Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

Started by ramset, March 14, 2022, 11:07:24 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 42 Guests are viewing this topic.

kolbacict

Quote from: rakarskiy on January 12, 2023, 12:46:08 AM


The question is not for physics, she already claims that the ferro material strengthens and creates its own field greater than the excitation. A question for an engineering solution to get more output.

The fact that the field is stronger in iron is clear. But we need not in iron, but in another, secondary winding. Probably when the field enters the iron, it intensifies, and when it exits towards the other winding, it weakens again. Is this the problem?

rakarskiy

SL you just don't understand a little what you're dealing with. Any control scheme is secondary, to the system of a controlled process it is secondary. I'll give you a simple example. The definition of mass is a measure of the inertia of matter. the magnetic field is matter. Imagine that you have a flywheel and you spin it to the maximum. Then you need to change the direction of rotation of the flywheel. The same must be done with the magnetic flux, the magnetic field is matter. Mathematics sometimes plays a cruel joke in understanding processes.
This is just an episode of many processes in the solid state generator system.

SolarLab

Quote from: rakarskiy on January 12, 2023, 03:23:53 AM
SL you just don't understand a little what you're dealing with. Any control scheme is secondary, to the system of a controlled process it is secondary. I'll give you a simple example. The definition of mass is a measure of the inertia of matter. the magnetic field is matter. Imagine that you have a flywheel and you spin it to the maximum. Then you need to change the direction of rotation of the flywheel. The same must be done with the magnetic flux, the magnetic field is matter. Mathematics sometimes plays a cruel joke in understanding processes.
This is just an episode of many processes in the solid state generator system.

Rakarskiy,

Check out the simulation animated gifs presented in the OUR Holcomb thread - the flux in the LinGen "rolls." The sequence
is set by the controller (microprocessor timing sequence).

Maybe your confused when I say "Controller" - it's the STM32xxx microcontroller or microprocessor that feeds the
Drivers and MOSFETS and sets the timing and sequence. Other than that - no clue as to what you're referring to.

Flywheels, control schemes, mass, direction of rotation, matter - cruel jokes - understanding processes - WTF?

There are quite a few of them so here's a link to a list: (can not post animated gifs on this forum)

https://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=4261.msg99442#msg99442

And, yea I do understand what I'm dealing with, both with respect to the LinGen, HES and some of the posters here.

It's been analyzed and simulated many times and it works. Mass, inertial and matter are not relavent. basically, I have
no idea what your talking about or trying to convey. Sorry!

SL

Actually I re-read your post, and IMHO your drunk - - -  so now I jealous!   :P

rakarskiy

 :) ;)
If the time has not come to realize everything, do not rush.
I won't insist.
Why is the transformer not "OU"? there is also flux linkage and an increase in the magnetic flux in the core.
By the way, the simulator does not correctly calculate the flux linkage in the transformer when the primary and secondary are wound over the first. The simulator will show you that the field is not in the kernel, but it is.
Any program is an episode of mathematical calculation based on the understanding of the operator's processes. 

rakarskiy

Quote from: kolbacict on January 12, 2023, 03:21:36 AM
The fact that the field is stronger in iron is clear. But we need not in iron, but in another, secondary winding. Probably when the field enters the iron, it intensifies, and when it exits towards the other winding, it weakens again. Is this the problem?

The problem is in the exact knowledge of the processes, what is presented in education is very superficial. Basically, these are instructions on how to calculate the device, according to already proven methods. But - what and how is happening there, far away - is not disclosed. I concluded that accurate knowledge of the processes is part of the so-called "closing technologies"