Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Barbat low inertial mass generator

Started by tak22, April 21, 2007, 06:17:33 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

tak22

sam,

from my understanding it wouldn't work that way as it requires the physical geometry between the smaller input coil and the larger energy magnifying coil to minimize the BMF regions, which then maximizes the output potential.

tak


supersam

tak,

i am sure you are alot more familiar with the design than i am.  however the first impression i got, from my initial read was, " this is a patent for a tpu" !

would you cosider an experiment where the input coil was placed on the inside of the manifying coil?  if the magnifying coil was enlarged, and the input coil was properly spaced inside, it seems that it would not only magnify, in a small arc, but would be magnifying 360.  just extend both coils into a toroid and viola, a TPU!!!  maybe, possibly, hopefully.  what do you think?

lol
sam

tak22

sam,

I'm so glad to see your enthusiasm and questions!

I'd certainly like to be the expert on this tech, but so far I've only gotten so far as to understand how this might work based on the patent. Maybe/if it's proven then it can be extended to other configurations. At the same time, there's nothing stopping anyone from trying any config they can dream up within the basic "rules" set by Barbat.

and these are: the input coil radiates inductive photons to the energy coil (which has low mass surface electrons), "magic" happens  ;), and the energy coil radiates to the output coil, voila! A -> B -> C. It's up to the experimenter to find the best configuration that optimizes the two exchanges, and minimizes the BMF.

if a TPU configuration works, then great!  I'm here to encourage replication and experimentation and learn enough to know what I need to do this myself.

tak




Localjoe

Just a side note... I do remember some talk about placement of primary coils... look at a tesla coil, the generic shows us a few rings of a large copper gauge wound around in mid air at the base of the secondary... Or at least thats what's in just about every video and most diagrams folks post ... now to my point... Tesla's patents speak of a flat wound spiral primary seated at the base of the secondary. So look at it this way take the lid of a coffee can and say thats your primary and take an empty paper towel cardboard tube and place it upright in the center of the plastic coffee can top.   now... drop a marble down the tube and realize that if suspended there might be some spring action .... like a pump or swing.. smack... The difference im starting to see is that part of geometry of the primary is within the tube not inside it technically but within the z axis at the base.. top down you see the coffee can top when you look through the tube..   Now what i was getting at is all these other primaries are outside the tube looking down just circling it..  Just some conclusions ive drawn.
GET THIS ONE - Bush wants to stop Iran from enriching uranium .. now as oberman said and others any drunk coke head can find out how to do this not just bush.

Also in reality Google has provided this info for some time.. so heres my point.

It's OK for GOOGLE TO PROVIDE INSTRUCTIONS FOR URANIUM ENRICHMENT but not OK FOR FOLKS TO SHARE TORRENTS OF MUSIC THEY POTENTIALLY OWN> AS WELL THEIR GOODS SHOULD BE SEIZED AND CHECKED AT AIRPORTS For copyright infringement.. ?????

This is the world we live in. More concerned if some exec doesn't get his buck than if some terrorist blows us to hell..

tak22

think about all the old energy patents and pictures you've seen with "coils of copper" in them,

and remember that it's only fairly recent that copper wire has been annealed with a process that keeps oxyen away and prevents cupric oxide CuO from forming.

so now look at the pictures again with an eye to what might be happening with some of these oxidized coils ....

tak