Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Overunity motor, part3, all 4 recharging bats reading at 1.400 volts now.

Started by stevensrd1, March 17, 2015, 08:44:46 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

MarkE

Quote from: MileHigh on March 21, 2015, 10:01:46 AM
There is a disconnect with Sm0ky2 where he doesn't understand that the method of excitation for the coil in a Joule Thief is not even related to a method for finding the self-resonant frequency for a coil.  He is also blindly believing the generic catch-all phrase that "resonance make the circuit more efficient" and applying it to a Joule Thief.

Sm0ky2:  With a few months of diligent study you will be in a better position to appreciate this.
It's a pretty much a put up or shut up situation for him.  Anyone can make claims.  Providing evidence for those claims, that can be another matter.

MarkE

Quote from: tinman on March 21, 2015, 11:44:12 AM
So i threw together a quick cool joule circuit,just so as i could have a look at it with my digital scope.Below is the slightly modified circuit(D1 removed),and a scope shot. The blue trace is across emitter/base,and the yellow trace is across emitter/collector. I am useing two identical solenoid coils from an old washing machines water valves-->both have the steel core removed,so as they are air core now. I have changed the transistor to a TIP35C. Looking at the scope,it seems that the transistor is switching on with only 480mV ???
The LED / B1 branch just load the oscillator down.  I've got my measurements and simulation in pretty close agreement now using the parts I listed.  The base current is pretty much a sawtooth.  It takes a big jump on the falling side of the collector voltage waveform and then ramps towards zero, where the collector voltage pulses upward and then collapses as L2 discharges.

If you are using your scope probes in X1 mode, you should change that to X10 mode.  It will reduce the loading effects of your probes.

tinman

Quote from: MarkE on March 21, 2015, 09:38:55 AM

  This tells us that Tinman was right that Miller capacitance is the energy source.  The Miller capacitance reacts with the large inductance in series with the base to drive these oscillations. 

The last scope shot is the collector and base waveforms with the LEDs open.
I am learning--> i have great teachers.
TK & MarkE
Thanks for taking the time to check it out.

tinman

Quote from: MarkE on March 21, 2015, 11:52:45 AM
The LED / B1 branch just load the oscillator down.  I've got my measurements and simulation in pretty close agreement now using the parts I listed.  The base current is pretty much a sawtooth.  It takes a big jump on the falling side of the collector voltage waveform and then ramps towards zero, where the collector voltage pulses upward and then collapses as L2 discharges.

If you are using your scope probes in X1 mode, you should change that to X10 mode.  It will reduce the loading effects of your probes.
I have switched the probes to 10x,and i dont see much difference in the wave forms,but the voltage across the circuit has risen some. I set the voltage on each channel to 100mV/PD,and dropped both channels down one devision so as to fit the whole wave form in the frame.

minnie




  To the likes of Floor and sm0key,
                MarkE , TK, MH  etc. are trying to educate, read and learn before making
   comments, everything they say can be verified. If any of them err and you point
   out they'll retract or amend as necessary, we should all be on the same side!
               John.