Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

Started by ramset, March 14, 2022, 11:07:24 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 60 Guests are viewing this topic.

stivep

Quote from: stivep on August 03, 2022, 02:47:00 PM
__________________________________________________________________________________________
When you look at video posted by me my post was very much on the topic of what they call here "electrical steel."
https://youtu.be/DNxob3yY4LE
You have the same attempt there ,of getting 15kW form 10W.

LET"S TALK ABOUT IMPOSSIBLE:
theoretically assuming that for some incredibly uncommon reason Holcomb was right
and he used concept  of Ted Annis presented by me in my video .
years before - than all his work may be free for us to use, as
I actually pointed at material used by Ted Annis in my video and Ted is the owner of application that
once proven that it works makes Ted the owner of the rights to technology.
Marconi  lost patent rights to Tesla, for wireless technology...............
start to watch it exactly from here
https://youtu.be/DNxob3yY4LE?t=121

and compare it to SolarLab text picture here:
https://overunity.com/19069/holcomb-energy-systemsbreakthrough-technology-to-the-world/dlattach/attach/188010/image//




It looks like he was researching the same problem but without use of  rotation.
For you to better understand it.
Holcomb success may automatically approve Ted Annis application to a patent  by means of  priority date.

I visited him and I can call him at any time.
He is the guy who may agree for his technology to be licensed free or almost  free worldwide.
Wesley

bistander

Quote from: Jimboot on August 03, 2022, 06:25:25 PM
My understanding is that the strength of the field is determined by voltage (AT) & frequency but is not dependent on current? Which is another reason I like this idea.

Hi Jimboot,
Current plays a big-time role whereas frequency isn't even mentioned. Often confusing.... Strength, intensity, density, and so forth.
Encyclopaedia Britannica does a decent definition. Copied and pasted for your convenience.

"
Encyclopaedia Britannica

magnetic field strength

physics

Actions

Alternate titles: magnetic field intensity, magnetic intensity

By The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica • Edit History

magnetic field strength
Home
Science
Physics
Matter & Energy
magnetic field strength
physics
Alternate titles: magnetic field intensity, magnetic intensity
By The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica • Edit History

magnetic field strength, also called magnetic intensity or magnetic field intensity, the part of the magnetic field in a material that arises from an external current and is not intrinsic to the material itself. It is expressed as the vector H and is measured in units of amperes per metre. The definition of H is H = B/μ − M, where B is the magnetic flux density, a measure of the actual magnetic field within a material considered as a concentration of magnetic field lines, or flux, per unit cross-sectional area; μ is the magnetic permeability; and M is the magnetization. The magnetic field H might be thought of as the magnetic field produced by the flow of current in wires and the magnetic field B as the total magnetic field including also the contribution M made by the magnetic properties of the materials in the field. When a current flows in a wire wrapped on a soft-iron cylinder, the magnetizing field H is quite weak, but the actual average magnetic field (B) within the iron may be thousands of times stronger because B is greatly enhanced by the alignment of the iron's myriad tiny natural atomic magnets in the direction of the field.

magnetic field, a vector field in the neighbourhood of a magnet, electric current, or changing electric field, in which magnetic forces are observable. Magnetic fields such as that of Earth cause magnetic compass needles and other permanent magnets to line up in the direction of the field. Magnetic fields force moving electrically charged particles in a circular or helical path. This force—exerted on electric currents in wires in a magnetic field—underlies the operation of electric motors. (For more information about magnetic fields, see magnetism.

Around a permanent magnet or a wire carrying a steady electric current in one direction, the magnetic field is stationary and referred to as a magnetostatic field. At any given point its magnitude and direction remain the same. Around an alternating current or a fluctuating direct current, the magnetic field is continuously changing its magnitude and direction.

Magnetic fields may be represented by continuous lines of force or magnetic flux that emerge from north-seeking magnetic poles and enter south-seeking magnetic poles. The density of the lines indicates the magnitude of the magnetic field. At the poles of a magnet, for example, where the magnetic field is strong, the field lines are crowded together, or more dense. Farther away, where the magnetic field is weak, they fan out, becoming less dense. A uniform magnetic field is represented by equally spaced parallel straight lines. The direction of the flux is the direction in which the north-seeking pole of a small magnet points. The lines of flux are continuous, forming closed loops. For a bar magnet, they emerge from the north-seeking pole, fan out and around, enter the magnet at the south-seeking pole, and continue through the magnet to the north pole, where they again emerge. The SI unit for magnetic flux is the weber. The number of webers is a measure of the total number of field lines that cross a given area.

Magnetic fields may be represented mathematically by quantities called vectors that have direction as well as magnitude. Two different vectors are in use to represent a magnetic field: one called magnetic flux density, or magnetic induction, is symbolized by B; the other, called the magnetic field strength, or magnetic field intensity, is symbolized by H. The magnetic field H might be thought of as the magnetic field produced by the flow of current in wires and the magnetic field B as the total magnetic field including also the contribution made by the magnetic properties of the materials in the field. When a current flows in a wire wrapped on a soft-iron cylinder, the magnetizing field H is quite weak, but the actual average magnetic field (B) within the iron may be thousands of times stronger because B is greatly enhanced by the alignment of the iron's myriad tiny natural atomic magnets in the direction of the field. See also magnetic permeability."

