Looks Like OU Senior Member Avalon Has DONE IT! New Video!

[picowatt]

I seen it the firt time,and your point is what?
Is there reference to satellites orbiting above 1000 mile's from earth-in the van allen belts them self?

I thought you were discussing Apollo, in particular that
radiation exposure made manned moon missions impossible,
which the provided link discusses.

Also, from that link, "Quote mining is the deceitful tactic of taking quotes
out of context in order to make them seemingly agree with the quote miner's viewpoint",
which is also relevant to the link you posted.

I did, however, get a chuckle from the "Bozos suspended from wires" comment
in the video link you provided, apparently the ISS is not real or manned either.

Do you have an answer as to why there are no wheel tracks from the lunar rovers in the pics i posted above ?-->from TK's third party proof link.

Yes

Can you explain as to why these other pictures below from various apollo missions also show lunar rovers that leave no tracks?. All from NASA's own web site if you wish to go look-->just in case you think the pictures have been modified.

Yes

NASA's own web site has these pictures and video's that show hoax through and through.
But start with explaining as to why there are no wheel tracks from the rover's. If you can do that,then we will open a thread here,and post the rest of the evidence that i believe show's the moon landings were fake.

Brad

Regarding the tracks, consider the images in which one does see tracks
and what those tracks look like (depth, etc).  Also consider the physical
qualities of the lunar soil, the lunar vacuum, low gravity, and then watch
video of a rover in motion.

However, don't bother making a new thread.  It is obvious that many are
emotionally invested in their "beliefs" and like religion, I rarely waste my time
with what often ends up in fruitless non-ending heated debates, and I can
tell right off that this would be one of them.

I merely wanted to post the link discussing Apollo radiation exposure.
As Ripley would say, "believe it or not"...   

PW

[FatBird]

Click on this Link to watch a FREE Video that ABSOLUTELY PROVES they never went to the moon.
If you buy this video privately, it costs around $50.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C4h2czZTTLM
                                                                                                                                     .

[tinman]

I thought you were discussing Apollo, in particular that
radiation exposure made manned moon missions impossible,
which the provided link discusses.

Also, from that link, "Quote mining is the deceitful tactic of taking quotes
out of context in order to make them seemingly agree with the quote miner's viewpoint",
which is also relevant to the link you posted.



Yes

Yes





I merely wanted to post the link discussing Apollo radiation exposure.
As Ripley would say, "believe it or not"...   

PW

I did, however, get a chuckle from the "Bozos suspended from wires" comment
in the video link you provided, apparently the ISS is not real or manned either.

There are many video's in the NASA archives that clearly show the astronauts being suspended on wire's. And some of there moves would put Michael Jackson to shame.

The ISS i do firmly believe in,as i have seen it with my own eyes through my tracking scope--no argument from me on that one. However/lol--i believe some of the video's that are suppose to be shot on the ISS ,leave a bit to be desired.

Regarding the tracks, consider the images in which one does see tracks
and what those tracks look like (depth, etc).  Also consider the physical
qualities of the lunar soil, the lunar vacuum, low gravity, and then watch
video of a rover in motion.

Well the tracks are a no brainer,and we only have to look at the astronauts foot print's, the depth of those foot prints,and the weight of the astronauts on the moon to know that the luner rovers should leave a very decent track. I mean,the pictures posted by the moon walker believers from the  lunar orbitor of shots of what is suppose to be the left over equipment,clearly show the tracks from the lunar rover's. So one would think that if you can see them from space,you should be able to see them from 5 feet away

However, don't bother making a new thread.  It is obvious that many are
emotionally invested in their "beliefs" and like religion, I rarely waste my time
with what often ends up in fruitless non-ending heated debates, and I can
tell right off that this would be one of them.

Indeed.


Brad

[picowatt]

Well the tracks are a no brainer,and we only have to look at the astronauts foot print's, the depth of those foot prints,and the weight of the astronauts on the moon to know that the luner rovers should leave a very decent track.

No, it actually does require a "brainer".  The action of the rover
wheels is significantly different than astronaut footprints.  Watch
some videos of rovers in motion.  The first close up image you posted
of no rover tracks actually provides clues to the answer. 

As I said, I only wanted to provide the link regarding the VAB radiation, which
many use as proof man did not go to the moon.  To me that argument is a non-starter.

Again, in the end, we will all believe what we want...

PW

[tinman]

No, it actually does require a "brainer".  The action of the rover
wheels is significantly different than astronaut footprints.  Watch
some videos of rovers in motion.  The first close up image you posted
of no rover tracks actually provides clues to the answer. 

As I said, I only wanted to provide the link regarding the VAB radiation, which
many use as proof man did not go to the moon.  To me that argument is a non-starter.

Again, in the end, we will all believe what we want...

PW

When the rovers are slowing to a stop,then the tracks would be well made and even,and easy to see. In regards to the rovers motion on the moon-->it is wrong,and easily proven here on earth.
I work every day fitting off road suspension to off road and 4x4 vehicles,and i know how suspension and vehicle reactions take place in regards to weight.

When you watch the lunar rovers moving on the moon,why is it in slow motion?. As the vehicle would weigh more here on earth than on the moon,then when the wheels hit a bump here on earth,the upward thrust the suspension would place on the vehicle would cause a slower upward reaction,where as on the moon,where the vehicle weighs 1/6th than it would here on earth,the vehicle should have a much quicker upward reaction. But we see this slow motion crap,and that is just wrong. When the lunar rover hit a bug bump or hole,the vehicle should rise up/bounce up quickly,and fall back down slower than it would here on earth-->but as i said,we see the opposite,where it all looks like it's in slow motion.
More weight=rise slower,fall faster---less weight=rise faster,fall slower.
It really is funny to watch the rovers in slow motion,that dose not represent reality at all.

So as far as the pictures are concerned,we should see rover tracks very clearly in all those picture's--like the one below.