Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Simple and powerful principle

Started by nix85, March 17, 2020, 07:30:59 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Leely

I believe that magicians were the ones that built the pyramids of Egypt., because their magicians were in support of the people's  doing. Magic could put a pen through a glass bottle, then people are shown. How was it done? It is magic. So magic could actually carry weights you know.

Turbo

Government funded Troll that quickly wants to bury the valuable info on the previous page.

nix85

"in https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7-5qd7bEiqA&t=897s  between about 12 and 20 minutes you see the operation of their system - it's all in water! They need compressors to have the units air filled while rising and water filled while sinking. In my version you just use the trapped bubble of air on one sealed side of the towers to have an air return."


Their system is not good. And your system is same as mine first drawing. In both one needs to lift the weight at the top and transfer it to other  side to be dropped. Once again, this is interesting OU principle but is too primitive.

hdeasy

Quote from: nix85 on May 26, 2020, 09:59:29 AM
...
Their system is not good. And your system is same as mine first drawing. In both one needs to lift the weight at the top and transfer it to other  side to be dropped. Once again, this is interesting OU principle but is too primitive.


Granted. Now all that needs to be done is to automate it. If even 100Kg weights could b used. and a tower of 2.0387m height, then energy gained per weight and ascent is E = mgh = 100x9.81x 2.0387= 2000J. If your automation process could shift it over within 1s,
then if there is a steady stream of weights, that could give up to 2kW. You's have to go to a wider or taller system to get more. Wider as if you want 1000Kg you may need a wider weight with lighter material padded round. Or if you expand vertically you need more leg room upwards.

nix85

Quote from: hdeasy on May 26, 2020, 11:18:59 AM

Granted. Now all that needs to be done is to automate it. If even 100Kg weights could b used. and a tower of 2.0387m height, then energy gained per weight and ascent is E = mgh = 100x9.81x 2.0387= 2000J. If your automation process could shift it over within 1s,
then if there is a steady stream of weights, that could give up to 2kW. You's have to go to a wider or taller system to get more. Wider as if you want 1000Kg you may need a wider weight with lighter material padded round. Or if you expand vertically you need more leg room upwards.

I did similar calculation, it is very very low power output, even with weights like 10 tons. For the 10th time, this is NOT a good OU principle for energy generation.

I said it in other threads, i'll say it again, focus on lenz neutralization, air cores and right angles.