Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[TheoriaApophasis]

At last some fresh air all that EGO and a daft empty attempt to re-write the law of truth the TERM DIALETRIC INERTSHIA IS NOW A DODO HAHAHA !!! But the term space time curvature is what give directional force to the effect and that is gravity !!

You are confusing 2 WHOLLY diff terms dielectric and  dialectic  !!!!!  ROFL

There is NO "space time curvature"     these are FIELD pressure curvatures       ROFL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!   


You are, as most are, reifying the POSTERIOR ATTRIBUTE of fields,  that being space  AS the Principle.......its NOT.     Tesla and Heaviside  BOTH SAID THIS


See appendix A, vol 1 of Heaviside  "ELECTROMAGNETIC THEORY"   its at the END of Vol 1.


Dielectricity terminates INTO/AS mass creation in galactic and stellar formation JUST as electricity terminates into magnetism.    So, wrong again.

There is and opposing forces between each stack so I had to tape them closer each try .. When I got to the 5th turn and the stacks were all touching something strange happened and I wrote it down as a field burst where a release of flux spread all over the room and the magnets lost the ability to attract the armature . I had to take each stack and isolate them for 4 hours for the field to return to normal .   

Great, you discovered the dielectric inertial plane.   Hurray.   

I monitored the position of each experiment and noticed that a full cycle of the moon had to pass before a bubble could be set up in the same spot .

Yes, thats because dielectricity and gravity are linked in ways I WILL NOT EXPLAIN HERE

But they are linked in the same fashion as Electricity is to magnetism.     Congrats on finding that out   (so did I , a looong time ago)

Now that is enough of poetry ! which one of you will confirm with me a real magnetic vortex ?? or are you all just pretending to experiment .

I AM and HAVE BEEN experimenting my ass off. 

     




[/quote]

[TheoriaApophasis]

DIALETRIC INERTIA WHAT A LOAD OF TRIPE
     

Tell that to Tesla, Steinmetz, Heaviside, JC Maxwell       ALL of which refer to >>>>>>>dielectric inertia  <<<<<<<


EVEN IN many modern electrical engineering texts, dielectricity is called  "ELECTRICAL INERTIA"



You're refuted, little boy.   


Proving 100%   , you know JACK,  have READ JACK, and are full of it.

[TheoriaApophasis]

Try this trick with the magnet in a zero g environment like space and it can not work no gravity no spin on the magnet

Let me correct your insane stupidity here   .    NO HUMAN EVER has been in a  "Zero G" environment.



You are confusing EXTREMELY VELOCITY in a  ZERO-DRAG low earth orbit (= PLENTY OF GRAVITY)  with     "Zero gravity"


The "former" space shuttle didn't "rocket back to earth" fool, .... it decelerates from nozzles which places it on a return trajectory to earth.


Im even pretty fucking sure there is gravity even AT THE POINT of Pluto...........     yeah, thats the case.


drats, foiled again!!!    

[picowatt]

Modelling compounded magnets is:

A: a pain in the ass


B: its hard enough showing (not meaning you) weak minded ass-scratching monkeys how a NORMAL magnet works, ..........ergo no need (at this time) to complicate it for their squishy little brians

Wow TA, do you see anything in your response that would be construed by most as arrogance and condescension?

Personally, I find some of what you have to say intriguing (as I do most non-conventional theories), but I have yet to see or read anything that I would consider as "Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex".  To the contrary, most of the "proofs" you have presented can have alternate and quite conventional explanations.  The "proof" would be in ruling out these alternate more conventional explanations through additional experiments devised specifically for that purpose (null experiments).

All seasoned experimentalists learn that when an experiment provides a non-conventional result, or produces a result in apparent agreement with a non-conventional hypothesis, the real work has only just begun.  It is the multitude of experiments that follow, devised to disprove that positive result, that bring one much closer to the truth.  All too often we see individuals way too eager to accept the first positive experimental result as proof of something, without the required due diligence performed by those experimentalists to prove themselves wrong.

I am, however, intrigued by the results observed in Tinman's spinning/non-spinning bubbles experiment using a PM and EM.  So much so that I have already considered a dozen or so null experiments that may or may not provide further support for the proposed magnetic vortex theory.  If this were a more rational thread with cooler heads, discussing those experiments might actually be a pleasant and productive expenditure of time.

However, when individuals guard their belief systems with the fervor of religious fanaticism and cast aside more conventional technical and scientific responses with, or in concert with, condescension, arrogance, demeaning tones and accusations of being a shill, further discussion can only be an unpleasant and non-productive waste of time.

There really is no need for it.  A sound theory should be able to stand on its own without all the emotional tripe.   

As my schedule allows, I hope to perform additional experiments I have considered regarding Tinman's spinning bubbles.

PW
     

[TheoriaApophasis]

Wow TA, do you see anything in your response that would be construed by most as arrogance and condescension?

If you dont like my personality, fine, dont really care.     This isnt a HOOKER trying to win a "pretty contest"    OK?

, but I have yet to see or read anything that I would consider as "Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex".  To the contrary, most of the "proofs" you have presented can have alternate and quite conventional explanations.  The "proof" would be in ruling out these alternate more conventional explanations through additional experiments devised specifically for that purpose (null experiments).

Good, Im glad you are blind, HOWEVER I have 9 diff. testing methods to write and make videos on.   Dont give a damn what you believe. 

All seasoned experimentalists learn that when an experiment provides a non-conventional result.

Nice classical Greek skepticism,  now go PISS OFF and experiment yourself son.      "non conventional" my goddamn ass.

I experiment, examine, use logic and retroduction...... Pedal your Greek Skepticism DOWN THE ROAD

Many people for long time have observed vortex divergent and convergent patterns.

As my schedule allows, I hope to perform additional experiments I have considered regarding Tinman's spinning bubbles.

GOOD, go experiment,  and stop flapping your lips.......Im in the middle of more experiments myself.