Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[minnie]

   Cap zero, synchro,
                              seems to me that it's the threat from good science that causes
people to "run off"!
     If nature didn't stick to the rules nothing could be relied on. I agree that there are
anomalies but they stick to their rules as well.
   A challenge to what is so far understood needs extraordinary repeatable proof.
The smaller a thing gets the greater the accuracy needed to demonstrate it. How
about we have a one milliwatt challenge. Has anyone seen an actual OU. device,
however small?
                 John.

[hanon]

 MileHigh, 

Congratulations!!  You killed this thread. Good Job!!!  You are a great professional .

[TinselKoala]

(In response to my  question about the schematic above)

Well, transistor Q2 (drain - source) is shortened, because 0V is the same as GND.

The circuit still works because Q2 is not necessary.

I'm not sure. Does EMJunkie mean the "minus"  output terminal of his power supply, or the ground terminal, when he indicates "0V" ? My own regulated bench supplies do not connect the "black" or "minus" output terminal to chassis/earth ground unless they are strapped deliberately. I interpreted the schematic to mean the "minus" terminal, not the ground terminal.

What about the FG's "black" lead, shown connected to ground?

Yes, the circuit works, but I don't know at this point whether the lower mosfet is switching, shorted just as you say, or permanently ON.

I watched the video, interesting. Thank you for posting the link, the video is not visible in his video list on YouTube. May be YouTube is slow updating the lists.

Greetings, Conrad

When I watched it it was indicated as "unlisted" which means you need to know the URL to see it, it deliberately does not show on the list of videos.

[TinselKoala]

MileHigh, 

Congratulations!!  You killed this thread. Good Job!!!  You are a great professional .

The thread is not "dead" and MH didn't kill it.

What may have "driven" EMJunkie away is the same thing we have seen time and time again: Someone makes a claim of OU performance and then cannot deliver evidence for the claim in the form of solid measurements, so they have no choice but to fade away in embarrassment. After delivering the usual insults to the critics, of course.

Meanwhile, others continue to build and test, and are able to duplicate all the _actual_ data from the claimant, but still don't find any evidence of OU in their work.

Where is _your_ evidence in support of EMJunkie's claims, then, hanon?

[MileHigh]

MileHigh, 

Congratulations!!  You killed this thread. Good Job!!!  You are a great professional .

Hanon, Propellanttech:

Don't give me this nonsense about "killing the thread."  If people make claims then other people have the right to ask them questions about those claims.  In fact, Chris didn't actually name me when he made his "run away" posting.   If you had some guts and used your head you too would be asking Chris for evidence of his claim.  Don't you give me this nonsensical demonization of people that are simply asking perfectly legitimate questions.

What are we here for?  We are here to explore and that means that you don't just shut up and say nothing like a mindless drone when someone makes a claim that would win him a Nobel Prize if it was actually true.  Nor do I have to do experiments in Electronics 001 to "prove" anything.  The burden of proof is on the claimant and so far the claimant has presented zero evidence to back up his claims.

MileHigh