"Quantum Receiver".

[skywatcher]

I sent a PM to Lidmotor some minutes ago. Maybe he finds some time to post something here.   

The 'theory' about the special 13.56 MHz frequency is still beyond me.


I think the most important point is to get a *concrete* and *detailed* description how to set up an experiment which shows unusual effects. The description should include everything necessary to replicate it. In the videos not everything is clearly visible and not everything is explained. I don't have the time to figure everything out by try and error. This might take months or years. I want to see something 'special' which convinces me that there is something worth investigating, and if i have seen this i will invest more time and effort into it. But i'm not willing to invest my time without seeing any positive results, and others telling me 'you did something wrong' all the time.   

One of the basic principles of science is that everything is published i a way which allows others to reproduce the results without needing to start from scratch every time.

[skywatcher]

Additional remark on describing experiments:

In some cases videos are fine, but in most cases some high-resolution photos together with a written explanation gives a much better understanding.

Many videos on YT are blurry and shaky, the camera is held with one hand and with the other hand something is done, the audio often is hard to understand (especially if it's not your native language) and all this leaves you wondering about the details. Sometimes i wonder why people still seem to use 30 year old camera equipment. High-resolution cameras are affordable for everyone today. And any still picture is better than a underexposed, blurry and shaky video.

[synchro1]

1352 in Mayan: Look at the values of the number places.

top=400

middle=20


bottom=1

[Toolofcortex]

*concrete* and *detailed*

This site has been replaced by space cadet autists and delusionnal ego types that spin their wheels in a loop.

[synchro1]

Additional remark on describing experiments:

In some cases videos are fine, but in most cases some high-resolution photos together with a written explanation gives a much better understanding.

Many videos on YT are blurry and shaky, the camera is held with one hand and with the other hand something is done, the audio often is hard to understand (especially if it's not your native language) and all this leaves you wondering about the details. Sometimes i wonder why people still seem to use 30 year old camera equipment. High-resolution cameras are affordable for everyone today. And any still picture is better than a underexposed, blurry and shaky video.

Try and get something from that frequency the way Strffler does, by just oscillating a piece of tinfoil with the capacitance from your scope electrode at frequency with No Power!