A SIMPLE ELECTRIC HEATER, WHICH HAS EFFICIENCY GREATER THAN 1

[lancaIV]

1000 W to 270 W to 180-150 W object- + space-heating
http://translationportal.epo.org/emtp/translate/?ACTION=description-retrieval&COUNTRY=DE&ENGINE=google&FORMAT=docdb&KIND=U1&LOCALE=en_EP&NUMBER=202008006432&OPS=ops.epo.org/3.2&SRCLANG=de&TRGLANG=en
Waterheating with infra-red waves
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=45&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20080327&CC=DE&NR=202007016567U1&KC=U1#
George1, 2x fold efficiency in relation to conventional heaters does not mean C. O. P. : 2 by Physics  !
Radiation/Convection/Conduction heat has his dis-/ad-vantages  ! Each case his appropriate solution  !
To feel physiological well in cold climate our  individual body needs only an enclosure ( heat losts insulation) and max. electric 12 Watt heat power,
( in the 90' by thick cable- array 80 Watt,  reduced by nanofibers use to 12 W)
the rest goes to relatively uncontroled space and object heating  !
Beside ambient temperature the human genetical sensibility related humidity/ temperature/ moving air is not the same  ! ( Tests in dry air cryo- climate chambers with thermografical skinreaction comparison)

Writing about C. O. P.  is ever "Carnot thermo-dynamic cycle" related,  reaching the ideal point : eta=1,
an up to 99% ideal point near device : diode-array
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=0&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19941018&CC=US&NR=5356484A&KC=A#
a quantum- mechanical heat pump
Classical Voltage to quantum eV( ancient erg/ dyn- unit) and thermalaccustic unit : dB = thermal noise
To understand efficiency and C. O. P.  I would recommend to study thermo- : Seebeck-/Peltier- elements,
for heating or cooling in use.

https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=de&sl=de&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fclausmeier.tripod.com%2Fstrahlg.htm

[George1]

Good explanations, lancaIV! Thank you very much for them.
1) But I was misguided by text, describing Mr. Filip's heaters. Actually it's a matter of a 50% decrease of the consumed energy as only the infrared component of the Joule's heat remains the same.
2) And the other misjudgment related to COP. Yes, I understand this. But actually this is a fault of those who write the related texts. They have to specify what exactly they mean.
3) About Seebeck-/Peltier- elements and effect. Thank you for this recommendation of yours! This is because some years ago together with a friend of mine we worked over a device based on Seebeck-Peltier effect. I will re-fresh my memory with pleasure.
4) Please give us some time to consider carefully the last posts you have sent to us.
Regards,
George   

[lancaIV]

Working with thermal processes :
https://www.khanacademy.org/test-prep/mcat/chemical-processes/thermochemistry/a/endothermic-vs-exothermic-reactions

[George1]

Hi lancaIV,
Thank you for re-freshing my elementary school knowedge. You made me younger for a while! Although many things in our educational programs as if have to be re-considered. For example: "When chemical bonds are formed, heat is released, and when chemical bonds are broken, heat is absorbed." Who has ever seen a chemical bond? Or an atom? Or a molecule? These are abstractions, which work well in many practical cases, but at the same time they generate much more questions than answers. (Of course, this is my personal opinion and I woud not like to press anybody to agree with me.)
Looking forward to your answer.
Regards,
George     

[George1]

Hi lancaIV,
Professor Kanarev's points of view and approaches are extremely interesting and original. It seems to me that (at least theoretically) some of his water-electrolysis-related research works unambiguously manifest outlet energy/inlet energy > 1. Keep reading.
What is your opinion about Prof. Kanarev's research works?
Regards, 
George