Simple and powerful principle

[perpetual]

Travis is back, he has already proven it's self-running in 2010.
he is looking for funds to build even bigger one

https://www.youtube.com/@waynetravis6951

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z_MLjkt8ti4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wqbJWBtoFMQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uTbIJnEOw8Y

pressure = force / area (means small amount of water in narrow high tube can explode a barrel below)

Nix

[endlessoceans]

Travis is back, he has already proven it's self-running in 2010.
he is looking for funds to build even bigger one

https://www.youtube.com/@waynetravis6951

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z_MLjkt8ti4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wqbJWBtoFMQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uTbIJnEOw8Y

pressure = force / area (means small amount of water in narrow high tube can explode a barrel below)

Nix

Visually it appears as less energy used but this is not more m=out than in.  YES he is using less air but the DEPTH of water displaced requres greater pressure, he is merely playing with an analogue version of volts vs amps. 

Also.....seriously...he is displacing the air and looking at volume only with his LUNGS.  Hardly a scientific CONTROLLED experiment.  If he measures the pressure it takes between comparing the two jars he will find the energy used to pump the air regardless of volume is the same. 

Then finally....his big ungainly contraption and its low output with countless moving parts and methods of generating the electricty from all that slow lumbering movement are just tallying up to loss after loss in conversion.   Yes....a 4 tonne ugly unit to not even power my cellphone.

[perpetual]

Visually it appears as less energy used but this is not more m=out than in.  YES he is using less air but the DEPTH of water displaced requres greater pressure, he is merely playing with an analogue version of volts vs amps. 

Also.....seriously...he is displacing the air and looking at volume only with his LUNGS.  Hardly a scientific CONTROLLED experiment.  If he measures the pressure it takes between comparing the two jars he will find the energy used to pump the air regardless of volume is the same. 

Then finally....his big ungainly contraption and its low output with countless moving parts and methods of generating the electricty from all that slow lumbering movement are just tallying up to loss after loss in conversion.   Yes....a 4 tonne ugly unit to not even power my cellphone.

While it is obvious this is one of the simplest, most primitive overunity principles, overunity it is nonetheless and he has looped it back in 2010., believe it or not.

As for your 'argument' that the narrower one requires more pressure is a common skeptical 'argument', if you listen to linked video part 5 above he says that splitter is adjusted so that air volume coming out is the same on either side.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uW0LKPM0Tvk

His contraption is indeed big and ungainly, and as i said one of more primitive ones, but still overunity it is.

Nix

[Willy]

Re the Wayne Travis device.

1. There are two air tubes.

2. The tubes vent into the aquarium at the same depth (bottom of the aquarium)
they will therefore oppose the same water pressure.

3. If the tubes split off from the same air pump, have the same length and
diameter as each other, they each will therefore the inject the same volume of
air into the tank within any given period of time.

4. If the tubes split off from the same air pump, have the same length and
diameter as each other, they each will therefore the inject the same volume of
air into each of the vessels in any given length of time.

5. The one vessel rises to the surface before the other.  Therefore if given a longer
run time and a heavier weight, it could have instead of rising sooner, lifted a heavier
weight to the surface, than the other vessel lifted ? ? ?

6. This would be more weight lifted to the same height but for the same energy input.

[Willy]

Re the Wayne Travis device.

           continued

In the video @ Travis Effect Demo 5 - Work Race with Travis Effect VS Standard - YouTube

Neither vessel is being filled with air as efficiently as would be the case,
when the hoses are instead connected to a barbed fitting on the tops of each vessel.
As it is in the video, all of the air is pumped out at the maximum of pressure.
Air is being pumped to greater depth (against greater water pressure) than is needed
in order to put the same volumes at depth, of air into the vessel. 

The air at more shallow depths of the containers (the upper interior areas of the containers)
could have been placed there using less energy, although, more and more energy is expended
per unit of volume of air, as the vessels fill with air and the water in the vessels is being
pushed out the bottoms of the vessels.  This is because the air is being pushed to greater
and greater depth.

Independent controlling of the rates of air flow does not change the energy needed to
push a given volume of air to a given depth in the water.