Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[propellanttech]

Yes, that is rather the problem isn't it. But it's not your fault, because he has not provided the measurements that support his overunity claims.

EMJunkie has presented in this thread and the pdf: Claims without measurements in support of the claims. Misunderstanding of simple principles of electronics and measurement. Nonsensical schematics without clarification. An attitude of  non-cooperation and false superiority, even when demonstrably wrong.

So you tell me then. What ARE you looking for when you build something according to Chris's design?

Will you duplicate the nonsensical mosfet and current-monitoring arrangement in the "Exp1 and 2" schematics? What measurements will you accept as indications of 1.7x OU? How will you know that you aren't just wasting your time, spinning your wheels? Do you have the necessary experience to use an oscilloscope properly, to avoid instrument groundloops, to interpret waveforms without relying on "numbers in boxes" from DSOs.... or do you just push the "Auto" button and display scope measurements that have nothing to do with the real issues at hand?

And by the way... there certainly ARE transformers with one loop of wire as primary and/or secondary... even autotransformers with just a single loop and a tap. For just one example, my wireless power transmitter/receiver system is essentially an aircore transformer with a single loop as primary and another, distant, single loop as secondary. For another, the shaded-pole motors that are all around us use one-turn high current loops as "secondary" : the shading coil. If one doesn't understand a single loop's electromagnetic interactions, one won't be able to understand what happens when many loops are stacked, as in bucking or aiding inductor windings.  For a good example of this, see EMJunkie's pdf for Experiments 1 and 2, where he demonstrates that heavy inductances respond at lower frequencies than lighter inductances, and seems to completely  misunderstand why.

TK

I'll find what I find, and whatever it is, it will be wisdom. That is what I'm looking for.

As for experience....I have plenty, and I'm not going to spell that out for you. It's really not important to this discussion. If I waste my time building the circuit, it is mine to waste. If you want to get into a penile  measuring contest about who has the most usable experience......you may find I'm a good competitor.

Will you show me a manufactured transformer with one loop? I didn't say winding. I said loop. Don't confuse what I said, with what you think I said. When you start winding, things get perplexing about loop configuration. Don't go with the book method.....that doesn't work with someone who knows not everything is in a book. Also, anything made by you doesn't necessarily fit theory, and an antenna is not a transformer. Their purpose is different, you even stated as much with "transmitter/receiver"....so......... Loops in motors are not in a transformer.  A flyback could possibly use one single loop, but that is a different beast than we are talking about, even then.....it would be rare, but I guess I'll state I may be wrong on that one transformer, which has nothing to do with the current debate.

I also noticed your coils are not wound orthocyclic .....may I ask why?

As for EMJ's items, I can't really defend or accuse him of what he did, or didn't do. The point is moot, for he is no longer here.

James

[synchro1]

Woo!  Hoo!  So we have another replication going!   I hope that Conrad will do one and wasn't too turned off by the bickering.  If he does then we will have three replications going!

@MileHigh,

Conrad's just one of your boot Licking stooges. He scored a 5 to 1 input to output COP on his wireless transmitter, probably because he forgot to wind serial bifilar coils.

[MileHigh]

I never misrepresented anything you asshole. Give me one example where I misrepresented something. Nor have I ever claimed anything without accurate evidence. You're just completly full of shit.

Your whole "delayed Lenz effect hyper-velocity super-duper Lenz propulsion" threads are gross misrepresentations of reality.  If the EEVblog guy ever read them and made a response video you would not be happy.

[MileHigh]

Conrad's one of your boot Licking stooges.

No he isn't.

[synchro1]

Your whole "delayed Lenz effect hyper-velocity super-duper Lenz propulsion" threads are gross misrepresentations of reality.  If the EEVblog guy ever read them and made a response video you would not be happy.

You have your head buried one MileHigh up your ass.