Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[picowatt]

MileHigh,

Well, what I can show, and have already proven, is that the way "You" are being taught to measure things does not account for the real information in the Circuits right in front of you!

Hey ION,

Yes, understand what youre saying. But the scope sees this voltage spike in the secondary Circuit! Just moving the Scope Ground cable shouldn't remove these Spikes. The Scope sees them there initially.

Does this make sense?

We are still missing something here, we are missing 1.3 Watts from the Input Power Source, to the Output, this cant currently be accounted for!

I see the removal of important Wave data on the output, and a loss of 1.3 Watts, there is issues that are not currently explained.


So Maybe the Cat in Jail, and the nice little Poem is a little too premature MileHigh. Maybe it may end up being you with Egg on your face!

Lets try to work this out, not squabble about this!

EMJ,

You have yet to show or prove anything unique.  Even your "bad form" attitude is nothing new.

There is indeed an opportunity for many to learn something.  You should take advantage of that opportunity as well.

Arrogance, insults, foul language and your threats regarding the privacy of others, do not in any way support your effort.

Chill...  Seek out the truth, not a victory...

TK has made some very interesting videos regarding the effects of inductance on just an inch or two of wire with regard to spikes and ringing (the old "a wire is not always just a wire" stuff).  Perhaps he will repost links.

You can look for those spikes, but when found, they are usually due to inductances ringing that have such high impedance at the frequency involved that they add negligible power. 

Before you start telling others they were taught to make measurements incorrectly, I suggest you wait until you see and learn how and why they make their measurements as they do.

PW

[EMJunkie]

EMJ,

You have yet to show or prove anything unique.  Even your "bad form" attitude is nothing new.

There is indeed an opportunity for many to learn something.  You should take advantage of that opportunity as well.

Arrogance, insults, foul language and your threats regarding the privacy of others, do not in any way support your effort.

Chill...  Seek out the truth, not a victory...

TK has made some very interesting videos regarding the effects of inductance on just an inch or two of wire with regard to spikes and ringing (the old "a wire is not always just a wire" stuff).  Perhaps he will repost links.

You can look for those spikes, but when found, they are usually due to inductances ringing that have such high impedance at the frequency involved that they add negligible power. 

Before you start telling others they were taught to make measurements incorrectly, I suggest you wait until you see and learn how and why they make their measurements as they do.

PW

Calm down would ya P 

[PIH123]

Lets try to work this out, not squabble about this!

Two things.

1. I thought you weren't interested in measurements.

2. I thought you had this all figured out after 16 years and were here to teach.


So, if #1. Just let others figure where you screwed up.
We actually passed that point on page 7, but what the hey.


Or if #2. Stop being so cryptic and tell everyone where they are going wrong.
A definitive statement as to which ONE circuit to test.
The one out of ten will work stuff makes you look like you are hoping someone else can get it to work for you.
What were the results of your 9 out of 10.
How was 1 out of 10 different. (I bet there were gongs involved)

[EMJunkie]

Two things.

1. I thought you weren't interested in measurements.

2. I thought you had this all figured out after 16 years and were here to teach.


So, if #1. Just let others figure where you screwed up.
We actually passed that point on page 7, but what the hey.


Or if #2. Stop being so cryptic and tell everyone where they are going wrong.
A definitive statement as to which ONE circuit to test.
The one out of ten will work stuff makes you look like you are hoping someone else can get it to work for you.
What were the results of your 9 out of 10.
How was 1 out of 10 different. (I bet there were gongs involved)

I thought you of all would not jump to conclusions and assumptions - Don't be the Judge here P, maybe instead, try to answer the very simple question I asked!

How is it, that from the 0 Voltage Terminal, to the Output, we see 3.3 Watts, but from the 0 Voltage Terminal to the + Voltage Terminal we see 1.4 Watts - Where is the missing power gone? 0.68 has been accounted for!

[PIH123]

I thought you of all would not just to conclusions and assumptions - Don't be the Judge here P, maybe instead, try to answer the very simple question I asked!

How is it, that from the 0 Voltage Terminal, to the Output, we see 3.3 Watts, but from the 0 Voltage Terminal to the + Voltage Terminal we see 1.4 Watts - Where is the missing power gone? 0.68 has been accounted for!

In order for me to proceed to answer, I need a little input 1st.

1. What is the exact circuit under test ?
2. What are the component manufacturers and part numbers used ?
3. Where you sourced them would be useful but not required.
4. What equipment did you use to test ?
5. What settings on that equipment ?
6. Where was that equipment connected to the circuit.


Without AT LEAST that info, I would be wasting my time replicating.

There are others who are in progress with less than a month in this. (unfortunately, due to lack of up front info, most are guessing).
You had 16 years.
Why not just spill the beans.
Your 9 out of 10 failures must have told you what not to do, and assuming you documented those failures,
just dig out that info and divulge.