Hogan and Jakovlewich overunity generator

[truesearch]

@hanon:


It's not clear to me if the center "grid" is one continuous coil? How do you have yours?


sincerely,
truesearch

[hanon]

 
Hi all,

I have translated the whole patent text from the Hogan Jakovlewich document into english in order that anyone may read it and understand it.

Please have a look. Really interesting !!!

Regards,

hanon

[hanon]

Hi all,

I think that the principle under Hogan and Jakovlewich generator is the same as in one of the Clemente Figuera´s patent. I am referring to Figuera´s patent Nr. 30376 (year 1902), the one with the rotary induced circuit and stationary internal and external electromagnets (Link to pdf).In this patent a SINGLE MOVING WIRE crosses between TWO OPPOSITE MAGNET POLES. According to Figuera´s patent text this configuration produces electricity without dragging the movement of the induced wire.

The key for avoiding dragging is the use of two opposite poles to generate the induction in the intermediate wire:  N -- | -- S  ; in contrast with common generators with just one pole exposed to the induced wire.

       1- A wire is settle into a moving magnet system, between two opposite poles: North and South

       2- As a consequence an induce current will appear in the wire

       3- This induced current generates a magnetic field (B) around the wire

       4- One pole (let´s say  N pole) will repel the wire because of magnetic repulsion with the magnetic field in the wire (creating a drag). But the other pole ( S pole in our example) will attract the wire (magnetic attraction between the S pole and the wire)

       5- Therefore the net sum of both forces (repulsion + attraction) will be null and the wire finally will be moved without any drag while at the same time will generate an induced current.

       6- The force of repulsion suffered in one disc (magnet 1) and the force of attraction done in the other disc (magnet 2) will be transmited to the common shaft. Therefore the net sum over the shaft will be cancelled and the machine will rotate without any drag.

I think it is as simple as explained here. Figuera also stated that he could not believe how such a simple principle had not been used before him.

Hogan and Jakovlewich patent requires two opposite magnets instead of just one. All Figuera´s patents are based also on the induction created between two electromagnets, instead of common induction with just one pole exposed. IMHO, This is the key of his discovery.

I attach an sketch with the representation of this principle. Please study this sketch and tell your comments. Both patents (Figuera and Hogan & Jakovlewich) share the same principle, and both patent are representing an overunity generator withoudt dragging. Please have a look into Figuera thread in the next link:

http://www.overunity.com/12794/re-inventing-the-wheel-part1-clemente_figuera-the-infinite-energy-machine/msg413741/#msg413741

[antijon]

Hanon, you really find some amazing stuff. Thanks for translating and sharing so much information.

After reviewing the patent and going over the Lorentz force associated with it, I decided to draw my interpretation of how it should be made. I noticed in the patent, the final drawing with the "grid" and the + and -, I think they purposely drew it to be misleading... as we know with a homopolar generator, the current will only move radially, and, if it were made as it was drawn would produce no results. However, with a rectangular coil mounted coaxially on the shaft, current will be generated. The coil would resemble a flat, rectangular, pancake coil.

This makes me laugh at all the time I spent thinking about homopolar generators and trying to achieve more voltage. This design is so simple, and stackable, and because voltage is related to velocity, this could really be a powerful generator.

About your thoughts on a dragless rotor... You may be right. To me, it seems the fields ahead of the wire would drag it, while the fields behind the wire would accelerate it. If the two are equal, which they are, they should cancel. Just my thoughts.

[hanon]

I think the easier implementation is just with one simple grid (normal grid) between two disc. Each disc having the same pole in its whole area.

This is a disc with all N poles and the opposite with S poles in order to produce DC

Figures in patent some times try to mislead. I agree with you that the "grid" in the patent sketch must be wrong. The important part is not the figures but the device described in the claims which is the part that has legal validity

Regards