Kapanadze and other FE discussion

[AlienGrey]

Where did you get this story from?


I don't recall such a stupid statement.


I have never said the receiving end of a wireless energy harvesting system need a earth return wire. I said it might need a RF ground, but this RF ground is completely different thing.


As I said many many times (since the beginning when I rejoined this forum), I stand by the original concept of Zenneck/Sommerfeld surface wave or Tesla's surface wave, or Marconi's surface wave.


I am an independent researcher who sticks to fact. You don't need to convince me with your belief in "scalar" wave.


If you think you are well ahead of Zenneck/Sommerfeld, Tesla or Marconi, that's also fine with me.

Thanks for your 'stupid' comment which says more about you than me, I suggest you re-read your question to  your first post since my question to you
is not what you have replied to here,
As you have brought up a reference to RF earthing perhaps you can explain the difference so others can understand your reference to others.
and please keep any reply civil,

AG

[blueplanet]

Once again, I need to re-emphasize that the RF ground does NOT need any connection with the earth connection of the energy source. I have never said anything about RF earthing or whatever.  (Edit: RF ground is the same as RF ground stub.)


Zenneck wave is a well known science. Unlike the dark age, when the trolls have brainwashed the society with their negative information, a lot of scientists have nowadays published their experimental findings that are not quite consistent with the laws of relativity.  Before misleading the world with your minority opinion, please read the literature in the IEEE digital library for more background understanding first.


https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/search/searchresult.jsp?newsearch=true&queryText=zenneck%20wave


The reason why you keep arguing with me is because you have NOT read anything about surface waves, Tesla's wireless power transfer or Marconi's first breakthrough experiments done in Italy. There is a lot of important information in this surface wave. 


You might have read a lot about scalar waves from some internet sites. But if you have little or no appreciation about the implication of the Poynting vector being zero along the transmission pathway, there is no point to further any discussion.

Thanks for your 'stupid' comment which says more about you than me, I suggest you re-read your question to  your first post since my question to you
is not what you have replied to here,
As you have brought up a reference to RF earthing perhaps you can explain the difference so others can understand your reference to others.
and please keep any reply civil,

AG

[AlienGrey]

BP your bedside manner is atrocious and rude and your hyperlink points to a commercial/corporate charging information center.and does nothing to help people on this DIY thread.

The thing is Wesleys Film covers a lot of ground in his coverage, the first part is obviously about a different concept ' surface waves.
I was asking you about the Don Smith, Dally, Ruslan device. Since your 'Handle' leads one to assume your a 'Save the planet', 'Guru'
Perhaps I should have made that clearer.

What a wonderful helpful being to society you really are!

AG

[magpwr]

   Stivep:   Ok, you sound tired. I'm just a little hung over, and maybe we are also tired of hearing about all those things that we can't understand. Like Zenneck waves, and such. But, only you can understand, yet produce nothing to show for it as any type of proof.
   Ok, I will forget about the light bulb, and it's output, and focus on the source of the energy instead.
   Perhaps you'd like to show some measurements, some scope shots, explaining the output power, even without the bulb.   
   I will look over your re-posted link.  As I am more interested in being accurate, than in being nice. And to provide proof for my ideas.
   It's much easier for you Wesley if you provide some proof, then you won't have to worry about being nice, or not. Otherwise this thread is going in the direction of the original TK thread. 1500 pages, and not a single working replication. Just speculation, and talk.   
   How about if you show how and explain why the dielectric is charged, as your video with Andrea has no sound and the text is unreadable. And your video with the light bulb, is not clearly explained. At least, not to me. Or do you want us to have to guess about what is happening.

To Nickz,
I think you are being extremely inconsiderate knowing that Wesley is on Vacation at the current moment.You seems to be  arguing with him as if he is a customer support service and act like he own you something valuable.Please stop trying to ruin his vacation with his wife.Please again.

Can't you just wait for him to return back from Vacation then continue your whatever argument with him say next year.
I hope you understand.

[magpwr]

Dear magpwr
I'm taking a minute as  my wife after Hanukah and my video  making work, expects some  attention.
Please  look at application of polyphase  and effects of this application by carefully reading   US 2018/0183128 A1
https://patents.google.com/patent/US20180183128A1/en
look for word polyphase e g  [0028]
I'm sure it helps a lot.

..also some  about surface wave as "I think many of you simply do  not  understand  it  yet.

Wesley

hi stivep,
I manage to skim through the entire document in one pass.
No questions but amazed by the way Zenneck is done.
Basic findings-
1)The reason why 1.85Mhz was selected is merely to strike a balance between distance and energy density.
2)10Mhz can be used but distance will be shorter.
3)Earth besides sea and etc is considered a "lossy conducting medium".

The above experiment can be recreated especially on the transmitter side.
---------------------------------------
Interesting article but i think it is nothing to do with current amplification(for kapanadze device) to and from Earth which require using interrupted/Gated pulse to emulate a longitudinal waveform.