12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

[WilbyInebriated]

Hope is one thing Wilby, delusion is another.

Omnibus will find his waterloo soon enough when he does the experiments.

indeed. i was just saying don't hold your breath on being able to persuade omni... it is hopeless.

[Omnibus]

I can persuaded very easily but the arguments have to be persuasive. Just saying 'that can't be' or something of the sort won't cut the mustard.

[fletcher]

indeed. i was just saying don't hold your breath on being able to persuade omni... it is hopeless.

Thanks, I got the gist of it & quite agree - quite some grand delusion I think.

The onus is on him to back up his grand theories with cold hard facts that others can analyse - I won't hold my breath for that either as Mr Mag said.

Seems to be self educated [as perhaps most of us are] but obviously spent a lot of time cutting class.

[Omnibus]

This is an obvious problem in the field of OU. The most vocal participants are self-educated and have a limited understanding of how science actually works and what a quality scientific argument is. There are many bright people around but when the educated structure of thinking and scientific methodology is wanting that leads to a lot of waste. One telling example from history is Edison, who aside from being a crook has been self-educated which has resulted in total lack of personal productivity and talent which he has compensated by stealing ideas and skills from others. I'm not saying there are such crooks here but some of the active self-educated people should slow it down because incompetent activity can only be detrimental to the progress in this area of research which we, all of us, so much love.

[fletcher]

Really ! - that reads like the introduction to chapter one of your autobiography.

In this endeavour to find mechanical gravity OU most are trying to find a loop hole in known physics, or to rewrite the physics books entirely with a spectacular indisputable demonstration.

Seldom does one rewrite the theory without having the experimental evidence to back it up - that's self preservation strategy, especially if the theory skills are wanting - hard to argue with empirical evidence even if you can't explain it particularly well, your case is made & you have the slam dunk in your back pocket that the forensic physicists can pour over at your leisure.

What I find disturbing is the strategy of reinterpreting the Laws using empirical evidence that is an obvious abject failure at OU.

If that strategy gets traction then it means the field can't even agree on what constitutes OU before it can hope to solve the mechanical problem of producing it.