1939 Gravity Power - multiply power by 1200%

[mscoffman]

I may be wrong but the item in the last previous post of Artoj is probably the
*output* power transmission mechanism as well as the stated input! See you want
to give the (virtual) gyrorotors a time to "evolve" their mechanical state while
freewheeling, only later to couple out the power generated after interacting with
the universe (which is what a gyroscope does) before outputting the extra power
and repeating the whole process sequence again. The input power from the motor
probably rotates the offset bar right at the very bottom which uses the drive chain
to force the bottom rotor to spin synchronously while it nutates. Note the conical
cable wires are there to help stiffen the bottom spindle reference shafts. This is so
a flexation of the upper spindle shafts feed power into the machine too. The four
upper spindle shafts come to central "point" at the very top of the machine where
the power transmission exits. Usually those factories fed the mechanical power
from above to client machines on the floor.

Someone wishing to work on a machine like this should probably have access to 3d
design software and a simulator.

:S:MarkSCoffman

[CuriousChris]

I still haven't worked why its called gravity power. I think the inventor (obviously a genius amongst geniuses) is using a little diversion there.

I am still working on it and am sure I will crack it very soon.

mscoffman:

Your words are very thought provoking.

Allah be with you

[alfilmx]

I may be wrong but I think that this design is similar to jhon device http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9-KVo4lxHgE
I thought that did not have the torque that jhon says

[Artoj]

Great find alfilmx, this is exactly the principle of Skinners device.

[DreamThinkBuild]

Hi Hartiberlin,

Can you use a gum ribbon on the black wheel to drive another small generator ??

I built a very quick model(pic) but I need to tear it apart and make it much bigger so I can get a larger weight and longer arm on it. The top is the drive motor it just pushes the shaft around with a bar, the shaft is allowed to turn freely as the axis shifts and the falling weight adds the torque. Which is transmitted through a universal joint to the (dc motor as)generator below which is hooked to a LED. I do notice some interesting effects with it but it's not at the point where I can make any definite conclusion whether pro or con.

Hi Arto,

Really nice drawings.

Hi MSCoffman,

I think you are right on the point of two gyroscopes. If we look at Skinners machine just as motion it is similar to a mechanized Larmor precession. It could be simplified to a one way pendulum by placing a spherical joint in the center as a pivot and having a offset magnetic weight driven on the top portion while the bottom acts a counterweight. It would be like a one way orbital lever, to take power off we would surround it with coils but Lenz law would introduce nutation to the orbit(Keplers law of areas). Through conservation of angular momentum it would force the lever back inward giving it a slingshot effect from the offset weight (spiral path) which may aid in output as it reaches the next coil. The challenge is driving the offset weight with a balanced system otherwise the orbit will be elliptical and the spherical bearings would suffer mechanical fatigue.

Another idea that came to mind while building the Lego model was finding a way to simplify the idea and remove a lot of the mechanical structure. The thought of building a plate with a shaft through it then just pulsing the coils in sequence to shift the axis. I attached a picture that shows the idea better.