Common batteries are free energy sources

[ResinRat2]

ARRRGGGGGGHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Here we go again! Another crook!!!!! 

This kind of stuff is really making me lose faith in humanity.

Thanks for the info 

[pg46]

Hi -

I did the same 3 small rechargeable battery setup as Joe. I fully charged 2 batteries and the 3rd battery was dead(decharged)
First try I used a 8w 12volt bulb but it drew only 100ma. Thought I'd better draw more current than that because it would run a mighty long time before drawing down. After many many hours I did get the dead battery charges up to 1.25 volts but under a load it faded quickly. So am now drawing 400 ma. Didn't know how long to go before switching. Decided to try switching when the amp guage went down to 200ma which takes about 30 minutes or more to get it down there in my setup.
Did the battery switch in every position and did end up with a fully charged #3 battery  which seemed to compare well to the original fully charged batteries under the same load.
Thats encouraging I think, except that now one of the other batteries is now the new dead one and so around you go again. Thats what I am doing now to see how I end up after the second go around.
Will keep you posted.
PS. Just guessing but its probably OK to use the bigger 12 volt batteries so long as one doesn't draw too much current.

Best,

[joe]

Hello Guys,

Yes I agree, this is a serious free Energy site so we don't need those kind of people here.

About my setup,  i will take some photos of it this week end and post it.
Resinrat,  about your first question i can't anwser it right now cause i am only testing with small rechargeble batteries and as far as i see it does work. But I can't conclude for real that those batteries will stay charged for a long period of time. Only time will tell us.
I am going to test it for weeks and then i will be able to say that it is working or not.
Second question, no i don't use diodes cause batteries have too low voltage (1.20 v.) When we use diodes we are loosing about 0.6 volts so the batteries would died in minutes.
Next question, i waited for the voltage to drop from 1.20 Volts to .90 volts V.  so with the kind of bulb i am using it takes about 1/2 hour to reach th .90 V.

So, so far so good and the next experiment would be with 12 volts car batteries. I will have to get for the test  3 or 4   12 volts batteries with the same amperage. This way i will be able to meusure the voltage up and down with precision.

But to tell you frankly, it is a bit scarry cause you never know what could happen with high amperage. Especially reverse connections like that  
Anyway, i will keep inform of my results this week end.

Regards  Joe 

[PaulLowrance]

Hello Folks,

please note the scam-alert in the category : Money makes the world go round ,
section :

investment scams, warning about fraudulent offers

Info about Tesa_2006.

His MEG-Version he offeres does not exist. Do not send money for nothing !

So do not waste time on the subjects he brings up here.

Kator

Excuse me Kator, but working on the MEG is by no means a waste of time!!!  In fact, the MEG probably has the best chance of generating "free energy" than any machine to date.

Your statements should be a little clearer.  Last month you were trying to tell us the MEG generates deadly ultrasonic waves, which is completely incorrect and disinformation.

Paul Lowrance

[Kator01]

Hello PaulL,

I didnt state that the MEG emits deadly sonic waves. I simply gave an indication that these waves must occur especially if you run it like J.Naudin by switching the magnet with bucking fields.
Whether you accept the negative effects of supersonic-waves on tissue or not is not of importance here. A shielding of these Waves is another step to do in this development, later.

It is up to anyone to develop anything he likes in this area. I only stated this warning because these waves are not easy to detect.( You remember Madame Curie ? She was unconscious of the radiation and died because of this - I know this is a bad comparison example ) No one ever thinks about the supersonic-screening of pregnant-women and the effect it has to the little organism.
I simply care about safety.

It is almost interesting: everytime I give this indication about this superrsonic-waves created by Lorentz-Forces and even when I give you valuable references of serious scientific-institues who have the knowledge about this I either face total silence or a reluctant attitude.
Did you ever read what I had given as an reference ? ( EMUS-Converter, german-development )
Supersonic waves, if created in this device, combine with the electromagnetic flux-variation. It is an additive factor especially because they also create heat in the core, not eddy-currents ( nano-core hardly has eddy-currents)

I am really curious why you are so reluctant to my statements.
I will not touch this subject anymore because it is clear to me, scientiically as well as technically.
PaulL, let everyone here in this community decide for himself whether it is worth to continue with the MEG or not.
I simply give my input here, criticism involved and necessary or progess.

Now your second remark : Waste of time ? I really wonder if my english is so bad that you get it all wrong. This guy steals time and energy and money as well from people here and maybe in other similar communities. Any person who does this is not worth to be taken serious any longer, his posts included.
Waste of time relates to reading and experimenting on things he posts here.
It costed me nearly one day til I found the truth about this person because of a member here who I watched my reaction to Tesala_2006-posts.I watched this MEG-stuff since years now and wish you the best for your new approach on this.


Kator