Confirmation of OU devices and claims

[SeaMonkey]

Again, it really doesn't matter what is shown, demonstrated, etc.,
because you guys all have an agenda here to silence and disprove OU.

It is far easier for someone to be deceived than it is for that someone to
admit they've been deceived.  Those who are deceived often develop a
very strong emotional attachment to their erroneous beliefs and will
tenaciously cling to them even in the face of Truth.

Deceptions should be temporary and not permanent.

The only AGENDA at work here should be that of the Scientific Method
as it was intended to be implemented.  Finding TRUTH.

[ramset]

https://opensource.org/osd-annotated


Rick
I bring you flowers and you bring me venom
I asked if you would allow a demonstration of your technology at your customers lab
I heard there were motors there ,
   When you made the comment a few pages back that those were your motors
I figured you would allow a demonstration there .
And for clarity we weren't even talking about demonstrating those motors we were talking about your other claim ....the simple motor Modification in you're 37 minute video?




  I called the lab ..I find out about the motors, that you have them now or sold them ...? I asked about the motors and how they worked and what they did , would seem the 1 1/2 months was all  they were ever used for and it was felt The batteries were quite a nuisance .
So The machines were sitting there collecting dust .
No idea what all that other stuff you wrote is about ??


I posted hear what I was told  I did ask permission first before I posted here
I did not add about the 45 W solar panel that was also on the job site
But I posted what I was told ...2000Watt output for 1 1/2 months The machine and batteries are on the job all day and the machine charge the batteries at night
And yes the man was happy to get the power on and just use electricity to run the job and be done with back-and-forth machine transportation every day
I thought you would be very happy with this ...the only problem is it was hearsay


I felt an actual demonstration would be a wonderful thing to see ? All information would have been shared ..(  Open sourced )And anyone could replicate what was demonstrated.


For the life of me I am clueless as to why you're calling me a liar and an Antagonist or whatever you're calling me ?


I believe the man at the lab and that is why I suggested more investigation of this ?



And please read the definition of open source above !

[tinman]

Ramset confirmed it


No,you were wrong.
Ramset confirmed it
[/font][/size]
I had nothing to do with anyone being moderated.  Another Tinman wrong assumption.
That is because in my book when you have no input you do not need to measure. 


Rubbish.


WAS I?
Let's examine Itsu's results:-



" Post by Itsu on OUR :  concerning the charging of a battery using the HV of the big coil, it went nowhere, so i removed the 3 satellite coils surrounding the big coil.

Now some more HV is available to charge the battery as the charge current went up from 2.2mA to now 6.53mA.
The voltage went up in a few hours from 12.83V to now 12.87V.

Hopefully this extra power is enough to start "conditioning" the battery.

By the way, the input to the big coil / gate driver is now 12.59V @ 12mA (was 7mA with the 3 satellite coils).

Itsu
Running overnight, the charge battery is now at 12.92V (@ 6.48mA) and the primary battery at 12.56V (@ 12mA).

Itsu "

So let me see:  In put battery went from 12.59 volts to  12.56 volts a loss of -0.03 volts.

The charging battery went up from 12.83 volts to 12.92 volts a gain of               + 0.09 volts

You also detected that the battery did not increase in temperature.  That means it was charged by cold electricity as a battery should increase it's heat signature when charged.

So we have an overall gain of +.06 volts.

These are your figures according to your highly scientific test.

Obviously the batteries need rotating for at least a month to ensure the results are accurate..  But it's a good start....



You are looking stupid Brad....

The only one looking stupid here a.king is you,as you seem to think that V across a battery is some sort of indication of a batteries state of charge.

You also think that because the batteries temperature did not rise-with a mere 7mA of current flowing through it,it was charge by the mythical cold electricity.

And then we have the old Friedwick time delay trick,where very large batteries must be used,and rotated for many months.

You two are clasic Bedini nuts.


Brad

[a.king21]

The only one looking stupid here a.king is you,as you seem to think that V across a battery is some sort of indication of a batteries state of charge.

You also think that because the batteries temperature did not rise-with a mere 7mA of current flowing through it,it was charge by the mythical cold electricity.

And then we have the old Friedwick time delay trick,where very large batteries must be used,and rotated for many months.

You two are clasic Bedini nuts.


Brad

I did not ask anyone to do a replication. I was merely looking for additional ideas to extract real power from reactive power. So I discovered that the RICK could be used to charge batteries.  I was not sure abut the output because as you say it is small. None the less some energy was extracted.  So far no-one has suggested any further experiments. How about using your considerable experience to assist the process of investigation and experiment rather than to condemn every experimental attempt?


At least I have shown that the resonance induction coupler kit can also be used as an experimental and safe battery charger. Itsu was really fearful of trying the experiment at first because he feared the voltage.  I told him it would  be OK so he tried it and lo and behold nothing was damaged and it worked.
I also suggested that it could be used to recharge non-rechargeable batteries,, but that experiment was not tried.


So it's obvious you are against all experiments because the great Tinman knows all the answers.


Well the good news is that you cannot stop me or anyone else from experimenting and trying out new ideas.
It is called "research", my friend.

[tinman]

I did not ask anyone to do a replication. I was merely looking for additional ideas to extract real power from reactive power. So I discovered that the RICK could be used to charge batteries.  I was not sure abut the output because as you say it is small. None the less some energy was extracted.  So far no-one has suggested any further experiments. How about using your considerable experience to assist the process of investigation and experiment rather than to condemn every experimental attempt?


At least I have shown that the resonance induction coupler kit can also be used as an experimental and safe battery charger. Itsu was really fearful of trying the experiment at first because he feared the voltage.  I told him it would  be OK so he tried it and lo and behold nothing was damaged and it worked.
I also suggested that it could be used to recharge non-rechargeable batteries,, but that experiment was not tried.


So it's obvious you are against all experiments because the great Tinman knows all the answers.


Well the good news is that you cannot stop me or anyone else from experimenting and trying out new ideas.
It is called "research", my friend.

A.king

I will try and get a video together this weekend for you.
Thats the best i can do ATM.


Brad