MY 'LEVITATING OBJECT' INVENTION

[TinselKoala]

I red and saw a video from a russian clever inventor,shows a way to link to magnets without contact...interesting indeed.

(+++)(-)   (+-)   

You could use that to achieve a way to tracht(traction) two bodies linked witout contact...i don't remember the name of the linkage---

Sigh.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nUihboGkJnE

Can be done with flat magnets too, as detailed in Nikolayev's Russian book.

[TinselKoala]

Below, are 3 diagrams showing  3  different methods for this  toy levitation idea  .

(  NOTE : This is not the  'Invention'  for which this thread was created,  check the original posts  )

(  I cannot build anything ,  and I don't have any diamagnetic materials ,  etc,  etc  )

I can build things, and have built things, and I can tell you _once again_ that your idea does not and will not work. But don't take my word for it... figure out some way to get around your "can't build anything" meme and do some experimentation of your own, if you don't believe those who can and do build things.

You need a point of rigid contact like the Mendocino system, or spin-stabilization like the original Levitron, or active feedback-controlled electromagnetic stabilization like this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xkiGTWODERo

or superconductivity and flux pinning, like this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JRby1Wilv-Q

[guest1289]

Not only do I believe you when you say my inventions won't work,  but I can see much more obvious proof supporting what you say.

My  inventions  are so  incredibly   simple  and  obvious,  that they would have been invented over a hundred years ago,  and if they  worked,  I would already have seen  working examples.

(  I know you did read that the little    floating-objects   in this    toy-invention,  would have weights extending down from their bottom,  to prevent them from   flipping   ,    to  give   stabilize  them,   a combo  of  gravity  and  magnetic-levitation  )

(  my only experimenting is with little  flat-disc shaped magnets,   the shape of watch batteries,   I cannot do more than that   )

As you can see,   whatever you type,  can't quite stop my slight doubt and curiosity,     but at the same time I know everyone here with   your experience    knows my  inventions  cannot  work

[SoManyWires]

Not only do I believe you when you say my inventions won't work,  but I can see much more obvious proof supporting what you say.

My  inventions  are so  incredibly   simple  and  obvious,  that they would have been invented over a hundred years ago,  and if they  worked,  I would already have seen  working examples.

(  I know you did read that the little    floating-objects   in this    toy-invention,  would have weights extending down from their bottom,  to prevent them from   flipping   ,    to  give   stabilize  them,   a combo  of  gravity  and  magnetic-levitation  )

(  my only experimenting is with little  flat-disc shaped magnets,   the shape of watch batteries,   I cannot do more than that   )

As you can see,   whatever you type,  can't quite stop my slight doubt and curiosity,     but at the same time I know everyone here with   your experience    knows my  inventions  cannot  work

it is sometimes good to be stubborn.
you may or may not be onto something, after you do some tests of things on your own, the value in hands on education will prove itself at least useful.
it is wise to allow considerations of others as constructive criticism, those with a strong working knowledge about how things that do work, do work.
it can seem non constructive, though maybe their insights are worth considering too should any of it be helpful with your being able to succeed, or even to prove their usually valid points.

have a idea of a design myself, still going to work on developing it until which time i hit too solid of a wall, or break through it.

safely though.

[guest1289]

Here's some incredibly simple  levitation-methods (  Diagram  Below ),  I can't see why something based on these types of principles would not work

    A big enough  repelling-surface  on the bottom of the  floating-object  would  overcome/ignore  the individual  merge-points  on  the  ground-repelling-surface