Simplest oscillators for DC

[Belfior]

F6FLT also was correct that the original Maxwell's equations were 20 equations with 20 unknowns and quaternion means 4D math. By raping these into vectors we lost a whole dimension, but the math got simpler for engineers to do stuff. That still means that we lost a whole dimension of stuff that does not appear in our equations.

Btw Maxwell's stuff was not published by him, but by the uni faculty.

Why I have such high regard towards Tesla is that for example his charge shuttling, that cannot be understood with vectors or tensors

https://www.freeenergyplanet.biz/energy-from-vacuum/teslas-shuttling-of-potential-energy-and-barretts-extension.html

so tesla did not do quaternion math, but he could build stuff that just did it. so he could visualize it

[lancaIV]

Spectralanalyse:
to see energy, to hear energy 4d
to see energy in mass state, to hear energy in mass state in 4 d

Fibonacci :What are these numbers of the True Scale representing ? Codex

https://worldwide.espacenet.com/searchResults?submitted=true&locale=en_EP&DB=EPODOC&ST=advanced&TI=&AB=&PN=&AP=&PR=&PD=&PA=Meta&IN=Dinnan&CPC=&IC=&Submit=Search

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=FzeZbJceKZE
thermal noise or thermal sound

" thermal rendering or thermal image "
f. e.  :
https://www.msx.org/wiki/Yamaha_CX7/128  audio-signals/ video-signals  engineering,  80'ees

https://www.simio.com/about-simio/what-is-3d-simulation-software.htm
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_reality


                                                    4d reversible                                               

                                                White Color Black                                           

                                                Black Color White

                     Magnetic Amplifier : AC-circuit, DC- controle-circuit       

                      Electric Amplifier    : AC-controle-circuit, DC- circuit

[Belfior]

Maybe even the brainwashed priests can imagine, what it means if you are trying to prove that modern science is correct opposed to if you approach free energy from a point of view that it is being withheld.

In the first case you stop investigating before experiments or you stop when the first experiment shows that some law holds true. This is the biggest reason no new discoveries have happened in 100 years. Actually something has happened, but not in the EM field of science. This is because the resistance of contemporary science is not so dominant in optical field.

The other option is much more interesting and gives you a better understanding of the subject. You start to notice problems in the equations and laws and also the fringe cases when they do not apply at all.

Why free energy is so good at hiding is that we never look deep enough. Coils and caps do not matter as much, as the stuff before them.

[lancaIV]

Belfior, really ?
Or do you (not) find the truth in https://latin.cactus2000.de/adject/showadj.php?n=reliquus               

               and in the R of             R. I. P
Torricelli,  G. Gallilei, Watt,.....  : clerus- membership

[Belfior]

http://www.academia.edu/4447360/Many_say_the_etymology_of_religion_lies_with_the_Latin_word_religare

I think we can agree that it does not mean "how to find new things" ...

What frequency does the RLC tank see, if it receives PWM signals?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pulse-width_modulation#/media/File:Delta_PWM.svg

Does it resonate on the modulated sine wave?