Kapanadze and other FE discussion

[lancaIV]

Wesley, I'm skeptical about this.

If water could explode, then during the first test atomic explosion in the ocean, the energy of all the water would turn our planet into interstellar dust.

  In your videos, people use capacitors that are too large, and they add water as a filler substance. For example, in a vacuum the discharge is not so strong due to the fact that there is nothing to evaporate and nothing to create big pressure after discharge.

To the entire community:

When you think about overunity, you need to imagine what the moment will look like when overunity is achieved.

What will happen? Why energy can't increase indefinitely? What is the reason why a chain reaction does not begin, involving an increasing amount of energy in the process?

In Your thinking model we have to differ between (nearly) un/-limited space and un/-limited time !
For example :    http://www.spacetoday.org/Questions/StarlightAge.html

' ...Themost distant objects seen from Earth are quasars, Telescopes are required to view them. They are 10-15 billion lightyears away. Their light takes 10-15 billion years to reach Earth, so their light is 10-15 billion years old. ....'

Now far to near compression and (light) years to Femto-sec and concentrated :

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiation_pressure
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shock_wave

[Sergh]

' ...Themost distant objects seen from Earth are quasars, Telescopes are required to view them. They are 10-15 billion lightyears away. Their light takes 10-15 billion years to reach Earth, so their light is 10-15 billion years old. ....'

Regarding the lifetime of light, it is strange, but a photon has a zero lifetime. 10-15 billion years is zero for light:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Zspu7ziA8Y

[lancaIV]

This opens the question for and by comparison ,remembering ' wormhole' :
https://www.britannica.com/science/wormhole

https://quantumphysicslady.org/what-is-the-difference-between-an-electron-and-a-photon/
        mass and ' anti-' mass    time and ' anti-'time ( Hasenoehrl-Einstein e= mc² /  N.Tesla e= tc² )

Photon to electron conversion
https://news.mit.edu/2013/photon-to-electron-conversion-0418
Particle

electron and anti-electron/positron

-Wave 

wave and " (pseudo)anti" !?-wave

https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-m&sca_esv=572205757&q=anti-wave+physics+&oq=anti-wave+physics+&aqs=heirloom-srp..


-Dualism

https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20180809-we-will-ever-be-able-to-freeze-time

[stivep]

I Just  woke up.
Sergh, lancaIV, Willy, forest - My response  in more accurate form may come later.
--------------------------------------------------------------
We have:
Practical Test 
- at science level:
   with use of single process only  provided by  Dr Janes,  Dr  N.Graneau, and others
   https://overunity.com/17735/kapanadze-and-other-fe-discussion/msg582770/#msg582770
   https://youtu.be/qkLGSCXOxi8?t=844 https://youtu.be/qkLGSCXOxi8?t=844 Dr Janes used only ~270V
   single impulse from capacitor.
   But: The higher is the potential The lower becomes the current when compared to
           "equal given power level." of a low voltage impulse with high current.
            That can be a millisecond impulse of 20kV, where current is many levels much lower to cause
            Dr Janes effect.**

- amateur experimenters also from  this forum:
  https://youtu.be/Dx7lm0giTDs?t=329  Tommey Red
  https://youtu.be/RnXgIHwI2_k?t=26   TinselKoala
  This is especially important  as an independent test - Tommey is not in favor with me personally.
-  amateur experimenters other than  from  this forum:
   https://youtu.be/x8SKce1OneE?t=186 * 47m high  flying rocket  as a result of the process.


-Practical Test   using  above process with addition of  "A to B"
- https://overunity.com/17735/kapanadze-and-other-fe-discussion/msg582676/#msg582676
 

Resonating Load  DUT disintegrated quite rapidly ,along with entire floating test base
  as result of the process involving H2O in the right proportion.

