Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

Started by EMJunkie, January 16, 2015, 12:08:38 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 101 Guests are viewing this topic.

synchro1

Quote from: MarkE on February 06, 2015, 07:10:43 PM
It's not my silly statement.  It is more gobbledegook you have posted without any context.   

Given a pair of transformer windings there are only four terminals and a limited number of ways to connect those terminals:  Series: voltages add, parallel (windings must be matched) currents add, or bucking voltages subtract.  There is no magic and no free energy in any of the configurations.  Each configuration has been used for decades and decades.

@MarkE,

How do you account for Woopyjump's "Sergdo Transformer" COP? He generates a solid 35 watts of lumens with merely .6 watts of input. I've never seen anything this impressive before. Everyone knows Woopyjump's credibility is above reproach. Seriously now! What in the hell is going on? Why is it that everyone continues to ignore this "warp factor" accomplishment?

TinselKoala

Quote from: Grumage on February 06, 2015, 04:32:31 PM
Dear TinselKoala.

Over the last 2 pages of this thread in your replies to Void, you have linked Stivep ( Wesley ) with both Akula and Ruslan as working together.

Are you aware that Stivep lives in the United States ?
This does not mean that they are not "working together", of course.
Quote

Stivep ( Wesley ) has just taken some of his valuable time to interpret the language spoken in the many videos to help others who may wish to replicate these devices and provide a possible explanation of how they work.   
Just as I said: He is the English-language speaking community's promotor of Akula and Ruslan. And don't you mean "how they don't work"? Because no matter how much Stivep tries to "explain", nobody has been able to replicate anything.... except of course ME, replicating the exact scope traces using the circuit with the mistakes that I found and corrected. But nobody has made a self-runner using information from any of those persons, have they? Of course they have not. Yet I have presented "possible" and even very plausible explanations, along with actual demonstrations, of how they "work". Nobody has refuted my explanations! And anyone who tries the methods I suggest _will_ be able to "replicate" the performances of Akula and Ruslan!
Quote
Wesley has been steadily working for the last 18 months or so on the Coleman device, not as you are suggesting in collusion with either Akula or Ruslan.
So the translations and schematics and so forth are taking away from his valuable time working on the Coleman device? How nice and generous of Stivep. Sorry to be sarcastic, but wild goose chases happen all over the world and people waste their time doing all kinds of things. So we are so very stupid, since we cannot even reproduce a simple self-running device that has maybe 20 dollars worth of commercial off-the-shelf components in it... plus of course some radioactive doped Russian ferrite material or something else conveniently unobtainable. Right?
Quote
I am attaching a link to Akula's latest video. No OU, but a very interesting transformer. The lamps are rated at 36 V 60 W incandescent. And those weird looking tubes to the right and left are Russian HV capacitors.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pYjREkw1v-A

Cheers Grum

Key words: No OU, Russian HV capacitors. "Very interesting" is Russian for "perfectly ordinary" ?   I guess I'll have to wait for Stivep's translation.

Thanks for your comments!

tinman

Quote from: synchro1 on February 06, 2015, 07:59:07 PM
How do you account for Woopyjump's "Sergdo Transformer" COP? He generates a solid 35 watts of lumens with merely .6 watts of input. I've never seen anything this impressive before. Everyone knows Woopyjump's credibility is above reproach. Seriously now! What in the hell is going on?
The eye's dont see all.
LED's can be made to look very bright,and yet the actual lumens output can be very low. Set up a light box using a solar cell. Place a cap across the solar cell, and a resistor across that cap,then take some voltage readings from the LED using the circuit,and the LED running on it's normal power supply-->you may get an unexpected supprise.

Things arnt always what they seem to be.

MarkE

Quote from: EMJunkie on February 06, 2015, 07:18:37 PM
@MarkE - If one thinks about it, it is not "gobbledegook"! Its a very valid statement, its valid in any inductor in any Transformer.
You offered a statement completely out of context.  This is more of your carnival barker routine.

Speaking of which, you never did point out a single thing wrong with the drawing that you claimed was so terribly wrong.  Care to try again?

EMJunkie

Quote from: EMJunkie on February 06, 2015, 06:57:34 PM
@ALL

Let me ask you, in the statement:

"If the directions of the two signals are such that opposite H-fields cancel and E-fields add, an apparently steady E-field will be created. The energy density of the fields remain as calculated above, but the value of the E-field will double from E/2 to E. It is a simple matter using the equations E/H= √με and c=  1/√με for a team wave to get rid of H and c and so convert the first equation into the well known equation for energy density in the so-called electrostatic field"

What is E/2

I will think of a Prize for the Winner  ;) Must be the best answer, not the first!

What is E/2

@ALL

Any Takers?

MarkE is out by the sounds of it.

  Chris

P.S: Entries must have a PayPal Account and PM Me their E-Mail Address for the Prize.