Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[Jimboot]

All that aside-->will anyone be entering the pulse motor build off this year?-->if Russ hold's one .
Should be fun.

As long as you don't! Ahem as the inaugural winner of said PMBO I will re enter. You maybe interested in a little universal motor device I'm working on. >:-D

[TinselKoala]

I know what happened,and to me that is all that matters.

And I know that, in spite of the measurements, that your device does not actually put out more power than it takes in from the power supply you have shown. And to me that is all that matters.

It would be almost trivial for you to prove me wrong... just daisy-chain a few units together, each one running from only the power supplied by the previous one in the chain, with the "excess" power running some small loads at each stage. Use the mechanical power output of the several motors running to drive a small generator that can provide enough power to run the first unit in the chain so that it can be disconnected from its startup power supply. Do the work and post the video anonymously, that's not hard to do. Or communicate privately with someone who cannot be reached by the people who frightened you into folding up, and let that person do it.

But we know already that you won't be doing any of those simple things, don't we.

I'm sorry if I seem hostile to you, but really, I am getting tired of all this BS. "Look, I have an OU device right here on my workbench, but I can't show it to you or prove it properly because of threats, etc. yet I am happy to keep on posting and discussing why I cannot discuss it." Right.

[Jimboot]

And I know that, in spite of the measurements, that your device does not actually put out more power than it takes in from the power supply you have shown. And to me that is all that matters.

It would be almost trivial for you to prove me wrong... just daisy-chain a few units together, each one running from only the power supplied by the previous one in the chain, with the "excess" power running some small loads at each stage. Use the mechanical power output of the several motors running to drive a small generator that can provide enough power to run the first unit in the chain so that it can be disconnected from its startup power supply. Do the work and post the video anonymously, that's not hard to do. Or communicate privately with someone who cannot be reached by the people who frightened you into folding up, and let that person do it.

But we know already that you won't be doing any of those simple things, don't we.

I'm sorry if I seem hostile to you, but really, I am getting tired of all this BS. "Look, I have an OU device right here on my workbench, but I can't show it to you or prove it properly because of threats, etc. yet I am happy to keep on posting and discussing why I cannot discuss it." Right.

Do you have a theory of where the measurements are in error then?

[tinman]

And I know that, in spite of the measurements, that your device does not actually put out more power than it takes in from the power supply you have shown. And to me that is all that matters.

It would be almost trivial for you to prove me wrong... just daisy-chain a few units together, each one running from only the power supplied by the previous one in the chain, with the "excess" power running some small loads at each stage. Use the mechanical power output of the several motors running to drive a small generator that can provide enough power to run the first unit in the chain so that it can be disconnected from its startup power supply. Do the work and post the video anonymously, that's not hard to do. Or communicate privately with someone who cannot be reached by the people who frightened you into folding up, and let that person do it.

But we know already that you won't be doing any of those simple things, don't we.

I'm sorry if I seem hostile to you, but really, I am getting tired of all this BS. "Look, I have an OU device right here on my workbench, but I can't show it to you or prove it properly because of threats, etc. yet I am happy to keep on posting and discussing why I cannot discuss it." Right.

Of course i can talk and post as i wish-there was no gag order,or threats of any kind. I was simply asked to abide by some rules !nicely! ,and as long as i do,then i may post what i like. There is really no need to carry out this piggyback experiment of yours TK,it's nothing more than a waste of time,money and equipment. So many people think that everything has to be difficult,when in fact it is much simpler than that. A solid state version would be good too-no noise to put up with. If only Tom had shown how he really had the PM's and coils arranged,then i think many more people would have been much happier with the outcome. If only they had tried shearing the magnetic field in stead of pushing against it.

I once seen a video on here or on OUR(i think it was either Luc or Steve Jones that posted it) that showed just how little power it takes to neutralize a PM's magnetic field. Then there was FarmHand that on this very thread stated just how a small amount of power could be added to the field windings of this type of motor to reduce the needed power by a factor of nearly 10x,and yet gain torque from the output. It really is not my fault that you guys cannot piece together all these things,and make a working device.

TK
If you spent less time trying to debunk everything,and more time putting all the pieces together,then you would be one of a few who would succeed.

[synchro1]

@Tinselkoala,

Quote from Tinman:

"If you spent less time trying to debunk everything,and more time putting all the pieces together".

Farmhand's feeding extra power into the power coil and getting 10x gain dividend. Has anyone ever tried this with a normal pulse coil? What would happen if we charged the "Ozzie Motor" coils with an auxiliary current? The auxiliary current from the second battery should be passed home to the primary source battery. Any assistance to the rotor power at all would add up to pure "Gravy".