100W Wireless and Single-Wire Power Transmission

[spg]

Hi everyone,

I just added some new details on my  blog, especially as regards the reasons why  variant 3CT(Three-Coil   power Transfer) is so effective.

Basic Tesla's Experiments (Part 1) – 100W Wireless Transmission without Ground Connection – SpigelLab

[spg]

Hi everyone,

I just added some new details on my blog, especially as regards the reasons why  variant 3CT(Three-Coilpower Transfer) is so effective.

http://www.spigellab.com/2016/05/27/basic-teslas-experiments-part-1-100w-wireless-transmission-without-ground-connection/

[the_big_m_in_ok]

Hi,
in this experiment, I was surprised how strong is electrical field around the Tesla coil.
It is also interesting how much power can be transferred using capacitive coupling without resonance.
This experiment somewhat reminiscent of Tesla's radiant energy collector.

Basic Tesla's Experiments (Part 2) - Capacitive Coupling Wireless Power Transmission:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dc6Cw4GomMY

Your device, pictured, looks like it works similarly to this:


http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-C30zrTQ258g/VVaQaE1sb4I/AAAAAAAAADI/NCT3bKcNajQ/s1600/Don-Smith-Device-2006.jpg


       Seems to be the same type of functioning.   BTW, any number of outlying receiving units can be placed around the core transmitting unit.   The output power can be amazingly great compared to the input power.


--Lee

[spg]

Hi, Lee

Thank you for the excellent suggestion.
Yes, I was surprised by the fact. A very interesting result.

I have made the following test:

First I took a single aluminum plate and single bulb. Power consumption was 40.3W.

Then I made a test with two aluminum plates and two bulbs.

With the same power consumption lamps are obviously stronger glow. But it depends on the distance between the plates.
When is too big or too small distance between the plates and coils, the result is not so good.
I think it's a very good start to build overunity devices.

However, several elements must be clarified:

If near the coil L1 is not another coil or aluminum plate, the device consumes significantly more power (over 150W). It is possible that most of the power is consumed by the radio wave radiation.

When the coil L1 closer to the coil L2 or aluminum plate, the power consumption of the device is significantly reduced.
Probably coming back a portion of power. It is also possible that due to the proximity of other coils or aluminum plate comes to disturbance of radio radiation and to thereby reduce power consumption.
I think that these effects had to be well studied, particularly as they may affect up to those previously described test.

Don Smith device is very interesting and in the example shown, apparently used capacitive coupling - a similarity with my device.

Thanks,
Spigel

[the_big_m_in_ok]

Hi, Lee

Thank you for the excellent suggestion.
Yes, I was surprised by the fact. A very interesting result.

(snip...)

Hey Spigel,
Try this as an example of OU ideas as a large presentation from the 'Web...

https://www.google.com/search?q=gbluer+exciter&rlz=1C1ASUM_enUS603US603&espv=2&biw=1247&bih=983&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=6DGOVOynM8S5ogTMw4HYCw&ved=0CAYQ_AUoAQ&dpr=0.9

The gbluer exciter is something I favor very much as having potentially big gains in power output.

--Lee