IS THIS A REACTIONLESS DRIVE OR A PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE?

[onepower]

Jerry

Thanks for that link.  Even a small, honest forum would be better than a larger, more popular one which had been corrupted.

No problem, in general most real FE researchers are just looking for a way to share information and move forward.

The really bad thing about this current situation is that any new readers who come by will likely fall for the click-bait, only to encounter some gobldy gook which gives them a brain fog.  So the hosting platform is abbeting his attack on forum based discussion.

Indeed and it's hard to separate the wheat from the chaff.

I have found many who post, even those who post there work and pictures have no real interest in moving forward. There looking for self-validation of there own theories which are often unworkable. Make no mistake there are a lot of crack pots out there however there are also many good honest people just trying to make a difference and learn.

Regards
AC

[George1]

To Jerry Volland and to onepower.
============================
You are two clumsy and unskillful paid agents of the official science mafia! And this is more than evident! But you cannot stop the technology progress! 
============================
Asking our two simple questions for the 34th time.
--------------------------------------------
1) Consider carefully and thoroughly (and many times!) the link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX14NK8GrDY  .
--------------------------------------------
2) Assume that:
a) Ma = 1 kg;
b) Mb = 4 kg; the value of Mb can be either increased or decreased as many times as you want;
c) V1 = 1m/s = const;
d) Ffr. = force of friction inside the zigzag channels = 0.0000001 N; the latter can be further decreased as many times as you want;   
e) N = number of zigzags = 10; the value of N can be either increased or decreased as many times as you want;
f) Shapes of the zigzags = sinusoids; the latter can be replaced by any other curve patterns.
--------------------------------------------
3) It is evident that if V2 = 0.6 m/s and if V3 = 0.1 m/s, then (a) the law of conservation of linear momentum is valid and (b) the law of conservation of mechanical energy is invalid.
--------------------------------------------
4) It is evident that if V2 = 0.8 m/s and if V3 = 0.3 m/s, then (a) the law of conservation of linear momentum is invalid and (b) the law of conservation of mechanical energy is valid.
--------------------------------------------
5) It is evident that both (a) the law of conservation of linear momentum and (b) the law of conservation of mechanical energy are invalid simultaneously in this special particular zigzag case, which is described in the link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX14NK8GrDY  .
--------------------------------------------
So let us ask again our two simple questions for the 34th time.
--------------------------------------------
QUESTION 1: V2 = ? (How many meters per second is V2 equal to?)
QUESTION 2: V3 = ? (How many meters per second is V3 equal to?)
--------------------------------------------
Looking forward to your two answers for the 34th time.

[George1]

To Jerry Volland.
====================
Don't beat about the bush and stop distorting my words, you clumsy and unskillful manipulator! Your masters will beat you FOR SURE because you fail again in your desperate attempts to manipulate the audience in a clumsy and unskillful manner! How much do they pay you? You are simply an unworthy person! Shame on you!
====================
I am asking (YOU PERSONALLY!) my two simple questions for the 35th time.
--------------------------------------------
1) Consider carefully and thoroughly (and many times!) the link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX14NK8GrDY  .
--------------------------------------------
2) Assume that:
a) Ma = 1 kg;
b) Mb = 4 kg; the value of Mb can be either increased or decreased as many times as you want;
c) V1 = 1m/s = const;
d) Ffr. = force of friction inside the zigzag channels = 0.0000001 N; the latter can be further decreased as many times as you want;   
e) N = number of zigzags = 10; the value of N can be either increased or decreased as many times as you want;
f) Shapes of the zigzags = sinusoids; the latter can be replaced by any other curve patterns.
--------------------------------------------
3) It is evident that if V2 = 0.6 m/s and if V3 = 0.1 m/s, then (a) the law of conservation of linear momentum is valid and (b) the law of conservation of mechanical energy is invalid.
--------------------------------------------
4) It is evident that if V2 = 0.8 m/s and if V3 = 0.3 m/s, then (a) the law of conservation of linear momentum is invalid and (b) the law of conservation of mechanical energy is valid.
--------------------------------------------
5) It is evident that both (a) the law of conservation of linear momentum and (b) the law of conservation of mechanical energy are invalid simultaneously in this special particular zigzag case, which is described in the link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX14NK8GrDY  .
--------------------------------------------
So I am asking (YOU PERSONALLY!) again my two simple questions for the 35th time.
--------------------------------------------
QUESTION 1: V2 = ? (How many meters per second is V2 equal to?)
QUESTION 2: V3 = ? (How many meters per second is V3 equal to?)
--------------------------------------------
Looking forward to your two (PERSONAL!) answers for the 35th time.
--------------------------------------------
Write two numbers only! Is this operation so difficult for a "great expert" like you?

[George1]

To Jerry Volland.
====================
35 times in a row you are not able to write down two simple numbers?! It is evident for all members of this forum who is the moron here.
====================
I am asking (YOU PERSONALLY!) my two simple questions for the 36th time.
--------------------------------------------
1) Consider carefully and thoroughly (and many times!) the link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX14NK8GrDY  .
--------------------------------------------
2) Assume that:
a) Ma = 1 kg;
b) Mb = 4 kg; the value of Mb can be either increased or decreased as many times as you want;
c) V1 = 1m/s = const;
d) Ffr. = force of friction inside the zigzag channels = 0.0000001 N; the latter can be further decreased as many times as you want;   
e) N = number of zigzags = 10; the value of N can be either increased or decreased as many times as you want;
f) Shapes of the zigzags = sinusoids; the latter can be replaced by any other curve patterns.
--------------------------------------------
3) It is evident that if V2 = 0.6 m/s and if V3 = 0.1 m/s, then (a) the law of conservation of linear momentum is valid and (b) the law of conservation of mechanical energy is invalid.
--------------------------------------------
4) It is evident that if V2 = 0.8 m/s and if V3 = 0.3 m/s, then (a) the law of conservation of linear momentum is invalid and (b) the law of conservation of mechanical energy is valid.
--------------------------------------------
5) It is evident that both (a) the law of conservation of linear momentum and (b) the law of conservation of mechanical energy are invalid simultaneously in this special particular zigzag case, which is described in the link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX14NK8GrDY  .
--------------------------------------------
So I am asking (YOU PERSONALLY!) again my two simple questions for the 36th time.
--------------------------------------------
QUESTION 1: V2 = ? (How many meters per second is V2 equal to?)
QUESTION 2: V3 = ? (How many meters per second is V3 equal to?)
--------------------------------------------
Looking forward to your two (PERSONAL!) answers for the 36th time.
--------------------------------------------
Write two numbers only! Is this operation so difficult for a "great expert" like you? Are you familiar with arithmetic? Shall I teach you a lesson? And stop behaving like an idiot! 

[ramset]

Years ago persons would use forums to hone AI


One quick method to "cut to the chase"
Was to ask the seemingly passionate presenter to take a phone call


The passion always went sideways from there ....


Here too


People play games for all manner of reasons !
None of them are good reasons!


One thing is certain
Flame wars or persons instigating such


Go to read only ( history/rules here at this forum