Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[l0stf0x]

Hi guys!
Just a little update. I have no result to share yet but i have some spare time tonight and i want to let you know about my setup. I use a reed switch to trigger the primary. I try the primary poc in a bucking way but have no good result... So i put the 2 primary coil the same way (North upside) and it seem to work. For now i have a hard time to set the magnet for it to maintain it to run... but when it run it seem to have a nice output.

To be continue...

Lostfox, does your primary are north and south upside?

Hey Wistiti , Nice setup.. (try to eliminate the gap between the secondaries coils to get better results)
Yes north and south upside, the other way does not work at all.

I still build and do testings with different (coil) setups. Trying to understand why and where is the key to POC.
I have nice gain but no "wow" results yet too Wistiti,
I can charge other battery (a bit faster than drive battery) but cannot charge the drive battery yet.

Until now, All my setups that use bifilar for primary have less output than those with Primary in POC arrangement.
Also the POC coils (if no core is used) need to be very very close to each other (in the same spool if possible). Eliminate the space between them to raise the gain.
The secondaries need to magnetically communicate to each other in order to get overunity.

From all testings, I end up to a different setup idea..
I am about to build a more advanced setup. I will be back..

[wistiti]

Ok thank you!
I will wait to see your next setup...

[EMJunkie]

@Wistiti and LostFox - The Fields will Oppose, as the Current in one Partnered Output Coil will be in the opposite direction to the other. That is, if you measure the Current on each Coil. Remember our past experiments: See below Image.

If there is no Voltage Potential, there can be no Current, this we have also covered.

I have some work to share soon also. Got my parts and building now.

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

[EMJunkie]

It is true, there are many smart people here.

When I was in discovery, which, by the way, I am still in, I always wondered, where was the secret to the mysterious Negative Energy, what were we missing, and where does this magic lay. Where was this strange form of Induction, how could just Inductors and Capacitors make a machine run itself and a series of other devices?

I searched high and Low!

It was right in front of our Eyes all along. Sir Richard Feynman made a comment some time back, I always thought it was odd:

So you see, that the real Energy change is the Negative of the Mechanical Work, and that's why I keep writing this as E_Artificial, because the true Energy of the world, is the Negative of E_Artificial, in this case is μ.B - I just want to point out that difference in Sign, but that's just interesting.

This is such an IMPORTANT statement!!!

What does this say, really?

It says, the Energy we "Generate" with our "Electrical Generators" is E_Artificial, the opposite to the True Energy of the World which is -E_Artificial.

What is the significance here? There is a massive difference, Lenz's Law is reversed.

What we see as Electrical Energy currently, is this E_Artificial, this is Electromagnetic Induction, but the Reverse of it -E_Artificial, is the True Energy of the World, where Energy begets Energy, Yin Yang.

So many smart people seem to completely forget about this simple, well known, phenomena!

I show you above, how this works, this is the Yin Yang of Electromagnetic Induction.

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

[Meta]

 -E_{Artificial and} E_Artificial



The equation "5 in 1 household divided, 3 against 2 and 2 against 3", found in the New Testament,

(Note: Is a mathematical formula embedded into the narrative by someone who knew of the properties of quantum physics as we are beginning to discover. The embedders of this information go far, far back beyond any Hebrew civilization, beyond Phonician, beyond Cannanite, to perhaps Sumerian civilization or more).

"There is a total of 6 forces reduced to 5 (6 / 5 ratio) because of the   dual role of Mother/Mother-in-law, divided - / - =  +.

According to the custom, + was assigned to male    = 2+
And.................  - was assigned to female = 4-
6 factors in all and considering the dual role, changes - to +, it now   becomes 5 forces:

1 = 3 positive (+), 2 negative (-), or
1 = 1 force divided that is apparently a negative force but is    actually a positive force operating against 2 manifestly negative   forces, and with 2 manifestly positive forces".


"Only if you understand that a negative number self-divided, is   equivalent to a positive number, can you resolve the number of    forces (5) in one's house, with the number of signs (6). Furthermore,   the above matrix of forces give rise to 12 signs:

8 positive, 4 negative (Note: This is B. Fuller again).

Still finer divisions of forces underlie the matrix (field). A force   that involves "doubly stated double negatives" giving rise to a    negative effect which is of positive value in life. (See "negative   entropy" statement above, by Schrodinger). This negative effect in   life is expressed as "nothing positive" (0+),


(Note: 0+ is = tao, holy ghost, space, negative entropy, zero and the "S" between the yin/yang symbols, and of course, neutrality. The negative effect Harold speaks about here, expressed as "nothing positive", feels as if he is pointing to the neutralization that life delivers to us all, doesn't it? What do you think?).

Shining Stranger, pg. 186.       

1 / 1/1 = 1/1 =   "5 in 1 household divided".

3/2 x 2/3 = 1    is "3 against 2 and 2 against 3", 1 quantum.

also,

0/0 = 1 - 1 / 1 - 1 = 1

(Note: All are redundant, repeated or iterated as in the process of fractal construction).

   

  The fractional expression disappears and 1 appears. "Something"    in life inverts to bring 1 whole".


