free energy = AC electricity can be multiplied with pulleys

[Berto3]

Please ZL, no voting, no filters, no bureaucracy. People with some technical background can decide for themselves if they read or skip a message. I had to laugh with the posting of "that_prophet". Your post about disinformation is great, but don't underestimate the visitors at this forum. We are not believers in the way religious people do or adherents of an ideology. The only similarity is that we believe in miracles.

[ZL]

Berto3,
I am glad you liked the information about the disinfo methods.

My suggestion would not change the present functioning of the forum, you and other members will still have to decide on your own what to read and what to ignore, just like now. My suggestion would only add two extra categories to the forum and few extra threads, which don't exist at the moment. The purpose of these extra categories is to offer assistance to those who wish to use them. Nobody would be forced to read these two extra categories, and nobody would be forced to participate in creating and maintaining those lists and filters. It is all purely voluntary.

I am not a beginner in FE research and I can also recognize most of the hoaxes without investing much time, effort, and money. However, I would be very thankful if some altruistic people with lots of free time and patience would be kind enough to read through those 17000 threads, and pre-mine useful information for me.

I have got no time to read this huge amount of text. So I have got no idea what good info nuggets might be hidden at the bottom of this heap of threads. There is no chance for me to ever find them if somebody doesn't post into those threads to make them appear on the front page, and make me curious enough to check them out. Even if this would happen, and I would visit the front page while it is listed, and would check it out, the thread might be so long in itself that I would not be able to read all the posts in it, and might miss something very useful and important, hiding within that thread. Therefore a mining of useful threads, information, and inventions can be only beneficial, and help people. This does not involve bureaucracy, because no threads and no posts will get deleted. Only extra information offered for those interested.

Bureaucracy is not involved when mining threads that are deemed to discuss genuine FE generators or principles. Every volunteer can collect and offer his own selection and simply post his list in a specified thread. The vote can be organized by Stefan or a moderator entrusted by Stefan at an independent online voting platform. This is not bureaucracy, but simply the right of a site owner, and a source of possibly useful information. Again you don't have to read the results of such polls, you may ignore it if you wish so. The evaluation of inventions based on objective merits does not require bureaucracy either. It is put together based on facts supported by proofs. If necessary, again everybody can have his own version of this offered, besides perhaps the one generated by general consensus and offered by the site owner. The same arguments are valid for creating the list of obvious hoaxes as well. Therefore I don't see any reason why would this hinder your activities and research (unless you wish to support the disinfo campaign).

People with some technical background can decide for themselves if they read or skip a message...  but don't underestimate the visitors at this forum. We are not believers in the way religious people do or adherents of an ideology. The only similarity is that we believe in miracles.

It is a mistake to generalize, and assume that if you can easily recognize hoaxes, then all the other researchers with good intent must be able to do the same. I am convinced that the majority of the researchers who read this forum (not only members who post) can not recognize the hoaxes. There is countless proof of this on this very forum. Just take a look at the great interest in pursuing hoaxes like Keshe, Kapanadze, Milkovic, MEG, etc. Apparently many genuine researchers with honest intent and good heart are not able to recognize hoaxes, especially when they are not as trivial as the one of Chas Campbell.

Therefore I still maintain that such added feature and effort would be very useful to many, myself included, and it would not hinder genuine researchers who would still not want to use it.

[that_prophet]

I was thinking that this is so simplistic, that I was hoping that all of the evil spirits in this vast universe, could not find a way to poke holes in it. But I guess that those enemy forces still have a key word, torque, that strikes doubt in our unbelieving souls. How can I put this any clearer, these AC generators are just being used to wind up massive voltage. All of these many AC generators together, doing their massive rotating, only need to generate one single spark of current, (practically none). That is because the input for your DC drive motor, connected to the large 1000cm circumference pulley, only needs to be a single spark of current. That is because you only need to rotate this large pulley once, and it will give you a return of 1000cm of moving belt.
-
Then, when you run this 1000cm of moving belt through one to ten mini-pulleys, having only one centimetre circumference, this will translate into 1000 to 10 000 cycles of AC electricity. There is no more discussion needed, with only one spark of DC input, you are using the mechanical abilities of pulleys, to gain a return of 1000 to 10 000 units, (sparks) of AC electricity. This shows a clear multiplication of electricity, which means that you do not have to pay for it to be generated by fossil fuels, or the heat off nuclear fission. In essence, you are using this technology to multiply already generated electricity, there by gaining free energy.

[citfta]

How many useless threads about the exact same thing does this guy have to start before someone bans him?

[thx1138]

In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is.