Self Sustaining Electricity Generator

[core]

All punches are welcome here.. All ideas are welcome..Nothing excluded..No problems..You set the rule for determining the OU..How it is to be proved...As far as I'm concerned I think it should be Ok if I use a computer UPS to power about 8000 watts for more than the time the UPS can power them. UPS is 1.1 kilowatt UPS. If I produce from the input of the UPS more than 1100 watts which is not possible for the UPS to be performed you need to agree. Is it fair?  Video yes,..No problems..I do not want to show the construction etc Videos but we will assemble the device and then show the Device powering all 40x200 watts lamps..I think it should satisfy you or any one else. We will check what is the input watts and what is the output watts.

The most important rule is that we just enjoy what we are doing, have fun, and understand that we all may walk a different path but all path's lead to the same place. How about that.

Please let me know how many here have built Magnetic core devices where the core weighs 150 kgms..All seem to play with Electronics..Not Electromagnetics..which is what I have done.

Never in my life, that is impressive, I will not scratch something like that off my list to build. I do have some heavy iron in my garage.

My Problem is that this is not a regular work for me and we do the experiments once in a month or fortnight. Any one can test the device and let us know what is the result..what is the problem...

I think that's that same for all of us. I work a minimum 60 hours a week. Tough to build and experiment when your exhausted. Not to mention there is always something around the house that needs attention first.

The purpose of our providing the information open source is to make others benefit..Only when it is done this work would become useful..I would suggest that let others build the device as indicated and then come back and bomb me after that if they are not able to replicate.

I believe the work is vast, there has been many individuals that have achieved success the last 100 years. So I am a firm believer that there is more then one way to skin a cat (American saying) Those that can build need to get involved, those that can think outside the box also need to get involved.


- Core

[core]

2. Does the like poles repel give more induced coil output as the youtube
    demo said it would? I want to do this myself to make sure it was not
    an error in the testing.
  see this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yvVbDQ-z66o&feature=youtu.be
attracting vs repeling magnets with coil between...
N S max 1.48 volts  S S 8.99.x volts  6 times better

If these are all valid then I'm ready to build.....

Norman

Norman, give it a shot, we have nothing to lose and everything to gain. I am looking forward you seeing the progress of your build! As always, all builds welcome here. please keep us updated on the status.

-Core

[core]

In one Free to Energy Base document I read, opposing poles is what was mentioned to give Real Output in all the named Overunity devices. So Ramaswami claim is True.

If I recall correctly it was Hanon who made the claim first. Also I recall NRam trying nut not getting any good results. But it looks like Norman will be giving it a shot.

- Core

[core]

Earlier Dieter and others including Hanon agreed no output between identical poles.. why he changed was not clear to me but is clear now..
I will write one long post tomorrow as to why and how I got in to this..
I think I will have to keep quiet now..sorry about that..

Regards

Ramaswami

Ok, but lets concentrate on the build, and in particular, outside the box thinking, that will allow us to achieve a common goal. You have written a lot as to why you got into this on the other thread. Why not just provide a link for the new members to your other posts.

Let's not be so quick to celebrate ourselves.

- Core

[NRamaswami]

Core:

I have never disclosed how I got in to this..here..

All my posts on the Generator are posted only in the Figuera thread http://overunity.com/12794/re-inventing-the-wheel-part1-clemente_figuera-the-infinite-energy-machine/#.VsgjcPl97IU

The device is like a lot of large and small electromagnets or solenoids placed one after the other. The large solenoids act as a step down transformer where the secondary coil is wound along with the primary coil and turns of secondary coil have distances between each other. Primary coil is a multifilar coil. Primary coil can also be a single small high resistance wire if you can put a lot of lamps high resistance low current drawing lamps before the current comes to activate the primary coils.

a. The primary coils can be connected in series, so that the current always flows in the same direction and moves always in the same direction.

b. The primary coils can be  connected in parallel so that the current always flows in the same direction and moves always in the same direction.

c. The Primary coil can also be connected in series so that the current moves away from the center and then moves towards the central secondary coil.

d. The primary coil can again be connected in parallel so that the current moves away from the center and then moves towards the central secondary coil.

The best mode comes when d is used. COP>1 can be achieved when C or d are used.

The most important thing is that we must control the current. Lower the amperage Higher the voltage better is the result. 

I have used multifilar coils 12 filar coils to be precise to reduce the amperage drawn from 220 volts to power two primary coils connected in parallel. amperage drawn was only 0.15 amps. Very mild magnetism in the two primaries each weighing 60 kgms. The secondary core weighs about 30 kgms. The secondary core is able to light lamps 10x200 watts lamps on its own but at 28.3 volts. When we connect the secondaries wound under the two primaries the voltage increased to about 49.3 volts if I remember correctly. Amperage in secondary was 1.05 amps. Secondary alone provided about 28 watts I remember. If you have four such primaries and three such secondaries you are bound to have cop>1 automatically.

Amperage is based on what is the weight of magnetized iron core we are using. Voltage depends on how many turns and what is the magnetic field strength of the secondary.

Beyond that there is nothing. You have indicated that you have never ever used large iron cores. The secret if there is any is in creating the bonus secondary coils that this design provides and the amount of magnetized iron core and using thick secondary coils. It appears that sparks contain high voltage and high frequency and low amperage. So I would expect that if the output from a Tesla coil is to hit the primary input point and the primary output points go to earth a lot of current can be produced. Wild guess at that. Nothing more.

Unfortunately none of the friends who communicated with me would respond to my emails. I would kind of retire from this field.

Regarding the 1908 Figuera Patent I'm unable to understand it. We are not willing to use a battery to provide the power source as battery can provide a lot of amperage. We have seen wires once connected to battery refuse to come out and kind of melt..Also I would think that any electromagnet taking power from a battery would become a permanent magnet immediately. So I'm unable to understand much on the Figuera device of 1908. Unfortunately I do not know theory nor am I trained and so I can only do the experiments and see the observations.

We are always able to light lamps when a lot of iron is used in the secondary core. Not knowing any thing I might have done some thing..

I have nothing more to write..Thank you all.

Regards,

Ramaswami