120lb wieght 6".   these calculations although not precise do show that the double beam set up can achieve this phenominal increase in power, as you can see this double beam set up keeps all the wieghts in balance and I wonder if skinner tried to keep this balance thru his system so there was no mechanical advantage or disadvantage in the wieghts, I think only trial and error will test this.  I used this website for the calculations.  http://www.engineersedge.com/calculators/levers/page_levers_1.htm   
I believe in my own mind that skinner took the concept of the double beam and turned it thru 180deg  using a gimbal for the fulcrum (fig2). I think the clever part is the translation plate that Aaron quite eloquently points out in great detail on his website 'energetic forum', I haven't put this in as there has been enough explained and demonstrated about this item. As far as elipse v circle for the motion I feel that both are utilised that is to say that the force on the translation plate is circular but an elipse is naturally created within the circle anyone who has played with a spirograph as a kid will see and understand this. Here is a link for those who have not used or seen a spirograph.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=empkBYhWEZQ .  I think that Skinner kept all the driving forces circular with the exception of the natural elipse in the translation plate to simplify the mechanics. I am sorry if I seem to have over simplified this but I hope it will give people an insite into the principles. Cheers!

You're right about saying you're not an engineer. Don't confuse energy with force.



Vidar