What's wrong with this

[tinman]

  I have no doubt that ultimately Tinman will observe and accept the truth.

I hope this go's both way's Mark,despite what you may believe physics is trying to tell you..

[MarkE]

I hope this go's both way's Mark,despite what you may believe physics is trying to tell you..

The data always tells the story.

[tinman]

I decided to spend the $60,00 odd today,and throw together a quick device to show the effect taking place. The workings of the internals of this vessel are a very quick throw together job,and quite inefficient for the size of the vessel. But none the less,you can see what happens when i apply power to the internal working's. The effect is small,but it is there. I have run the test 11 times now,and the results are always the same. The one problem with running the device out of the water is the heat created,although it is very little with this one,as the P/in is only about 2 watts. Higher power levels produce much faster and higher result's in weight loss,but cooling is also needed when the power levels are that high.

It may be time to open up your mind's,and give rise to the possability that man hasnt tried all there is to try,regardless of his 2000 years experiance with buoyancy.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JhPVk0JaweA

[MileHigh]

Tinman:

I am not here to argue about the buoyancy issue you are discussing, but rather to comment on your experimental procedure.

Why didn't you place the device when not powered on the scale and wait a few minutes to see what happens?  You have to rule out the possibility that the scale readout will drift over time.

Also, why not put the device on a higher pedestal so that you can keep the electrical wires at least say nine inches away from the scale to rule out any electrical interference from the wires affecting the electronic guts of the scale?

MileHigh

[tinman]

Tinman:

I am not here to argue about the buoyancy issue you are discussing, but rather to comment on your experimental procedure.

Why didn't you place the device when not powered on the scale and wait a few minutes to see what happens?  You have to rule out the possibility that the scale readout will drift over time.

Also, why not put the device on a higher pedestal so that you can keep the electrical wires at least say nine inches away from the scale to rule out any electrical interference from the wires affecting the electronic guts of the scale?

MileHigh

This is as far as im going with this here MH,but yes,you are right-we shouldnt ruel anything out.
Some things we see,and some things we dont. I have spent enough time and money on a backward step to where my (and others)reserch is at on this effect at the moment. In time to come the blindfolds will be lifted,and a new light will shine on what possabilities lie ahead. There is no claim of any OU event,nor will there ever be one-but more an untapped power source provided to us by nature. The one thing i can say for sure is that despite 2000 years of buoyancy experience,they havnt tried everything yet,and that holds true with fluids reactions with electrical current. Maybe people should look a little further into makeing spirits a little more electrically conductive,or something like that.