Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

[Lottalead]

 

[rakarskiy]

Hi  OnePower!

This is the explanation of "highly educated" electrical engineers

Once the current starts flowing through the armature conductor, there is one reverse effect of this current on the main field flux of the alternator (or synchronous generator). This inverse effect is called the armature response in an alternator or synchronous generator. In other words, the effect of the armature (stator) flux on the flux created by the rotor field poles is called the armature response.
We already know that the current-carrying conductor creates its own magnetic field, and this magnetic field affects the main magnetic field of the generator.
It has two undesirable effects: it either distorts the main field or reduces the flux of the main field, or both. They impair the performance of the machine. When the field is distorted, it is known as the cross-magnetization effect. And when the field flux is reduced, it is called the demagnetizing effect

You just have to ask them to sketch and show you on their fingers how it happens. The situation is even worse with phase calculations and the work of the generator itself to produce electricity. I don't even want to mention the transformer.
***

Robert Holcomb, M.D., a neurologist, was, according to my information, a very successful magnetotherapist. I know a little bit about electro-magnetic therapy, their device, action and complexities, plus the demand for real, healing technology. Holcomb's family business is just electrical engineering, he's known about electricity and electrical machines since childhood. I think of the "clownish" explanation of how electric generators work from education, he's heard since childhood. Why did Holcomb's work work out? It's fortunate that a researcher with his opinion, experience in magnetism was given a technical platform with a license to do the work. In designing electric machines, designing a traditional synchronous generator is the ultimate aerobatics.  At the same time, controlling the excitation of the mechanical electromagnetic rotor is a solvable task. But if you ask an electrical engineer what is the EMF in phase under load, he will swim. You won't find that kind of data in educational materials . So Dr. Holcomb is a master-creator of aerobatics, in the design of an electric generator, he was able to replace the mechanical electromagnetic rotor in the generator, by a static (solid-state) electromagnetic rotor.

And the whole "herd" of traditional electrical engineers and electrodynamic physicists will tell you that this is impossible, the electron does not work that way.

***
https://rakatskiy.blogspot.com/2022/06/overunity-holcomb-energy-system.html

[rakarskiy]

Once again, I will give my opinion, which has not changed since my first statement about the work of the НES.

Robert Holcomb's solid state synchronous machine, works on the algorithm of a traditional electromechanical synchronous machine, generating electricity. A solid state rotor is a system of electromagnets that mimic the action of a mechanical magnetic rotor. The task is to create a magnetic excitation flux, hold it and move it in the stator and rotor, synchronously inducing EMF in the generator phases. When a load is connected, the excited current in the phase wires amplifies the magnetic field of the system's magnetic flux. The magnetic flux [ϕ] has a constant component, both for a traditional electromechanical generator machine and for a Holcomb solid state machine. The Holcomb machine, like the synchronous generator, depends heavily on the connected load to create a working rotating field.

Comparative figure of synchronous generator with mechanical electromagnetic rotor and НES

Dr. Holcomb's basic thesis that he can take any four-pole synchronous generator stator of suitable size for his solid state rotor, and run it to generate electricity of appropriate power, is a testament to the way his system works.
****

https://rakatskiy.blogspot.com/2022/06/overunity-holcomb-energy-system.html

[TommeyReed]

Rakarskiy,

You and many on this forum are pushing claims that are not verify in anyway.

"Dr. Holcomb's basic thesis that he can take any four-pole synchronous generator stator of suitable size for his solid state rotor, and run it to generate electricity of appropriate power, is a testament to the way his system works."....This is like saying a can take any shovel and pile up BS!

Now if I'm wrong about Holcomb with enough research of other who invested money on a none working system. Then I'm man enough to say I was wrong.

For those who are pushing this non proven Holcomb claims should be removed from OU for misleading others.

I know, I have no clue how Holcomb system works. Yeah, a little snake oil with simple solid state relay not including software can do wonders of making other think this is over unity.

The real facts is to have a claim of COP of 4, why even have it even connected to the grid? Now the COP is much lower ever wonder why?

Many of you claim to know how it works, yet not a single person has built a single working model, why not to complicated? SL wanted me to build a custom winding machine, are you all that incompetent to even build one yourself?

For those who are questioning my motive, I don't want these few so called experts to mislead others on these forum. This forum has a history of false claims and some of it is by these same people pushing this Holcomb device!

Please do some research on the history of this company and ask yourself why no one can show a unit working to this day as claimed to be even a COP of 1!

Tom

[rakarskiy]

TommeyReed, You are entitled to your point of view, (works or does not work).

Accuse, having your point of view as a basis, of fraud without good reason (facts) is not.

Give your point of view - "why Holcomb system cannot work" - only by specifications, calculations and other verifiable methods.


I have made my point of view, to deny it is the same as to deny efficiency of traditional synchronous generators with core.

https://rakatskiy.blogspot.com/2022/06/overunity-holcomb-energy-system.html


Meanwhile, all you have is drool and diarrhea.

Personally I am not interested, what Dr. Holcomb is a businessman, I am interested only - what he is a design engineer. Creation of similar solid-state rotor for synchronous generator, it is already technology, and I do not see any design bureau which make synchronous generators, that they disclose their design solutions - technology.

Why does Dr. Holcomb have to prove anything to you personally?

I have little interest in Holcomb's business plans and the risks associated with investing in this project. I am only interested in the technology, which should not be closed.