LINK
https://www.britannica.com/science/magnetic-field-strength

bi

onepower

stivep
QuoteWe may think that Holcomb is extracting energy from.. From what?
magnetic domain?
free electrons,? – this can only move under external force called voltage- difference of potentials.?
I am in disagreement with statement that Holcomb energy source would never end.
There is no such thing as conversion of energy from empty car tank, or empty bucket.

I agree and you are asking perfectly reasonable questions any credible Engineer or Scientist should ask.

From Part III, Holcomb states a weak magnetic field aligns the magnetic domains of the steel.
Then during the process of alignment they are supposedly organized and sequenced by another computer controlled process.
The combined processes are claimed to produce more output power than initially put into the process.

I think most people have problems with this for several reasons as you implied...
1)There is no detailed description of the whole process, what, when, where, why and how?.
2)There is no detailed working theory as to where the extra energy comes from as it relates to the Conservation of Energy.
Energy cannot be created or destroyed only transformed.
3)All the important information which makes this technology work is not present in any of there literature.

However as an Engineer/Inventor I can understand why Holcomb is doing what he is.
Throughout our history countless scientist/inventors gave everything to science and in return they were branded heretics, there life destroyed and left destitute.
T.H.Moray, Nikola Tesla, Viktor Schauberger, Lester Hendershot, Kapanadze/Ruslan and the long list goes on.
The unfortunate truth is that we inventors are outnumbered a million to one by self serving assholes who care only about profits and power.

Look at this thread on TinselKoala here...https://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?PHPSESSID=2sdr25ub0m1mmm9q7al3iup306&topic=4319.msg99789;topicseen#msg99789
The guy spent a lifetime looking for answers, he was a good and fair critic of FE and I respected him for that.
He spent decades fighting the good fight asking the hard questions lesser men were afraid to ask.
He probably gave more to the FE community than most here and now he has nothing to show for it. If that isn't a fucking tragedy I'm not sure what is...

So yes, it's about time we inventors protected our interests.
Look at Elon Musk, nobody tells him what to do and he has the wealth and power to run with any technology he wants.
He is disruptive to every tech sector he enters, he doesn't ask permission, he doesn't give a damn what most believe, he destroys the competition and that's how real men get shit done.

Make no mistake, the time for trying to convince the misinformed masses that we are destroying the planet and there are better technologies out there has long since past.
There is no convincing anyone of anything in my opinion. Let them believe whatever nonsensical bs they want but when there neighbor has no utility bill that's the kind of thing that really changes minds...

Regards
AC








SolarLab

Quote from: stivep on August 03, 2022, 07:44:19 PM
LET"S TALK ABOUT IMPOSSIBLE:

Assuming that for some incredibly uncommon reason Holcomb was right   
But he used concept presented by me
years before


- than all his work may be free for us to use, as I actually pointed at material used by Tom Annis in my video and Tom is the owner of application that
once proven that it works makes Tom the owner of the rights to technology.
Marconi  lost patent rights to Tesla, for wireless technology...............
start to watch it exactly from here
https://youtu.be/DNxob3yY4LE?t=121

and compare it to SolarLab text picture here:
https://overunity.com/19069/holcomb-energy-systemsbreakthrough-technology-to-the-world/dlattach/attach/188010/image//

It looks like he was researching the same problem but without use of  rotation.
For you to better understand it.
Holcomb success may automatically approve Ted Annis application to a patent  by means of  priority date.

I visited him and I can call him at any time.
He is the guy who may agree for his technology to be licensed free or almost  free worldwide.
Wesley

Assuming that for some incredibly uncommon reason Holcomb was right   
"But he used concept presented by me
years before"
---------------------

"Before long you'll be claiming that you actually invented it!"

Boy, that didn't take long! 3hrs:45min  ;D

Quote from: SolarLab on August 03, 2022, 03:58:55 PM


Convincing you that the Holcomb devices can, in reality, create Excess Energy is rather pointless.

You're free to believe whatever you want, as we all are. But, believing what can actually be seen inside
Holcomb's Lab - working devices - FPL datasets, varification documents, CAE analysis, eye witness
testimonies and on and on is more than good enough for me.

So, believe what your mind is telling you. That's no problem at all for the rest of us who have been there and
done that.

No amount of factual based evidence or solid science and engineering will change your mind - so it's not a
big deal in the whole chain of things.

Before long you'll be claiming that you actually invented it!    :)



stivep

SolarLab. You are asking for explanation.
It is not me but Ted Annis.
I only pointed at right material to be used and made video.
here:
https://youtu.be/DNxob3yY4LE?t=121
Please don't attack me. Just live me alone.
I hope you remember  effect of your behavior  few years ago.
Pushing, bending, kicking is not the way to go.
Not answering questions, insulting, calling with names doesn't help you.
e.g:
Quote from: SolarLab on July 31, 2022, 02:14:27 PM
deception, trolling, not doing the required work and lying!

Contribution to the subject should be seen as a value coming from critics of technology as this makes all of the others to think and respond.


You losing audience trust, and  support by silly answers and accusations.
Pushing me to respond  in your style makes it even worse.
I'm friendly , helpful and cooperative.. but everything has its limit.
Wesley