Bill Gates - will he try to force vaccinate you soon ?

[lancaIV]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Declaration_of_Human_Duties_and_Responsibilities


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Millennium_Development_Goals


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Millennium_Declaration


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Family_planning





I am not here as Mister William Gates his "advocatus angeliis",but there are some points to explain,independent a-/or theistic :


Old Testament,"The Flood" : not an eugenical or Triage act by the ancient Godness ?!








More saekular/profan  : https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=de&sl=de&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fde.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FWeltbev%25C3%25B6lkerungskonferenz  included NGO´s


extraction :  Reproductive Health and Reproductive Rights


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_and_reproductive_health_and_rights


extraction :                           Change in values


From 8 billions actual to 1,5 billions as first future target : more than less 15-10% from actual planetary inhabitant density and numbers ! > - 75% !




Sincerely


OCWL



Let me be radical : Mr. Gates dies in the next time,but the millenial Goals are independent from him,a country,an organisation or a computer model(l) !




"Menschenproduktionsfarm" : https://www.zeit.de/2014/07/szenario-schrumpfende-weltbevoelkerung/seite-3



Negative exponential growth works the same way, just the other way around: an initially gradual decline in population turns into a self-reinforcing shrinking process. Where few children are born, only a few potential parents grow up. These in turn have just as few children as their parents, and so the decline continues.


The descendants would have to have three or four children to stop this process.


But that is highly unlikely in developed countries. At the end of the 1960s, women had five children on a global average. Today there are only 2.5. Since then, the growth rate of mankind has almost halved from 2.1 to below 1.2 percent. This does not automatically mean an end to population growth: on the one hand, people are getting older, so they remain part of the world population for longer. On the other hand, today's "low" growth assumes a base of 7.2 billion people and thus more than twice as many individuals as in the 1960s. The large steamer world population, which was traveling at full speed for a long time, has a very, very long braking distance. It will take a few more decades before it comes to a standstill. But it is certain that he will do it.


The best known estimates of the future number of people come from the United Nations Population Department. They usually contain three variants to record development options. In the latest estimates, the UN's mid-range version assumes that around 9.6 billion people will share the globe in 2050 - 2.4 billion more than in 2014. At some point in the second half of the 21st century, population growth is likely to end . Many of the people on earth who are living today can therefore see population growth reaching its peak.


.......


Alternatively, the UN researchers have calculated a high and a low scenario: The high variant assumes that after 2100 the number of children in all countries will settle at a value of 2.35 per woman (today's value of Argentina) low variant assumes 1.85 (the value of Denmark). In the first case, 2,300 around 36 billion people live on Earth - five times as many as today. In the second case, the global population shrinks to 2.3 billion by 2300 - less than a third of today's value. After that, mankind would halve again until 2550, falling to the level of 1850.




a. PHYSICAL ENTROPHIE https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entropie#Entropie_als_%E2%80%9EMa%C3%9F_der_Unordnung%E2%80%9C


b. NUMERICAL HUMAN NUMBER ENTROPHY     by not /"conditionized fertility right"

https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=de&sl=de&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fde.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FInwohner

  https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=de&sl=de&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fde.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FPolitischer_Ehekonsens

+- Balance of ideal number : 300 millions human habitants on earth
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=de&sl=de&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fde.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FAllgemeines_Gleichgewichtsmodell

[MasterPlaster]

Who Controls the Gates Family?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dX9O3Yi-Nn0

[onepower]

Paul-R

If he was planning to kill well over 630million people, do you think he would be talking about it at an open forum?

For crying out aloud, Stefan - listen to the video. In that sentance, he speaks of healthcare issues - contraception etc. The percentage of unplanned pregnancies is what he is talking about.

That's exactly what I heard as well and a person has to wonder how someone can jump from population reduction through birth control to murder through vaccinations. Bill gates was clearly referring to increasing access to birth control so women have a choice which generally leads to less children and a decreasing population.

In my opinion this is more of the same old anti-science/war of facts rhetoric from the populists. It really irritates a lot of people that Bill Gates is the second wealthiest man on the planet, educated, intelligent and a very well spoken person. Versus the populist hero, the groper and chief, three time draft dodger and narcissistic abusive compulsive liar donny trump. It triggers them to no end that Bill Gates makes more on the interest from his wealth in a year than donny trump is worth because Bill is a genius and donny is a con man who got lucky.

I respect Bill Gates because of what he has accomplished and because he calls it as he see's it based on the facts and science. While donny trump tries to blow imaginary sunshine up everyone's arse to serve his own personal interests. 

The unavoidable truth is that 50 years from now Bill Gates will be remembered as the guy who revolutionized the computer industry right next to Steve Jobs. However donny trump is going to be remembered as the compulsive lying clown gaslighting everyone on twitter, who couldn't keep his mouth shut about anything and basically turned the U.S. economy and values into a dumpster fire. Anyway you look at it it's like putting lipstick on a pig.

Regards

[Magluvin]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C2Mdf_1LuZI
less than 1 min.  Clearly states we must reduce population, and first on the list is better vaccines.

Mags

[Paul-R]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C2Mdf_1LuZI
less than 1 min.  Clearly states we must reduce population, and first on the list is better vaccines.

Mags

... and then he said "health care and reproductive health services". What do you think he meant by that?
Why did you leave that out of your message above?