ZERG generator nullifies EMF with field, "doubles input efficiency"

[lancaIV]

Razer,chapter11 and bancruptcy !
Yes,but the technology is as employer,owner,company independent to see ! Free source !What is,in application,rotative, the ' duty cycle' use effect ?
RPM
R= 360°divided poles,rotor,stator magnetic ancors
rotor : em ? pm? epm ?        epm = coil wrapped permanent magnet
stator : em ? pm ? epm?

https://translationportal.epo.org/emtp/translate/?ACTION=description-retrieval&COUNTRY=DE&ENGINE=google&FORMAT=docdb&KIND=A1&LOCALE=en_EP&NUMBER=3826970&OPS=ops.epo.org/3.2&SRCLANG=de&TRGLANG=en

The power requirement, whether for one attraction impulse or for many, remains constant, even if the number of attraction impulses is up to several thousand per minute, because the attraction impulses occur in sequence, in fractions of a second.
So there are never several attraction impulses at the same time.

So the power generator only ever has to supply the power for one electromagnet.
Thid claim was tested,with capacitive magnets
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/searchResults?submitted=true&locale=en_EP&DB=EPODOC&ST=advanced&TI=&AB=&PN=&AP=&PR=&PD=&PA=Envez&IN=&CPC=&IC=&Submit=Search

Beside Becker,also Tesla and Plauson research included and tested !
40. and 41.
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/searchResults?submitted=true&locale=en_EP&DB=EPODOC&ST=advanced&TI=&AB=&PN=&AP=&PR=&PD=&PA=Otto+traun+&IN=&CPC=&IC=

[SolarLab]

Detailed Proof Road Map

Bi, please help us out here,

Being a self-professed expert on "Proofs," please compile a detailed description of
what exactly you consider a "Proof" or POC. 

Use Specific Requirements, in bullet form, with details. Then give technical examples,
in a detailed Flow Chart Diagram with respect to accomplishing these so called
Proofs.

Also include a Gantt Chart of the process flow; and finally, your estimates of the
costs to complete this entire Proof scenario.

Thanks in advance - it will help everyone when attempting to provide a Proof
that You consider acceptable and save everyone a lot of time and effort, thus
removing the guess work and any ambiguity. Right now it's like hugging jello!

We all look forward to receiving and reviewing your work-product.

This will definitely help us in securing your investment offers, and such... A more
than fair request considering the potential for a very "High Reward" ROI.   

Regards,

SL

[bistander]

Detailed Proof Road Map

Bi, please help us out here,

Being a self-professed expert on "Proofs," please compile a detailed description of
what exactly you consider a "Proof" or POC. 

Use Specific Requirements, in bullet form, with details. Then give technical examples,
in a detailed Flow Chart Diagram with respect to accomplishing these so called
Proofs.

Also include a Gantt Chart of the process flow; and finally, your estimates of the
costs to complete this entire Proof scenario.

Thanks in advance - it will help everyone when attempting to provide a Proof
that You consider acceptable and save everyone a lot of time and effort, thus
removing the guess work and any ambiguity. Right now it's like hugging jello!

We all look forward to receiving and reviewing your work-product.

This will definitely help us in securing your investment offers, and such... A more
than fair request considering the potential for a very "High Reward" ROI.   

Regards,

SL

Hi SL,

I think Willy outlined it well when he wrote:

Second, it is up to you (the presenter) to prove or show experimentally
any O.U. results you might claim.

Third, It is not up to others (i.e. bistander) to disprove O.U. claims.  It is reasonable
that the burden of proof rest upon any claimant of what is extra ordinary, to demonstrate
and CLEARLY AND PLAINLY describe their method or device,

and

to show measurements along with the methods of how those measurements were taken.

best wishes
          floor

So let's start with that. BTW, what did you use when you determined that you had done this:

...
I'm probably the only one here who has shown and
proven (using CAE and in the lab) an "excess Energy" device -
...
SL

Why not show your documentation and data from that proof?

A sincere effort to show real time simultaneous input and output power for a sustained period of at least a few minutes. That may not be sufficient to entice me to invest funds, but would convince me to take you, and Holcomb, seriously.

Thank you and regards,
bi

[SolarLab]

Bi,

Thanks - I was looking for a bit more technical detail - lots of general words, etc.
but absolutely no detail - but thanks anyway.

Some thing like - here's our criteria, in detail, that proves the concept - much like
you would see during a design review for a Space Vehicle, a Bridge, or a High Rise - since
it's hard to "prove" until it's actually build and launched - and by then it's too late!

You don't think you just sketch things out and launch them do you? How do you think
the Professionals ensure the design is a good one for large complex projects, or even
small technical projects, before securing funds or building?

Well, you're right - just like Boeing, Spar Aerospace, P&H, and yes LinGen - CAE Analysis.

Oh well - I asked - and you answered - so thanks! With respect to publishing any details;
my requirements have been outlined in some of the posts above - not until it's perfected, 
safe from litigation, meets regulatory requirements, and so forth. (a.k.a. - CYA)

We're obviously just from two very different Worlds, and that's OK!    I can appreciate that.

You probably do as well - especially if you fly or drive a modern car or cross a bridge or
take the elevator in a high rise... Even small kitchen appliances employ CAE validations
before any prototyping - confirms the POC before ever picking up a soldering iron. 

Good luck in your investing...

SL

[bistander]

Bi,

Thanks - I was looking for a bit more technical detail - lots of general words, etc.
but absolutely no detail - but thanks anyway.

Some thing like - here's our criteria, in detail, that proves the concept - much like
you would see during a design review for a space vehicle, a bridge, or a High Rise - since
it's hard to prove until it's actually build and launched - and by then it's too late!

You don't think you just sketch things out and launch them do you? How do you think
the professionals ensure the design is a good one for large complex projects, or even
small technical projects, before securing funds?

Well, you're right - just like Boeing, Spar Aerospace, P&H, and yes LinGen - CAE Analysis.

Oh well - I asked - and you answered - so thanks! With respect to publishing an details;
my requirements have been detailed in some of the posts above - not until it's perfected, 
and safe from litigation, and so forth.

We're just from two very different Worlds, and that's OK!     I can appreciate that.

You probably do as well - especially if you fly or drive a modern car or cross a bridge or
take the elevator in a high rise...

Good luck in your investing...

SL

SL,
What's wrong with this?

Hi SL,
...
... what did you use when you determined that you had done this:

...
I'm probably the only one here who has shown and
proven (using CAE and in the lab) an "excess Energy" device -
...
SL

Why not show your documentation and data from that proof?

A sincere effort to show real time simultaneous input and output power for a sustained period of at least a few minutes.
...

Can't you pull up your lab log, copy and paste the data here with the photos. Or simply repeat the same test. That's all I'm asking. Proof of your claim. Nothing exotic. Just accurate input and output power, like you would have needed to conclude that you had proven it in the lab.

You made the claim based on a test right? Show it to us, or repeat it and show that to us. What is wrong with that?

bi