The Secrets Of Back EMF

[joellagace]

I would like to share my findings, this information is very worthwhile but my video explaining what I learned over the winter runs for 30 minutes. It answers many questions and opens the door to new possibilities .I explain how this system can be self sustained, some details on the background of my existing inventions and experiments. Since people are interested, this is a big message and could change the way we all live our regular lives and help the planet

https://youtu.be/6TvkTgjHn2M

Overall, the key aspect of the method, is the use of the back EMF feedback loop to amplify and accumulate energy over time, resulting in a significant increase in power output compared to a simple inductor.

[bistander]

Sorry, but I can't understand or follow that video. You start right off drawing something. Is it supposed to depict what's shown in my attachment? Second attachment is the page from where it was found, which is a university lesson. I think science/engineering has a thorough understanding of this without secrets.
bi

[joellagace]

back EMF voltage can be lower than the pulse voltage, the key aspect to consider here is the feedback loop in the system. The back EMF spike is not simply a passive result of the collapsing magnetic field of the coil, but rather it is utilized as a trigger for the next pulse of energy to be released from the power source. The feedback loop of two coils allows for the amplification and accumulation of the back EMF spikes over time, which can result in a significant increase in power output.

Overall, the key aspect of my topic is the use of the back EMF feedback loop to amplify and accumulate energy over time, resulting in a significant increase in power output compared to a simple inductor.

[bistander]

I think you make up a definition of "back emf" and talk a bunch of gibberish without a clue. Good luck. I'm outta here.
bi

[joellagace]

I think you make up a definition of "back emf" and talk a bunch of gibberish without a clue. Good luck. I'm outta here.
bi

Thank you for taking the time to read about my methods. I appreciate your feedback, but I would appreciate it even more if you could provide more specific details and evidence to support your claim that my definition of 'back emf' is incorrect and that my explanations are gibberish. I am open to constructive criticism and would like to have a productive discussion to improve my understanding and work