  "Expresses the Fitzgerald contraction- 2 measures of 1 posed    against each other.

This is the "unequal principle", binary growth, or the logarithmic    spiral".

  "The maximum working against the minimum. Light sometimes    takes the longest path. Both processes operate at once".



(Note: Light sometimes takes the longest path simply because 1/2 of it is inverted-reversed-mirror imaged-traveling backwards, like unto Terrance Mc Kenna's Timewave or Marko Rodin's bi-directional toroidal sphere).

   

  Asymmetry of "1". Parity (distinguishing between odd and even    number). If 2 integers are both even (2, 2) or both odd (3, 3) =    same parity.  If one is even and the other odd (2, 3) = opposite    parity.

What applies to ones least measure (the neutrino) must also apply   to the greatest measure (universe). Self-conserving     principles of 3 / 2 x 2 / 3 = 1 represents greater/lesser systems,   left/right handedness.

3/2 represents action.   Loss in one is
2/3 represents reaction.  Gain in the other.

   

"It was discovered that the neutrino, the least, first (1) particle, is a  structure with true spatial asymmetry.

"1" = 5 points. Parity is opposite. Plus aspect 3 / 2, minus aspect 2 / 3   cross(+) action. The neutrino is also symmetric".

   

Yang said, "If one performs a mirror reflection and  converts all   matter into antimatter, then physical laws remain unchanged".   

He also asked, "Why is it necessary in order to have symmetry, to   combine the operation of,

  switching matter and antimatter with
a mirror reflection".

   

"This 5th dimension (5th level of structure, 5th power) is seamless,   positive (+) and leads from negative to a plus situation (nothing to   something)",

(Note: This 5th level sounds like the big bang cosmogony at first, then thousands of millions of little bangs of transformation. But Harold, here seems to be speaking of human reality evolving into the 5th dimension. Its hard to tell if this applies to human reality or to cosmology isn't it? Let me say, that the two are not separated. They both are from one and the same Life Force but one is a reflection of the other).

"through thousands of millions of transformations, therefore, change  is not the single reality, to the contrary, positive being is the single  reality (I Am) in the midst of these changes".

   

"The neutral, redundant power of 1 is the most penetrating, as is the  neutron, the arrangement of opposite forces giving rise to 50%   redundancy. In communication, the English language is 50% redundant  in that 1 / 2 of what is said could be omitted and the basic    information could be conveyed and understood".

"Electrical neutrality may depend upon forces that are not 50%   redundant as in this grouping (+ - + - +) for if the signs are canceled   to zero (0 + 0) the arrangement becomes 50% redundant in neutral   signs (force) so that neutrality rather than positive charge would be  communicated although the positive value (+), in the original    expression of signs is necessary to give rise to (0 + 0), is greater".

(Note: Can you see now, what happens inside a bifilar, counterwound coil? Or, what Tom Bearden is communicating? If your thinking that neutral nothing is called scalar, your thinking correctly. And if you counterwind 2 pure scalar potentials against each other, will you get an even higher form of energy? And what higher energy would we get if we opposed two products of two scalar cancellations? Thats called phase conjugating them so they also cancel, but, I would wear my safety glasses if I were you. I would also wear heavy armor!).

"That is, what is communicated may depend upon what is 50%    redundant and what is not. Perhaps 'mammon' cannot communicate   itself as it truly is because its real nature is hidden behind a    redundancy of neutral energy which is all it can communicate".

"2 cannot be a mirror image of 3 nor can the negative force be equal   to the positive force. Asymmetry is the basis of opposites. Positive   is the more. One aspect of positive force arises through the division   of a negative matrix (field). But in universe, a negative aspect is   more apparent".

   

"1" is not a number, 1 is the measure of number. Thus,
"2" would be the measure number of negative energy, the lesser, and,
"3" would be the measure number of positive energy, the greater".

"If opposite types of energy (3 / 2 x 2 / 3) are related to "1' whole, it   must begin by relating them to the least neutral particle (the    neutrino: an indestructible union of positive/negative energy). Its opposite force must be seen as (3+) aspects engaging
(2-) aspects to give (5) upon which (1) operates. It is self-   conserving. This "iota" of energy (3/2) is neutral, and within it the   positive outweighs the negative. 3 / 2 x 2 / 3 says there is no simple   "1" in manifestation. There is "1" and "1" .

"2 arrangements of positive / negative energy". As B. Fuller would say,   "AAB and ABB modules", giving rise to 2 kinds of neutrinos".


   

"The secrets hidden from the foundation of the world", (a bible    quote), may be:

  Manifest positive energy outweighs the negative energy.

Space, which appears negative in its "non-being" is actually     positive-being, so that space repels and thus supports     manifest energy within it which (energy) can operate only upon   the matrix (field).

Within the whole (macro or micro), positive-being outweighs    (outmeasures) negative-being therefore,

A. neither matrix (field) energy nor manifest energy can      completely occupy space.

B. and matter in ground state cannot communicate positive-being,

C. matrix (field) energy cannot communicate as negative-being    because

D. each type being is redundant only in terms of neutral      energy".


Shining Stranger
By Harold
232. H23