Kapanadze and other FE discussion

[Sergh]

exotic non-herzian effects.

Hutchison

Wow, Hutchison. Super!
But why does he wear a hat indoors and why does he build boxes of thick plywood for his experiments.
And what he could borrow from old military submarine for this.

Underwater sonar, or "The Last Thing You Hear":
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dj-Wn-di-zM

Ultrasonic levitation with very low power:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MHgVVT8xLQI

Can Ultrasonic Waves Dissolve Metal?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uRmoPc7l9qg

Multiple devices at work at once, Naval SONAR, RADAR, High power microwave, Audible Sound / Audio, ultrasound, and Radio broadcast in the FM/AM band:

https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x27rmc1

[worldcup]

 

But why does he wear a hat indoors 

...... eversince he's a crossdresser 

In past he had many YT channels, all brought down!

His YT channel as of today - https://www.youtube.com/@klingonbaronessprincesskar5519/videos

something you might like -

free energy power cell i used to make for clients
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cqFHNyDC-qA

Free. Energy unit japan
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ECwVqWS8nRM

Free energy unit japan
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FMoxBz0s1H0

and this guy INVENTOR3 and john k hutchison are good friends  https://www.youtube.com/@INVENTOR3/videos

and lot's more...cat's whiskers...nanocoated wafers....resonance ...

[AlienGrey]

...... eversince he's a crossdresser 

In past he had many YT channels, all brought down!

His YT channel as of today - https://www.youtube.com/@klingonbaronessprincesskar5519/videos

something you might like -

free energy power cell i used to make for clients
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cqFHNyDC-qA

Free. Energy unit japan
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ECwVqWS8nRM

Free energy unit japan
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FMoxBz0s1H0

and this guy INVENTOR3 and john k hutchison are good friends  https://www.youtube.com/@INVENTOR3/videos

and lot's more...cat's whiskers...nanocoated wafers....resonance ...

far too much information !

[onepower]

Later Investigators entered his land area and found heavy wires leading from the roots of trees. To these wires were attaches small arc lamps, hung in the trees. These were extinguished. They imagined this to be the explanation of his hillside sunlight. Their hasty analysis proved problematic from stories which witnesses report.  The warm and diffused sunlight which came from the ground itself around his house was not localized in specific lamps.The light came from the ground, not from the trees as before... a" whole hillside that would blossom with light"... "lit up like daytime". These observations indicate that Stubblefield had managed indeed the direct conversion of earth energy to light and warmth. This would acceptable, were Mr. Stubblefield simply working on a newer form of drawing electricity from the ground to light small arc-lamps; a feat which he had accomplished earlier. But  these kind persons could never find any evidence of arc-lighting or any other form of known lighting anywhere near the area. In their own words "the light seemed to come out from the ground itself".

This relates to Tesla and the effect is not difficult to replicate.

Look at the picture below of a power line above the ground lighting some florescent bulbs. If the power line was on the ground the bulbs would also light up and there would be no way to tell the difference just by looking at them. The bulbs light because there is a difference in potential between the ground and the atmosphere above it.

In effect this is exactly what Stubblefield and Tesla did electrifying the ground plane. So how did they do it?, we can easily replicate the effect by using a very HV Tesla coil with a spark gap and HV rectifier on the bottom near the ground.

The Tesla coil builds up to a very high voltage and discharges a large DC single impulse through the rectifier, across the spark gap into the ground plane. Since we have a rectifier at the bottom the HV impulse cannot return to the Tesla coil or alternate and it is forced to pull in new charges from the top load like a charge pump. Were pumping large HV impulses onto the ground surface. Now suppose our impulsive discharge onto the ground was of a negative polarity. Since the negative charges are alike they must repel and our large impulse spreads outward across the ground electrifying the area.

So why doesn't the negative (-) charges just conduct into the ground?. Some do however charges always move to the surface and towards the nearest opposite (+) charges. The nearest opposite (+) charges are in the (+) charged atmosphere which is why the (-) charges stay near the ground surface. Here is the trick, the HV impulse must be very large and of very short duration. The surface charge density must build up faster than it can conduct away resulting in a high charge density/energy on the ground surface.

