Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Crystal Cell Research for Experimenter

Started by plengo, October 24, 2014, 11:36:59 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

jonfrommanahawkin1

I have found that there is an equilibrium in anode and cathode sizes where if you increase the anode size and not increase the cathode size the total current reaches a point where the size is no longer beneficial. However increasing the cathode size and not changing the anode size will double and triple the total current in comparison.

But on the topic of materials I have found the more conductive the anode material is the higher the amperage will be. But the voltage is usually limited to its galvanic potential

As an example mg is -1.50
where aluminum is -1.0
and gold silver and carbon (graphite respectively) is +2.0

It all really boils down to its  internal resistance and potential (respectively)

Jon

tgraca

I built 21 ibpointless2 batteries on a piece of wood about a year ago to test the inconsistencies in the builds - what worked better and worse. From my notes after testing and dissecting them "cathode and anode further apart worked better" - if you look at the DiveFlyFish video, you will notice that the smaller cathode was further away from the anode and that could be the performance difference and why it shows much more resistance.

The problem with building cells to be used together is that it's near impossible to get them exactly to specs, so I tend to go with single cells and tune them to the circuit I am using, or visa versa. Here's a fun pic of the beginning of the build of the 21 ibpointless2 batteries! - teo

http://offthegridsolar.net/Solar/REC_images/IB_Pointless2-21_Cells.jpg

plengo

Cool test there. When you have the distance between the poles, do you have more electrolyte also?

tgraca

Quote from: plengo on November 04, 2014, 11:52:14 AM
Cool test there. When you have the distance between the poles, do you have more electrolyte also?
Not necessarily, but my notes suggest more electrolyte was better. I think that would be a good test.

tgraca

Quote from: jonfrommanahawkin1 on November 03, 2014, 09:40:33 PM
But on the topic of materials I have found the more conductive the anode material is the higher the amperage will be. But the voltage is usually limited to its galvanic potential

I think graphite and magnesium would be an interesting test. I haven't done that yet... see...

http://offthegridsolar.net/Solar/REC_images/AnodeCathode.gif

Teo