Acoustical feedback energy system

[aleks]

Thanks for your comment, Willy, you've got my reasoning about electrons right.


Here's an interesting video about electron beam: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NuL8a3QZSnk


Like in Tesla coils it does not require a circuit to beam energy. Touching it with fingers without problems. Where does energy go?

[aleks]

We are a long way from the topic of Acoustical feedback energy system. Sorry.

No, this is completely on-topic. I'm trying to make an explanation why speaker-soundwave opposition may yield free energy.

[aleks]

It is a definite that a greater amount of energy can be obtained, by the common electrolysis of water

Where does that energy come from ?

I can't say for sure, but since electrolysis involves electric current in a highly-turbulent medium (water), the energy may come from collapsing electrons as well, the way I'm trying to explain.

[Willy]

I can't say for sure, but since electrolysis involves electric current in a highly-turbulent medium (water), the energy may come from collapsing electrons as well, the way I'm trying to explain.

There is no over unity in the conventional electrolysis.

The joules of energy as electric input are equal to the joules of heat energy
produced in the electrolyte by ohmic resistance plus the heat of the combustion
of the hydrogen and oxygen,

Except there may be some recombination of hydrogen and oxygen within the
electrolyte solution itself.

The over unity occurs when the electrolysis system is combined with the buoyancy
system.

Hydrogen from the electrolysis is allowed to rise in the atmosphere instead of
burning it.

When a weight object is lifted by the hydrogen's rise in atmosphere, the kinetic
energy potential present in that lifted object at height, can be very very much so greater
than any energy expended in that hydrogen production itself. 

Very very very large potential energy can be thusly obtained.

[aleks]

There is no over unity in the conventional electrolysis.

Hydrogen from the electrolysis is allowed to rise in the atmosphere instead of
burning it.

Are you talking about a model? I do not understand how raising hydrogen increases energy of the outcome: free-raising hydrogen actually loses potential energy, because pushing it back down will require energy. On another note, I did read/hear somewhere that some inventors get a lot more hydrogen than anticipated, hence collapsing electrons must be involved in the process. I can visualize a turbulence causing local electric current vortices and collisions of electron fields.