At lower light levels we can see large blue colored corona discharges from the grass tips, shrubs, trees or any pointy material which conducts electricity. In fact, it's easy to draw arcs from the ground to any conductive objects and there is no reason we couldn't light an arc lamp a distance away.

Note the next picture below of corona discharges from plants near a thunderstorm. This is much less than 10kV/inch which some large thunderstorms can produce. In the right context this could light up a whole hillside in the evening or at night. As a kid I used to pull 1" bright blue streamers to a metal rod from my dads TV tower when a thunderstorm was still miles away. Obviously, we should never do this during a thunderstorm.

So I understand much of this stuff seems difficult or exotic but it isn't. Everything has a logical and reasonable explanation if were willing to look for it. I just explained how to replicate this effect and anyone can do it... so do it.

AC

[onepower]

Nix85
As an Engineer who has actually witnessed working FE device(s) and was called upon to verify many FE inventor/phenomena I see it differently.

For example,

Later Investigators entered his land area and found heavy wires leading from the roots of trees. To these wires were attaches small arc lamps, hung in the trees. These were extinguished. They imagined this to be the explanation of his hillside sunlight.

Most of these supposed investigators in the past were reporters having no understanding of electrical phenomena. The same reporters who wrote sensationalized articles to sell more newspapers, ergo vested interest/zero credibility. The wires to the tree roots makes sense to me as tree's are mostly water which is a better conductor than dry wood fiber or earth. In effect it's like connecting a wire to the base of an antenna. However what the reporters imagined or not 100 years ago is a mute point because they didn't understand much of anything that matters like we do.

Their hasty analysis proved problematic from stories which witnesses report.  The warm and diffused sunlight which came from the ground itself around his house was not localized in specific lamps.The light came from the ground, not from the trees as before... a" whole hillside that would blossom with light"... "lit up like daytime".

What light, how much, not from the trees but a whole hillside?. Lit up like daytime, in the daytime, lol?... it smells like bullshit I have heard countless times and it doesn't add up. It's more likely the reporters 100 years ago were seeing corona effects in the evening or night they didn't understand and sensationalized it to sell more newspapers. My favorite is the "atmospheric energy" thing most reporters claim which the actual inventor never claimed was the source of energy. Here's a clue, most reporters are paid near minimum wage and don't understand anything about the thing there supposed to be reporting on. There actual job is to sell media to promote the sales of advertising, ergo most are shills.

These observations indicate that Stubblefield had managed indeed the direct conversion of earth energy to light and warmth. This would acceptable, were Mr. Stubblefield simply working on a newer form of drawing electricity from the ground to light small arc-lamps; a feat which he had accomplished earlier. But  these kind persons could never find any evidence of arc-lighting or any other form of known lighting anywhere near the area. In their own words "the light seemed to come out from the ground itself".

Personally I follow Arthur. C. Clarke's laws...
The laws are:
1)When a distinguished but elderly scientist states that something is possible, he is almost certainly right. When he states that something is impossible, he is very probably wrong.
2)The only way of discovering the limits of the possible is to venture a little way past them into the impossible.
3)Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.

These are non-herzian effects and belong to higher orders of energy.

Here I'm not sure you understand that I'm already in agreement with you based on my last posts. Technically a HV impulse of extremely short duration is not a Hertz wave or follows the structure of a Sine wave. It's nothing like a Sine/Hertz wave and is similar to a Soliton wave having completely different properties. In this case not only is it not a Hertz wave by definition but also follows the ground plane versus the atmosphere unlike a Hertz wave. In effect, this was Nikola Tesla's main objection to the notion of Hertz waves and he claimed the "spectrum" was much larger than anyone supposed.

Here's the thing, about ten years ago I saw a UFO pull what I calculated to be 100G accelerating to beyond 60,000 mph in one half second. The person next to me saw the exact same thing as well so my theory is 99% of people don't really understand a fraction of what they claim to. Otherwise we would have a reasonable explanation for all these anomalies but we don't therefore I call bullshit.

AC