  Tests in Trojmiasto - merge  of these two independent processes was convincing.
__________________________________________________________________________

Summary:
At  anecdotal  level https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q0i67E48OV0&t=87s
At  science level  -Practical Test  conformed  phenomena in question.
At  amateur research level -Practical Test  conformed  phenomena in question.
At  amateur-amateur level -Practical Test  conformed  phenomena in question.
In my comments  I published  just  ~1% of the data collected  by me .
Process  sequence mentioned :
"A to B"   tested ~5km.
- The link between A and B is dynamic.
  It means the resonating load at DUT B  is immediately seen
  by  DUT A.  _{picture : https://overunity.com/17735/kapanadze-and-other-fe-discussion/dlattach/attach/192806/
was taken from explanation: https://overunity.com/17735/kapanadze-and-other-fe-discussion/msg582214/#msg582214}
- The quality  of A to B is quite significantly visible at DUT A :
  We can compare it with  person "A" walking
   on the road rapidly falling with  one leg into the  hole in the pavement.
  The effect  is immediately "seen"
-  Mentioned by me  in an earlier comment was also: that DUT B acting as  receiver  needs a load .
    _{Note:  DUT B acting as Rx is seen at DUT A acting as Tx but  when load at DUT B is established( connected), the power drown
     from DUT A   is rapidly seen - significantly seen.}
- Now the system is ready to  launch the  impulse from DUT A .
   That, if condensed, can reach a level of kW/ms  or much, much more at /us/ps/ns from a single battery
    connected to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marx_generator **
    that is than connected to DUT A - similar to a radar forming signal.
    - So from that  perspective the DC impulse is not  very much recommended as we do not  want  AC with DC bias
       where  the slope of  the leading edge and falling edge may become significantly important
       and impulse would need to be send as  a modulating signal  instead of
       AC that acts as unmodulated carrier increasing only in   voltage level.
       Much more  efficient is   use of AC impulse from  a high ratio primary to secondary transformer.
   Starting from  that very point  the phenomena described by
   Dr James , Dr  N.Graneau are in  motion and a second process can be started.
    Most likely the load will not hold the power  of the impulse leading to
    rapid, often violent manifestation of its impact possibly affecting entire  DUT B

Explanation in form of analogy - the nature of dynamic link between DUT A and DUT B:
    _{You are the  "DUT A" in the dark room and than you feel that someone start to hold gently your hand (-that someone is  "DUT B")
     and all of the sudden your hand  is pulled  much stronger (by that "DUT B") because the load  started to pull DUT B that is pulling you.
     That "DUT B"  is in need of resistive load or  resonating load . But  resistive load dissipates impulse energy into its resistance vs the
      reactive in nature load made from LC dissipates energy into its impedance.
     To differentiate between the two there is a need to change slightly the frequency and if wee see no change to the  load value - its nature is resistive.
    If we see the impedance of the load changing than this is a load of reactive nature. - that what is expected.
    and now look again at picture here: https://overunity.com/17735/kapanadze-and-other-fe-discussion/dlattach/attach/192806/
     The only difference in distance  between A and B is that the line of sight between Yalta Crimea → and Novorossiysk, Russia is 180miles}
__________________________________________________________________________

Practical Conclusion:
DUT  B  will always have  conditions  to satisfy load conditions when at  sea.
_{- eg. Black Sea region of  southwestern port of Novorossiysk in Russia, the port of Feodosia — still in Crimea, but much further east.}
The larger the physical size of  the DUT B the better.
The need of aluminum fuse  is eliminated in salt water leading to ~47m of an object fly performance
as shown in   video marked with *
and statement  from comment quote  about   water plasma beavior in pink color
in the link : https://overunity.com/17735/kapanadze-and-other-fe-discussion/msg582770/#msg582770
Experiment in Trojmiasto also pointed  the same .
https://overunity.com/17735/kapanadze-and-other-fe-discussion/dlattach/attach/192984/
So the overall conclusion is that  water  with high  salinity leads to  much higher  performance 
of the process  involving load response.


What was not explained here:
1. Process of scanning for the load at  DUT B initiated by DUT A.
2. I didn't  describe why the resonating nature of LC parameters of the load  will likely always exist at DUT B.
3. I didn't  describe   how to differentiate between targeted DUT B and other objects at sea,  - that can
be compared to the  omnidirectional pattern  of the  vertical dipole  vs vertically polarized Yagi.
_{opinion expressed is my own.}
Wesley

[kolbacict]

while I had reading your posts it came in my mind.If connected the third electrode to the drop of water. And apply a short, weak but high-voltage pulse to it. Then a primary breakdown from the drop to the power electrodes would occur. As happens with natural lightning, a primary leader takes place. Then we won't need an easily burned jumper.